Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Rhea Chakraborty Vs. The State of Bihar

Decided On : Aug-19-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: section 406 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the Indian Penal Code, Section 6, Article 142 of the Constitution can be, Section 6, the DSPE Act, Section 406, Section 179, Section 181(4, Section 174, Section 174 or, Section 175 CrPC, Page 9, Constitution, Constitution, Page 11, Section 174 CrPC, Section 174 CrPC, Section 406, Section 174 CrPC, Page 15, Section 406 CrPC, Section 406, Section 406, Section 406, Section 406, Section 174 CrPC, Section 154 CrPC, Section 175, Section 154, Section 157 CrPC, Section 174, Section 174 of the Code, Section 174, Section 157 of the Code, Section 174 of the Code, Section 154, Section 174, Section 175(2, Section 186 CrPC, Section 174 CrPC, Section 157, the Constitution Bench, Section 154, Section 177, Section 177 of the Code, Section 177 of the Code, Section 181, Section 181, Section 190(1, Section 156 CrPC, section 174, Section 6, the DSPE Act, section 6, the DSPE Act, Section 6 of the Act, the Constitution Bench, Constitution, Constitution, Article 226 of the Constitution, Section 6, Section 6, Section 6, the DSPE Act, Section 5, Section 174 CrPC, Section 6, the DSPE Act, Article 142(1, Article 142, Article 142 of the Constitution

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, Bihar & Ors, Respondent(s, the Supreme Court Rules, Sections 341, IPC, the Rajeev Nagar Police Station, Patna, the Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate III, the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Sushant Singh Rajput, Bandra Police Station, CrPC, FIR, the Patna FIR, the Mumbai Police, FIR, State of Maharashtra, Solicitor General, Union of India, Complaint, State of Maharashtra, Complaint, Complaint, Patna, Complaint, Page 3, Complaint, Patna, CBI, Complaint, CBI, State, FIR, Complaint, the Mumbai Police, CBI, Court, the State of Bihar, Complaint, the Patna Police, FIR, the State of Bihar, the Mumbai Police, CrPC, Mumbai Police, the Complaint of the Respondent, the SIT of Bihar Police, Patna, the Mumbai Police, Page 5, FIR, the Mumbai Police, the Bihar Police, Complaint, the Bihar Government’s, CBI, CBI, CBI, the State of Bihar, CrPC, the Bihar Police, Patna, Court, the Patna Police, CrPC, the State of Maharashtra, Sushant Singh Rajput, Accidental Death Report(ADR, Post Mortem, FIR, The State of Maharashtra Counsel, Court, Dr Singhvi, Complaint, Complaint, the Complaint of Respondent, Maharashtra counsel, the Mumbai Police, Complaint, the Central Agency, the Bihar Police, CBI, CBI, Solicitor General, the Union of India, CBI, the Maharashtra Police, FIR, CrPC, FIR, the Mumbai Police, FIR, Patna, Central Agency, Solicitor General, the State of Bihar, CBI, FIR, the Directorate of Enforcement, the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, the Maharashtra Police, FIR, the Mumbai Police, CrPC, FIR, the State of Maharashtra, CBI, Court, the Mumbai Police, FIR, FIR, the Bihar Police, CBI, CBI, the Mumbai Police, the State of Maharashtra, the State of Maharashtra, CBI, the Central Agency, State, Bench, Union of India 2020 SCC Online SC462, Court, Court, CrPC, the Mumbai Police, the Patna Police, FIR, CBI, CrPC, Court, TRANSFER POWER UNDER SECTION406CRPC15 Section 406 CrPC, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, State of Tamil Nadu, Justice V R Krishna Iyer, Court, Court, another High Court, Court, Court, Court, the State of Tamil Nadu, Court, Court, CrPC, SCOPE OF SECTION174CRPC, FIR, FIR, The Mumbai Police, State of Chhatisgarh, Bench, the Mumbai Police, FIR, FIR, the Mumbai Police, Complaint, FIR, Patna, FIR, UP, FIR, CrPC, inter alia, SHO, Inspector of Police, Chennai & Anr, Criminal Breach of Trust and Misappropriation, Court, Justice S B Sinha, High Courts, Magistrate, Naresh Kavarchand Khatri Vs, Court, Supra).28, the Supreme Court, the Bombay High Court, Patna, Justice J S Khehar, the Division Bench, Samsung Corporation, Uttar Pradesh and Ors, offences.—(1)-(3, Page 25, Court, Patna, Complaint, Complaint, the Bihar Police, FIR, CBI, CBI, Patna, Complaint, FIR, Complaint, the State of Maharashtra, The Mumbai Police, CrPC, FIR, Complaint, CBI, Maharashtra Government, CBI, the Constitutional Courts, State, that:-, Court, Court, Court, CBI, Justice D K Jain, Committee for Protection of Democratic Rights, Parliament, Parliament, State, Court, Union, Court, State, CBI, State, Court, CBI, State, the High Court, the High Court, FIR, Patna, CBI, this Transfer Petition, CrPC, the Mumbai Police, State, CBI, CBI, Mumbai Police, Sushant Singh Rajput, FIR, Court, State, K.V. Rajendran Vs, CBCID, Chennai & Ors, Court, Court, CBI, Court, CBI, the State of Maharashtra.37, Uttar Pradesh and Others, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Sushant Singh Rajput, CBI, Life’s, Court, Court, CBI, Sushant Singh Rajput, CBI, The Transfer Petition, ROY

