Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hindustan Unilever Limited Vs. The State Of Madhya Pradesh

Decided On : Nov-05-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 401(1, Section 2(1G)(K, Section 2(ia)(m, Food Adulteration Act, Section 14, the 2006 Act, Section 97 of the 2006 Act, Article 20 of the Constitution of India, the “Act, section 97, the “Act, Section 16, Section 2(ia)(m, Section 7(i, the 2006 Act, Section 401, Section 401, the 2006 Act, Section 16A, Section 97 of the 2006 Act, Section 97 of the 2006 Act, Section 6, Section 6, Central Act or Regulation, the Repealing Act or Regulation, Section 6, the Repealing Act or Regulation, Section 97, Section 6, the Interpretation Act of England, the Interpretation Act, the Repealing Act, the Interpretation Act, the Repealing Act, the Interpretation Act, Section 4, Section 7, Section 11, Section 7, Section 11, Section 8, Section 6, Section 11, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 277 of 1961 Act, the Income Tax Act, Section 297 of the, Section 52, Section 52 of the 1922 Act, Section 297(2, Section 277, Section 6, Section 52, Section 6, Section 97 of the 2006 Act, Section 6, Section 97 of the 2006 Act, Section 401(2, Section 138, the Negotiable Instruments Act, the ‘NI Act, Section 141, Section 141, Section 141, Section 17 of the Act, Section 17, Section 17 of the Act, Section 141, the NI Act and Section 17 of the Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRIMINAL, UNILEVER, CRIMINAL, JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, the High Court of, the Hindustan Unilever Limited1, Hindustan Lever Limited, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Hindustan Lever Limited, Court, Hindustan Lever Limited, Hindustan Lever Limited, Court, Food and Health, Dalda Vanaspati Khajoor, Company, The Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, Lipton India Limited, Lipton India Limited, Court, R. Banerjee & Ors, H.D. Dubey & Ors.3, Magistrate, the High Court, Magistrate, the Local (Health) Authority, Local (Health), Local (Health) Authority, Directors, Court, Company, Nirmal, Company, Lipton India Limited, the Food Safety and Standards Act, Hindustan Limited Company, Godown Rathore Clearing, Forwarding Agency, Hindustan Liver Limited, Food Adulteration and Prevention Act, Company, Additional Sessions, Rathore Clearing and Forwarding Agency, Court, the Hindustan Lever Limited, Court, Additional Sessions, the First Appellate Court, Court, Court, the Food Safety and Standard Act, Trial Court, Subordinate Court, Additional Sessions, The High Court, Company, the High Court, Company, Court, Court, Court, State of Himachal Pradesh7.12, Company, the High Court, Company, Court, Parliament, the Central Government, State, State, Court, Mohar, Court, Parliament, Vide Craies on Statute Law, The High Court, Sections 7, Sections 47, Legislature, Tiwari Kanhaiyalal & Ors, Income Tax, Court, Court, the High Court, Company, the High Court, Court, Directors, Information Technology 11, Sub-Section, Sub-Section, the Nominated Person, Clauses, the Nominated Person, Company, the High Court, the High Court, the Nominated Person, the High Court, NAGESWARA RAO

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, J.1, Shri Nirmal Sen, Nirmal Sen, Vanaspati Ghee, H. Dayani, Nirmal Sen, Directors, Mohd, Dayani, Nirmal Sen, Nirmal Sen, Panagar, Mohd, Salim, H.D. Dubey, xx xx xx 60, Nirmal Sen, Nirmal Sen, Nirmal Sen, grounds.8, Stays, Nirmal Sen, Dayani, Mohd, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Henry Ah Hoe & Anr.6, Siddharth Luthra, Singhvi, Emphasis Supplied, Vide Crawford on Statutory Construction, Luthra, Bench, Aneeta Hada v., xx xx xx 56, Directors, xx xx xx, J.(L., GUPTA

GPE: Jabalpur, Cr, P.C., Jabalpur, Vanaspati, Nemi Chand, Nemi Chand, Harish, Rs.1,000/-, T. Barai, Nemi Chand, Trilok Chand, T. Barai, Nemi Chand, England, England, Trilok Chand, Trilok Chand, NEW DELHI

CARDINAL: 9.1.2020, 8, 1, 2, 12, 2, 2, 6.7.1993, four, 23.8.2006.5, 32(f, 4, 4, 7(i)/16(1)/(a, 2(A, 31, 6.7.1993, 5, 39, 1, 5, 17, 711, two-fold, Rs.5, 3(1)(i, 2, 6, 1, 2, 5.8.2011, 97, 8, 9, 2, 3, 4, 10, 11, 6, 323, 599, 8, 8, 7, 1, 2, 12, 2, 10, 4, three, 5, 38, 16, 17, 2, 17, 2, 22, 1, 1, 18, 19

DATE: 16/06/2015, 19542, 1992, 20064, 58, the day, 1954, 1954, 2006, 24.08.2006, 1954, 2018, 1954, several years, less than six months, up to 3 years, 1983, 2010, 1.10.2019 8 19738, 1897, 10 of 1897, three years, 14, 1897, 1897, 1889, 1889, 1948, 3rd day of March, 1948, 13 16, 1922, 1961, 1961, 1922, 1961, 1922, 1897, 1975, more than 30 years, 188112, 2012, 2000, 58, more than last 30 years, NOVEMBER5 2020

PRODUCT: Shri H.D. Dubey, Act

QUANTITY: 41.8 degree, 31-41

EVENT: the 2006 Act, the 2006 Act, the 2006 Act, the ‘Code’, the 2006 Act, the 2006 Act, the 2006 Act

ORDINAL: 5th, first

MONEY: 9 AIR1955SC8412 Act

WORK_OF_ART: The East Punjab Refugees (Registration of Land Claims) Ordinance 7 of

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //