Gemini Bay Transcription Pvt Ltd Vs. Integrated Sales Service Limited And Anr.

Decided On : Aug-10-2021

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the “Arbitration Act, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement.44, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, the Representation Agreement, Order # 4, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, the Representation Agreement, Section 44, Section 3, Section 50, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, Section 47(1)(c, Section 48, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 46 and Section 35, the Arbitration Act, Section 46, Section 48, Section 48(1)(c, Chapter, section 44, Section 44, the Arbitration Act, Section 2, Section 47, Section 47, Article IV of the New York Convention, the Arbitration Act, Article IV1, Article IV of the New York Convention, Article IV, Article IV, Article IV, Article IV, Article IV, Section 44, Section 47(1)(c, Section 44(b, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48(1, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34(2)(a, Section 34, Section 34(2)(a, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48.40, Sections 48(1, Section 7 of the Foreign Awards Act, the Geneva Convention of 1927, Article I, Article I, the Geneva Convention, Article V and the court, Article V, Article V, Article V(1, the Foreign Awards Act, Section 7 of the Act, Section 7(1)(b)(ii, Article I(e, the Geneva Convention Act, Section 7(1, Section 7(1)(b)(ii, the Foreign Awards Act, Article V(2)(b, the Foreign Awards Act, Article I(c, the Geneva Convention of 1927, Section 7(1, Protocol, Section 7(1)(b)(ii, the Foreign Awards Act, Section 7(1)(b)(ii, the Foreign Awards Act, Section 37, the Arbitration Act, Section 48 of the Act, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, Section 48, the Arbitration Act, Section 44, Section 44, Section 48(1)(a).44, Section 103(2)(b, the UK Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 103(2)(b, Article V(1)(a, the UK Act and Section 48(4)(a, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 44, the Arbitration Act 1996, Section 48(1)(a, Section 48(2, the Indian Arbitration Act, the Australian Act i.e., Section 8(1, the Australian Act, Section 46, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 8(5)(b, Section 8(1, Section 8(5)(b, Section 48(1)(a, the Arbitration Act, the Indian Arbitration Act, Section 48(1)(a, Section 48(1, the Arbitration Act, Section 48 of the Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 48, Section 48(1)(c, Section 48(1)(c, Section 28(1)(a, Section 43(3, Section 28(3, Section 34(2)(a)(iv, the Singapore Act, Section 48(1)(c, the Arbitration Act, Section 48