PERSON: JURISDICTION Transfer Petition, JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1, Order XXXIX, Patna Sadar, Bandra Mumbai, Bandra, Krishan Kishor Singh, Shyam Divan, Maninder Singh, Vikas Singh, A.M. Singhvi, R. Basant, Tushar Mehta, Shyam Divan, Complainant, Divan, Shyam Divan, Maninder Singh, Cheating, Vikas Singh, Complainant, Complainant, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Bandra, Singhvi, Singhvi, Singhvi, Tushar Mehta, Mehta, avoidable.10, Complainant, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Arnab Ranjan Goswami, Chander Singh Sagar, Anr, Chander Singh Sagar, Chander Singh Sagar, Anr, JURISDICTION, Complainant, Page, Complainant, Satvinder Kaur Vs, Arijit Pasayat, Abraham Ajith, Asit Bhattacharjee Vs, Asit Bhattacharjee, Altamas Kabir, Complainant, Lee Kun Hee, Sampat Lal, Ranganath Mishra, Bench, Bench, Monica Kumar, Anr, L.S. Panta Page, Complainant, Satyameva Jayate.41, HRISHIKESH

DATE: 2020, 2013, 2020, 1860, 35, 14.6.2020, last many years, a few days, 35, 1946, 35 5, 2002, 35 11, 35 13, 35 14, 1978, 35, 2016, 35, 2014, 35 24, 1999, 2004, 35 13, 2007, 1973, 35 22, 2010, 35 29, 2012, 1985, 2010, 35, 1946, 2013, 35, 2008, 35 39, 2020

PRODUCT: CrPC, CrPC.9

CARDINAL: 25.7.2020, 342, 380, 406, 420, 306, 506, 120B, 1, No.2, 8.6.2020, 2, No.2, No.3, No.4, 4, 35, 4, 174, 175, 27.07.2020, 35, 6, 35, 35, 56, zero, 8, 35, 35, 14.06.2020, two, two, 10, 56, 174, 35, 12, 13, One, 14, 35, 2, one, one, one, 2, 16, 16, 17, 35, 2, 9, 19, 18, 35, 174, 175, 22, 20, 19, two, 20, 35, 2, 120.1, 120.2, 21, 178, 8, 12, one, 25, 8, 12, 22, 26, 5, 21, 4, 23, 27, 1 SCC1, 27, 24, 3, 38, 181, 4, 35, 30, 26, 35, 1, 3, 13, 27, 35, 33, 3, 68, 226, 2, 80, 28, 34, 29, 35, two, two, 12, 3, 30, two, 8, 31, 35, 142, 45, 38, 32, 33, 35, 34, 35, 35, 35

GPE: Mumbai, Mumbai, India, Bandra, Mumbai, Bihar, Mumbai, Bihar, Bihar, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, 02.08.2020, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bihar, Mumbai, Mumbai, States, Bihar, India, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bihar, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar, Bihar, Mumbai, Bihar, us, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Lalita Kumari Vs, Delhi, Gujarat, Gujarat, Patna, South Korea, Mumbai, Bihar, Mumbai, Mumbai, Bihar, Bihar, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai

NORP: Maharashtra

ORDINAL: Seventh, first, second

WORK_OF_ART: The Code of Criminal Procedure clothes this Court

FAC: Manoj K Sharma, CrPC, Sections 177, Rasiklala Dalpatram Thakkar Vs

TIME: the hour

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //