Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Vinod Prasad Raturi Vs. Union Of India

Decided On : Mar-05-2021

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 73 of the Act, Article 136 of the Constitution of India, the SCS Officers

ORG: Non-Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Civil Appeal, SLP, Vinod Prasad Raturi & Ors, Versus Union of India & Ors, Departmental Promotion Committee, The State of Uttar Pradesh, the Uttar Pradesh Reorganization Act, The State of Uttarakhand, The Central Government, the State of Uttar Pradesh, ge, A State Advisory Committee, the Central Government, The State Advisory Committee, State Civil Service, SCS, the State of Uttarakhand, the State of Uttarakhand, the High Court of Judicature, Allahabad, the State of Uttarakhand, the Writ Petition, the Central Government, the High Court, the Writ Petition, the State of Uttarakhand, the High Court, SCS Officers, Special Leave Petitions, Court, ge, Court, The State of Uttarakhand, the Government of India, the Indian Administrative Services, IAS, SLP, the Government of India, the State of Uttarakhand, IAS, the IAS (Appointment by Promotion) Regulations, the High Court, Review Petition, Court, the Government of India, the State of Uttarakhand, the Government of Uttar Pradesh, the Central Government, The Government of India, the State of Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttarakhand, State Civil Services Officers, Short Service Commission, the Indian Army, SCS Officers, IAS, PCS, IAS, IAS, Respondents, the All India Services, SCS, the High Court, the Writ Petition, Respondents, Appellants, Additional Solicitor General, the Union of India, the Appellants, Respondent No.4, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, IAS, State, IAS, the State of Uttarakhand, IAS, IAS, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court, Court, the State of Uttarakhand, the Union of India, the Union of India, SCS Officers, Court, the High Court, the Writ Petition, the Central Government, State, Court, IAS, State of Uttarakhand, the State of Uttarakhand, SCS, SCS, IAS, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Court, IAS, SCS, IAS, the State of Uttarakhand, Court, the Appellants to IAS, SLP, the State of Uttar Pradesh, the Union of India, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, the State of Uttarakhand, the State of Uttar Pradesh, IAS, the State of Uttar Pradesh, Appellants, Uttar Pradesh, ge, the High Court, ge

DATE: 2021, 2019, the 4th Respondent, 2000, 11.12.2003, 07.01.2004, the year 2010, the year 2009, 2011, 2003, 2011, 17.03.2017, the year, 2010, the year, 2005, 20.06.2018, the year 2016, the year 2016, earlier years, March 05, 2021

PERSON: Appellant(s, JUDGMENT L. NAGESWARA RAO, quo.4, V. Shekhar, Rupinder Singh Suri, V.K. Shukla, Appellants, Appellants, J.[ S. RAVINDRA BHAT ]

NORP: J.1

CARDINAL: 30.09.2000, two, 1, 22.04.2003, 2, 9, 2, 11, 15.04.2011.5, 5(1, 1955.6, 12.02.2015, 3, 25.06.2015, No.4, 28.09.2016, 20.02.2017, No.4, 23.11.2017, No.4, 09.01.2018, 4, six, 5, No.4, 09.11.2000, 6, No.4, 7, 09.11.2000, 8, 9

GPE: States, the State of Uttar Pradesh, disturbed.10, New Delhi

PRODUCT: Appellant No.2, Appellant No.2, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4, Respondent No.4

LOC: the Appellant No.2

FAC: the Writ Petition

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //