Tofan Singh Vs. The State Of Tamil Nadu

Decided On : Oct-29-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 67, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 67, Section 161 CrPC, section 67, the NDPS Act, the Customs Act, the Central Excise Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, Section 67, Section 161 of the Code, Section 164, Section 67, Section 108, the Customs Act or Section 14 of the Excise Act, the Customs Act, Section 14 of the Act, Section 67 of the NDPS Act, Section 42 of the NDPS Act, Section 53 of the NDPS Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 67, section 42, Section 67, the NDPS Act, the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, section 42, section 68, section 42, the NDPS Act, section 53, section 173, the NDPS Act, section 67, section 42, section 42, the NDPS Act, section 49, the NDPS Act, section 67, section 42, section 67, the Indian Evidence Act, section 67, the Customs Act 1962, section 14, section 67, section 67, section 42, section 67, section 25, the Evidence Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, section 67, section 53, Article 14 of the Constitution, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, section 161, the NDPS Act, section 67, the NDPS Act, the Customs Act, Central Excise Act, the NDPS Act, section 59(3, section 53, section 169, section 169, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, Article 20(3, Constitution, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, the Customs Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, Constitution, the NDPS Act, section 67, section 42, the NDPS Act, section 67, the NDPS Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, the NDPS Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 36, section 36, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 161, section 42, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 53 of the NDPS Act, section 67, section 2(g, section 67, section 67, section 161, section 67, section 161, section 53, the NDPS Act, section 42, section 53 of the NDPS Act, section 67, section 24, the Evidence Act, Chapter V of the, section 67, section 67, section 36A(1, the NDPS Act, section 173, section 173, section 36A(1)(d, the NDPS Act, the Police Act, section 36A(1)(d, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, section 2(d, the NDPS Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 67, section 67, section 67, Constitution Bench, section 67, the Evidence Act, section 67, section 161 of the CrPC, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, the Evidence Act, Section 139 of the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, the Indian Constitution, the US Constitution, Article 20(3, section 73, the Evidence Act, section 27, the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, section 27, the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Article 14, section 27 21, the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, section 161, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Section 161(1, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Constitution, Constitution, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Section 161, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 161(1, Article 20(3, Article 20(3).58, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, Article 20(3, Constitution, Article 20(3, Article 22(1, the Evidence Act, Section 162, Chapter XII, Section 145, the Evidence Act, Section 315(1, Section 25, the Evidence Act, Section 26, Section 27, Section 26, Section 27, the Evidence Act and Section 164, Section 24, the Evidence Act, Section 30, the Evidence Act, Section 164 of the Code, Section 164, Section 164, Section 164, the TADA Act, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, section 15, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Chapter III, Section 15, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3).181, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 161(2, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Section 27, the Evidence Act, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, Constitution, the US Constitution, the Indian Constitution, Article 21, Article 20(3, the US Constitution, Article 20(3, Constitution, the US Constitution, Constitution, Article 21 or under Article 19, the US Constitution, Article 20(3, the Indian Constitution, Article 21 and Article 19, the Indian Constitution, the Fourth Amendment, the Fifth Amendment, Article 20(3, Article 20(3).457, Constitution, Article 20(3, Article 20(3, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 12, Article 20(3, Universal Declaration of Human Rights, Article 21, Constitution, Article 21, the Indian Constitution, Article 21, Article 21, Article 21, Constitution, Constitution, Article 21, Article 21, Article 20(3, Article 21, the NDPS Act, Constitution, Constitution, Article 359(1, the NDPS Act, the Evidence Act, the Criminal Procedure Code, Act 25 of 1861, the Evidence Act, Section 25, the Evidence Act, section 25, section 24, section 24, section 25, the Evidence Act, section 25, the Evidence Act, Article 20(3, Constitution, Section 24, Section 25, Section 24, Section 25, Section 24, Section 25, Section 25, Section 25, Article 20(3, section 25, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, section 46, the NDPS Act, Sections 22, The Customs Officers, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, Section 41, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, the NDPS Act, section 26, section 33, section 51, section 52 53A, the NDPS Act, the Opium Act, the Opium Act, the Dangerous Drugs Act, The Dangerous Drugs Act, the NDPS Act, Chapter IV