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, R.F. Nariman, Integrated Sales Services Ltd., DMC Management Consultants Ltd., Nagpur, ISS, DMC, Goods and Services, Company, the American Arbitration, Association, DMC, ISS, DMC, ISS, DMC, the State of Delaware, ISS, DMC, Mauritius, Gemini Bay Consulting Limited, Gemini Bay Transcription Private Limited, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management Consultants, Gemini Bay Consulting Limited, DMC Management Consultants, ISS, Gemini Bay Transcription Private Limited, GBT, DMC Management Consultants, ISS, GBT, Claimant ISS, MedQuist Transcriptions Ltd, AssistMed, Inc., ISS and Respondents, ISS, DMC Management Consultants, ISS, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management Consultants, MedQuist, Customer, MedQuist, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management Consultants, DMC Management, Respondents, the Customers with Respondent Gemini Bay Consultants, Respondent Gemini Bay Transcriptions, GBT, DMC Management employees Consultants, Respondents, DMC Management Consultants, Respondents, DMC Management Consultants, commissions.43, DMC Management Consultants, ISS, DMC Management Consultants, Respondents, Respondents, Claimant ISS, Respondents, GBT, GBT, Defendant No.3, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Arbitration Agreement, Defendant No.3, Plaintiff, Rupees Ten Lacs, Hon'ble Court, Arbitrator, and4, ISS, DMC, DMC, Respondents, ISS, DMC Management Consultants Limited, Boston University Law Faculty, Non Signatories and International, MacMahon, ed, Oxford University Press, the Delaware Court of Chancery, DMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, the Board of DMC, DMC, ÐMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, DMC, ISS, Goods and Services, DMC, DMC, ISS, ISS, DMC, DMC, the Board of DMC, DMC, DMC/Gemini Bay, ISS, DMC, ISS, DMC, Respondents, DMC, the Payment Clause, DMC, DMC, DMC, ISS, AssistMed, DMC, DMC, DMC, Respondents, DMC, Claimant, DMC, ISS, Claimant, Claimant, Respondents, Claimant, Respondents, AssistMed, Claimant, AssistMed, Assisted, DMC Management Consultants, Ltd, DMC Global, Inc., Gemini Bay Consulting Limited, Gemini Bay Transcription Private Limited, Respondents, Integrated Sales Services Ltd, Claimant, the International Centre for Dispute Resolution, ICDR, Respondents, Claimant and Respondents, Respondents, Arbitration, the High Court of Judicature, the Representation Agreements, the International Arbitration Tribunal, Court, Sections 48(1)(c, DMC, DMC, Division Bench, Abolition of Letters Patent, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, DMC’s Special Leave Petition (SLP, DMC, DMC, DMC, GBT, DMC, GBT, the Delhi High Court, Agritrade International, National Agricultural Coop, Federation of India Ltd., Award, Dallah Real Estate and, Tourism Co v Ministry of Religious Affairs, ISS, Arbitrator, DMC, GBT, ISS, DMC, Convention, the Central Government, Convention, the New York Convention, the Central Government, the New York Convention, R.M. Investment and Trading Co., Boeing Co., Recognition & Enforcement, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd., General Electric Co., Koch Navigation Inc., Hindustan Petroleum Corpn., International Commercial Arbitration, Convention’s, Central Government, Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd., High Court, Delhi High Court, WEB Techniques & Net Solutions, Gati Ltd., Haryana High Court, SIDC Ltd., AMCI, P) Ltd., Court, Emkay Global Financial Services Ltd., the New York Convention, & Construction Co. Ltd., NHAI, the New York Convention, Court, Court, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd., General Electric Co., See Dicey & Morris, The New York Convention, the New York Convention, Article V. None, The New York Arbitration Convention of 1958, The New York Convention, Redfern & Hunter, International Commercial Arbitration, the Protocol & Convention Act, the New York Convention of 1958, the New York Convention and Section 7(1)(b)(ii, Karia, Court, Recognition, Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards, Convention, Sui Southern Gas Co. Ltd., Habibullah Coastal Power Co., Sui Southern Gas Co. Ltd., Habibullah Coastal Power Co., Pte) Ltd., SSGC, SSGC, the New York Convention, the New York Convention, the Division Bench, Dallah, Dallah, the Awami Hajj Trust, The Supreme Court, the Government of Pakistan, Tribunal, The Tribunal’s award, Dallah, Court, Government, Dallah, Government, Government, Tribunal, Trust, the Government of Pakistan, the Government of Pakistan, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, the New York Convention, Dardana Ltd, Yukos Oil Co, the Court of Appeal, Sarhank Group v Oracle Corp, China Minmetals Materials Import and Export Co Ltd, International Commercial Arbitration, Dallah, the Supreme Court of, IMC Aviation Solutions Pty Ltd., the Supreme Court of, Dallah, the Australian International Arbitration Act, The Supreme Court of, Court, Court, Court, Court, Dallah, Collins JSC, Dardana Ltd, Yukos Oil Co., Mance LJ, Dallah, AVA, aloe vera, AVA, AVA, AVA, AVA’s, Asianic Food (S) Pte Ltd., AVA and Asianic, Asianic, AVA, AVA, Singapore’s International Arbitration Act, Agreement, District Court, Sarhank Group v Oracle Corporation, Yearbook Comm Arbʼn XXVIII, Court, the Court of Appeals, Convention, The Court of Appeals, Court, DMC, DMC, Sections 34(2)(a)(iii, Olympus Superstructures, Section 48(1)(c, Court, Section 48(1)(c, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral, the Indian Arbitration Act, AVA and Asianic, AVA, LexisNexis, Peter Cremer GmbH & Co v Co-operative, Molasses Traders Ltd, the Irish Supreme Court, Javor v Francoeur, Mr Dhillonʼs, the Arbitrator’s Award