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRL, CRL, R.F. Nariman, Court, Court, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances, Court, Raj Kumar Karwal v. Union of India, State, Raj Kumar Karwal, Bench, Bench, the Andhra Pradesh High Court, the Appellants in Criminal Appeal Nos, Jain, a ‘First Information Report, CrPC, Special Court, Court, K.S. Puttaswamy, Union of India, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, Special Court, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, Court, CrPC, Court, State of Punjab, Maharashtra (1980, the Railway Property, the Sea Customs Act, Court, Jains, State of Punjab, Disruptive Activities, Court, Raj Kumar Karwal, S. Nagamuthu, the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1826 of, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, Magistrate, CrPC, Special Court, the Special Court, the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.344, CrPC, Magistrate, the Directorate of Law Enforcement Handbook, Directorate, CrPC, CrPC, the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.1750, the Special Court, Additional Solicitor General, the Union of India, Court, Basu v. Union of India, CrPC, Court, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, Court, Additional Advocate General, the State of Madhya Pradesh, SLP, CrPC, the State of Gujarat, Court, Ors, Court, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, State, U.P., Court, Court, FIR, Balkishan A. Devidayal, Court, FIR, RPF, Court, CrPC, CrPC, Advocate-General, Advocate- General, Court, himself”.206, the British System of Criminal Jurisprudence, the American System, Court, Magistrate, Sections 24, Magistrates, Certificate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Additional Solicitor General, the Railway Protection Force Act, Railway Property, Court, the High Courts, U.P., Durga Prasad, SCC210, State of W.B., Directorate of Enforcement v. Deepak Mahajan, T.N., TADA, J.in, TADA, Legislature, TADA, State, Legislature, TADA, TADA, Additional Solicitor General, Court, BEAP, CrPC, Kathi Kalu Oghad, BEAP, Kathi Kalu Oghad, Kathi Kalu Oghad, BEAP, the US Supreme Court, Brennan, J.had, the Fifth Amendment.184, BEAP, BEAP, Court, Court, K.S. Puttaswamy, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Nariman, Crown, the King of England, Huckle, the Magna Carta, Entick v. Carrington, Court, the US Fifth Amendment, Court, Court, R.C. Cooper, Court, Court, U.P., Court, the US Fourth Amendment, Regulation 236, J., • Privacy, the State of, • Informational, Parliament, Court, State, Court, proceeding.––A, Court, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Court, Judicial Procedure And Laws Of India & c., Court, the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council, page21, Magistrate, Court, State, CrPC, inter alia, Court, the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, the High Court of Punjab, Court, a Metropolitan Magistrate, Magistrate, the State Government, the Departments of Central Excise……, the Central Government, Revenue…….police, a State Government, CrPC, CrPC, section 32A. Equally, CrPC, the Probation of Offenders Act, CrPC, the High Court’s, Magistrate, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, CrPC, Central, State, Central Acts, Customs, Central Acts, The Government of India, the Convention on Psychotropic Substances, inter alia, Statement, inter alia, Parliament, the International Convention on Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances

PERSON: No.6338 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.77 OF2015CRIMINAL APPEAL No.90, Tofan Singh v. State, Tamil Nadu, Abdul Rashid v. State of Bihar, Noor Aga v. State of Punjab, Kanhaiyalal, Bench, Jain, Shahid Khan, Shri Jain, Shri Jain, Anr, Shri Jain, Shri Jain, Kumar Karwal, Kanhaiyalal, Barkat Ram, Joti Savant v. State of Mysore, Chandra Mehta, Balkishan A. Devidayal v. State of, Baldev Singh, Chandubha Jadeja v. State of, Shri Jain, Kanhaiyalal, Uday Gupta, Gupta, Shri Sanjay Jain, Aman Lekhi, Kumar Karwal, Badku Joti Savant, Shri Jain, Mukesh Singh, Kumar Karwal, Kanhaiyalal, Noor Aga, Saurabh Mishra, Aniruddha Mayee, M.P. Sharma, Bench, Broadly, Bench, Kathi Kalu Oghad, Bench, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, Deoman Upadhyaya, M.P. Sharma, Satpathy, P.L. Dani, SCC424, Miranda, xxx xxx xxx, Kartar Singh, M.P. Sharma, Satish Chandra, Maneck Phiroz Mistry, Kathi Kalu, Satpathy, P.L. Dani, Balkishan A. Devidayal v. State, Chandra Mehta v., Chandra Mehta v. State of W.B., Poolpandi v. Superintendent, MLW, xxx xxx xxx, Kathi Kalu, w].e, Satpathy, P.L. Dani, A.K. Gopalan v. State, Articles 20(3, xxx xxx xxx, M.P. Sharma, J., xxx xxx, M.P. Sharma, Semayne, ER194, William Pitt, King John, Entick v. Carrington 95 ER807, Mansfield, xxx xxx xxx, Maneka Gandhi, Benches of this Court, Maneka Gandhi, xxx xxx xxx, Kharak Singh v. State, SCR332, Wolf, Wolf, Common Law, xxx xxx xxx, Subba Rao, Bench, Bench, Appellants, Narayan Swami, Dinesh Kumar, Noor Aga, Haryana, xxx xxx xxx, Magistrate, Reasons, Bill