CARDINAL: J1, II, 2, 3, 2, 4, one, one, one, one, 3, 4, 4, 13, two, 5, approximately 4, at least four, 30, two, 6, 90, 7, two, 8, 9, 1, 2, 2010.10, four, 1, 2, 10, two, two, 1, 8), 12, 16, 7, 16, 18, through25, 19, 18, 15, 169, 16, 5, 3, six million, nine hundred and forty-eight, sixty-three thousand, 18, 16, 3/10/2000, No.3(i, 19, 20, 1996.22, 21, 2017.23, 44, 47, 1, two, two, two, 24, 25, 44, one, between 26, 1, 48, 1, 27, 29, six, one, 2, 31, 546, 4, 723, 4, 262, 8), 1, 2, 3, one, 863, 866, 1, 32, six, 1 to 4, 1, 2, 9, 34, two, 3, 863, 95, 17, 34(6, 35, 22, 48(2, 15, 1, 671- 72, 681, 34, 34, 36, 578, 1, two, 2, 1, 2, 37, 461, 65, 38, 39, 11, only one, 40, 48, 50, 43, 146, 146, 1996.46, 2, 44, 11, 404, 334, 2778–2779.49, 46, 2011, 47, 8(1, 8, 48, 8(1, 8(2, 159, 8(5)(b, 160, 165, 49, 8(5)(b, 166, 8(5)(b, 171, 8(5)(b, 172, 1(a, 8(5)(b, 50, 8(5)(b, one, 272, 166, 171, 172, 8(5)(b, One, 31(2, one, 13.7, one, 53, 404, 31, 32, 3, 59, 5, 19, 56, 67, 12, 587-88, 10-11, 10, 58, 59, only one, 1, 60, 20.145, 573, 61, 62

DATE: 18th September, 2000, six months, 18th September, 2000, October, 2000, 1st January, 2008, October, 2000, 22nd June, 2009, 22nd June, 2009, September 18, 2000, approximately June 30, 2008, 38, July 22, 2008, 90 days later, 15 days from now, today, two July 22, 2008, October 22, 2008, October 22, 2008, 48 months, October 22, 2008, 25th January, 23rd December, 2009, 28th March,, 2010, September 18 2000, 11 13, 2009, 3 year, 90 days', 120 days', 2012, 2012, 1717, thirty (30) days, thirty days, July 22, 2008, Friday, March 5, 2010, 18th April, 2016, 28/3/2010, 1986, 23rd June, 2016, 30th September, 2016, 4th January, 2017, 24th February, 11th January, 2017, three months, 21th August, 2017, 1996, 22, 2325, 2012, 2010, the 11th day of October, 1960, 46, 1996, the 11th day of October, 1960, 2830, 2021, 1994, 1961, 1984, 1989, 1996, 2014, 15 April 1999, 2001, 3396-3397, 37, 3338, 2018, 1996, 2018, 2004, Del 106, 2004, 2004, 2012, 2012, one year, 2009, 2017, Del 12758, 2019, 1994, 36, 37, 1961, 1927, 1837, 1937, 41, 2020, 1958, 44, 2010, 1996, 4142, 1996, 26 June 2001, para 31, 1996, 45, 2002, 2005, 2003, 2009, 70, 76, 1974, 1996, 1996, 8(5)(a, 54, 1996, 2006, 1996, 52, 2003, 1043, Cir, 2005, 5458, 2015, 1996, 2015, para 29, 55, 2015, 1999, 1996, 2012, 1996, 2003, 1994, 2003, 1985, 1980, 1996

GPE: Hong Kong, India, Missouri, U.S.A., Kansas City, Missouri, U.S.A., U.S.A., India, British Virgin Islands, British Virgin Islands, India, New Jersey, Los Angeles, California, Kansas City, India, the United States, Kansas City, Missouri, Kansas City, Missouri, Delaware, the United States, India, Delaware, Delaware, Delaware, call.6, Bombay, USA, Delaware, Delaware, Nagpur, India, India, India, New York Convention, Vidya Drolia, India, India, New York Convention, India, Sections 34(5, Sections, Ssangyong Engg, India, India, India, India, Ssangyong, India, India, US, the United Kingdom’s Arbitration Act, the United Kingdom, England, Ssangyong, Victoria, Australia, Victoria, Victoria, the United Kingdom, UK, Texas, USA, Singapore, Singapore, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Arizona, Singapore, US, Egypt, Batts, Hebei, Delaware, MD, India, Ssangyong, India, Ssangyong, India, Singapore, Singapore, Reissue, Arizona, Ssangyong