GPE: No.1202, Kanhaiyalal v. Union of India, Singh v. State (Narcotic Branch of, Delhi, Kartar, D.K., Bombay, Arizona, District Magistrate, Delhi, Bombay, Bombay, violation.23.Sahai, Gopalan, Selvi, Karnataka, US, L Ed, Chandrachud, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, M.P. Sharma, Magistrates, Camden, England, M.P. Sharma, India, US, UK, India, M.P. Sharma, Gopalan, Kharak, Colorado, Colorado, US25(1949, Fort St. George, India, page110, Deoman Upadhyaya, Pakala, Nagesia, India, India, India, India

DATE: 2013, 2013, 1985, 1990, 2008, 2001, 2008, 1962, 1944, 33, 2001, 2013, 2011, 2014, 2015, 1202, 2017, 1872, 1944, 1962, 1944, 1962, 1964, 1969, 1969, 1966, 1878, 1944, 1962, 2020, 2017, 10 years, up to 20 years, 1999, 1987, 1994, 2013, more than three years, up to three years, three years, three years, 2013, 2009, 1997, section 42, 1861, 1202, 2017, 2009, 2013, 1750, 2009, 1086, 1087-1088, a little later, 2017.An, 1963, 1961, 36-37, 18.It, 70, 23 20.We, 1978, 57, 1954, 1961, 1962, 3 SCR2710, 1978, 1975, 1980, 1969, 1992, 3 SCC259, 1994, 1972, 1962, 21, the days, 2010, 1087, several years later, Schmerber, 1973, 1973, 1954, Articles 19 or 21, A century and a half later, 1215, A few years later, 1948, today, 1964, Articles 19(1)(d, 21, 25, Articles 20(3, 1882, 46, 25, 1861, 1872, 1856, 32, 1966, 2008, 1985, 6-2006, 2000, 80, day, day, 1958, under 18 years of age, fifteen days, 1857, 1878, 1930, a long time ago, 1930, 3 years, 4 years, the last few years, recent years, 1971, one year, ten years

CARDINAL: 16 SCC31, 1, three, 24.1, 2, 4, 9, 16, 2, 41, two, 3, 3.Shri, 152, 836, 433, 77, six, two, 1, 2, four, 4, 42, 10, 5, 161, 6, 160, two, 7, 8, 3, 2, 3, 2, 2, 5.Shri, 9, two, 10, 6, 1, 5, 6, 3, 41 to 43, 12, 36A(1)(d, two, 13, 41, 42, 14, 1, 436, 190, 190, 15, 41, 42, 16, 161, only section 24, 17, 344, 13.Having, 3, eight, 18, 1, 2, 3, 19, 16.The, 2, eight, three, one, 29, 1, 33-34, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 22, 1, 2, 19.It, 2, 21, only two, 24, one, 25, 26, 205, One, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 2, 2, 28, two, 30, one, 2, 6, 1, 1, 29, 1, 1, 3, 2, 4, 3, 2, 4, 5, 3, 6, 261, 9(7, 15, 377, 30, 396, 3, 11, 31, 456, one, One, 32, 21, 179, three, 33, 30, two, 34, 384, 764, two, 35, 189, 36 262, 54, 37, 1872.25.Equally, 26.M.P., 38, 100.M.P., 39, 316, 442, 77, 40, 95, 98, 456, one, 12, 468, 42, 472, 1, 338, 475, nine, eight, six, 521, three, 44, 20(3, 21, 24, 27, 24, 10, 1882).27, 30.The ‘First Report Of Her Majesty’s Commissioners, 47, 48, 1, 26, 3, 27-29, 2, 7-6-2000, 23, 50 75, 85, 27, 161, 162, 172, 4(2, 5, 39.The, 53, three, 40.The, three, 54, 15, ten thousand, one

ORDINAL: 1st, second, first, first, first, third, first, first, third, third, third, third, third, first, second, first, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: Police Officers, CrPC, Shri Aman Lekhi, The Reform Of The Judicial Establishments

PRODUCT: Bench, SCC609to, TADA, Constitutional, Miranda, Chevalier D'eon, 36A(1)(b

FAC: Anand Grover, the Appellant in Criminal Appeal No.90, Raja Ram Jaiswal, the US Fourth Amendment

NORP: Terrorist, Satish, American, American, American, American, M.P. Sharma, Sharma, Costa v., Costa v., Indian, Indian, Narcotics

LANGUAGE: English, English

EVENT: the Fourth Amendment, the Constitution of India, the Fourth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Indian Constitution, the Fourth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the Spanish Inquisition, the US Fourth Amendment, the Fourth Amendment, the 42nd Amendment

PERCENT: 384 US436(1966

MONEY: SCR1077, SCR1077

LOC: Madras, Articles 19(1)(a

TIME: night, the 44th Amendment, night