WORK_OF_ART: DMC, The Agreement, 8(d)(1, MedQuist, Customer, Contract Termination Notice, Accounting for Lost Commissions, un faisceau d'indices, See Clause, The Conflict of Laws, Australian Act, Praveen Enterprises, The Jurisdictional Problems of Arbitration

NORP: Representative, Representative, Representative, and3, Belinda, Medquist, Medquist, Representative, Peteetes, Medquist, Medquist, Medquist, Medquist, Medquist, Medquist, Punjab, English, Indian, Saudi, French, French, French, English, French, Swedish, Egyptian, Chinese, Swedish, Irish

ORDINAL: Secondly, 3rd, first, first, second, 3rd, first, first, First, Second, Third, Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, second, first, facts.48, Thirdly, Sixthly, Fourthly, First, first, second, 2nd, first

PRODUCT: Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, GBT, GBT, GBT, 1 & 2, C-Bay', GBT, Award, the Model Law, Agreement

LOC: Representative, Mt. Laurel, Representative, the Principal District, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge’s, Single Judge’s, Single, Additional District, Single

PERSON: Terry Peteete, Shri Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Terry Peteete, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, xxx xxx xxx, Terry Peteete, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Terry Peteete, xxx xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, Mauritius, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Nagpur, Nos, Nos, and2, Alain Frecon, Award, William W. Park, Upadhyaya, Pathak, Gemini Bay, Gemini Bay, Upadhyaya, Upadhyaya, Upadhyaya, Pathak, Upadhyaya, Upadhyaya, Gemini Bay, Pathak, Upadhyaya, Pathak, Gemini Bay, and2, Upadhyaya, Pathak, Parker, Pathak, Parker, Upadhyaya, Pathak, Gemini Bay, Gemini Bay, Upadhyaya, Gemini Bay, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Gemini Bay, Gupta, Upadhyaya, Peteete, Award, Upadhyaya, Raman Kumar, Award, Award, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Award, Award, Award, Nagpur, Nagpur Bench, Terry L. Peteete, Ram Pathak, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Award, K.V. Vishwanathan, Award, ipse dixit, Award, Award, Award, Award, Shri Vishwanathan, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Award, Award, Shri Arif Bookwala, Shri Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Award, Parker, Shri Pathak, Shri Arun Upadhyaya, Shri Vishwanathan, Shri Salve, Shri Vishwanathan, Shri Salve, Award, Gazette, Model Law, Schedule, Gary B. Born, Gary Born, xxx xxx xxx, Y.B. Comm, Cour de justice, Shri Vishwanathan, Girdhar Sondhi, Bill, Ashok Hans, Sial Bioenergie v. SBEC Systems, Sunil K. Kansal, Girdhar Sondhi v., Renusagar, Supp, 11th Edn., Vol, Albert Jan van den Berg, Alan Redfern, Martin Hunter, Law, 2nd Edn., V(2)(b, Vijay Karia v., xxx xxx, Dallah, Dr Shah, Mustill, alter ego, Dallah, Collins, V(1)(a, Yukos, Chi Mei Corpn, Shri Vishwanathan, xxx xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, xxx xxx xxx, Aloe Vera of America, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Chiew, Sarhank, Sarhank, Parker, Pathak, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Vishwanathan, Meena Vijay Khetan, Ssangyong, Award, Loh, Award, Chiew, Loh, Prof Wedam-Lukic, Art V(1)(c, Halsburyʼs Laws of Singapore, Finlay CJ, Peter Cremer, Chiew, Award, Chiew, Shri Vishwanathan, Vijay Karia

PERCENT: 20%

MONEY: approximately $100,000, 100,000, $4.8 million, 2, 3, 3, 4, one hundred dollars, 6,948,100.00).2, fourteen thousand dollars, 14,000.00, forty-nine thousand, nine hundred and three dollars, 49,903.00, 63,903.00, 2.5 million US Dollars, 29 “Act

FAC: Gemini Bay, Gemini Bay, Gemini Bay, Gemini Bay, the Gemini Bay/Medquist/AssistMed Agreements, Delaware law.3, the Representation Agreements, the Aloe Vera of America

EVENT: the Bombay HC, Article II, New York Convention, the Singapore Act, the “Singapore Act

QUANTITY: 57 xxx xxx