Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Preet Pal Singh Vs. The State of Uttar Pradesh

Decided On : Aug-14-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 498A, Section 304B, Section 406, Section 3, the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 411, Section 313, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 313, Section 313 9, Section 389(3, Section 304B, Section 3, Section 389(1, the Indian Penal Code, Dowry Prohibition (Amendment) Act, Act 43 of 1986, Section 439, Section 389, Section 389(1, Section 389, the Indian Penal Code, the Dowry Prohibition Act, Section 389, Rs.2,50,000/- 16

CARDINAL: 1, 2, 21.01.2019, 23.7.2018, 498A, 406, 23.7.2018, Rs.15,000/-, 21.1.2019, 3, 5, two, 4, 8, 24/25.8.2010, 9, 406, 411, 11, 406, 5, 12, eight, five, 13, 14, 6, 15, 20, 17, three, one, 8, three, two, 406, 10, 11, 28, 1, 4, 1, 3 SCC112, 11.The, 32, 7, 7, 33, three, 6, 8, 16, 3, 38, 8, one, 43, 2020

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, CRL, No.2102, the Allahabad High Court, Criminal Misc, Criminal Appeal No.1594, the High Court, EC Act, the “Sessions Court, Sections 304B, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, the Sessions Court, IPC, Simple Imprisonment of, Life Imprisonment, IPC, Simple Imprisonment, IPC, Simple Imprisonment, Simple Imprisonment, Simple Imprisonment, Rs.5,000/- under Section 4, Simple Imprisonment of, the High Court, The High Court, State, the High Court, Court, Court, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act.10, the Sessions Court, Sections, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, IPC, FIR, CrPC, the Sessions Court, the High Court, the Sessions Court, Appellant, Appellant, IPS, CrPC, Mobile Services, Reliance Communications, 3rd Defence Witness, Defence, The Sessions Court, CrPC, IPC, Sections 3 and 4 of the Dowry The Respondent No.2’s, the Sessions Court, the High Court, the Sessions Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Suffice, the Sessions Court, the High Court, the Appellate Court, CrPC, inter alia, IPC, the Appellate Court, Court, Section 304B of the Code, Section 304B, Court, Singh & Ors.3, Section 304B, the Respondent-Accused, Court, Court, U.P., Uttar Pradesh and Anr.6, Court, U.P., U.P., U.P., Anr.9, Court, U.P., Court, the High Court, Court, U.P., CrPC, CrPC, Court, U.P., Court, Uttar Pradesh, Court, the Trial Court, the Respondent-Accused, the Sessions Court, the Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, CrPC, the High Court, the High Court, the Sessions Court, Appellant, FIR, FIR, the High Court

PERSON: Lucknow Bench, Sandeep Singh Hora, Lucknow, Criminal Misc, Sandeep Singh Hora, Sessions Trial No.1385, Sonia @ Disha Chhugani, Balvir Singh, Manjeet Kaur, Sonia @ Disha Chhugani, Rajendra Pal Kaur, Balvir Singh, Pritam Singh, died.16, whatsoever.20, K.K. Pandey, Gomti Nagar, Lucknow, Shri Prashant Mishra, Prashant Mishra, Prashant Mishra, Prashant Mishra, Prachi, Prachi, Prachi, Lajwanti Chugani, Sonia @ Disha Chhugani, Sonia, Balvir Singh, Manjeet Kaur, Sonia @ Disha Prohibition Act, Chugani, Balvir Singh, Pritam Singh, Kashmira Singh v. State, Babu Singh, Rs.2,50,000/-, Chadra Sarkar v., Rajesh Ranjan, Anr.4, Chaman Lal v. State, Anr.5.4, SCC5285, Mauji Ram v. State, Ajay Kumar Sharma v. State, Lokesh Singh v. State, Dataram Singh v. State, Lokesh Singh v. State, Anr, Kalyan Chadra Sarkar v., Rajesh Ranjan, Ajay Kumar Sharma, Bench, Chaman Lal v. State, Dataram Singh v. State, Anr, Singh Negi v. State, Rs.2,50,000/-, Rs.2,50,000/-

DATE: 2018, 2018, 2010, 1961, 2010, 3 years, Rs.10,000/-, 3 months, 3 years, 2 months, 5 years, 3 months, one year, 3 months, 2018, 2018, 2010, four weeks, today, today, about 8½ months, 12.12.2009, 25.8.2010, 2010, 304B, 2010, 23.7.2018, 12.12.2009, 17.6.2010, 24.8.2010, half day, under 18, 12.12.2009, 23.7.2008, 17.6.2010, 24.8.2010, 24.8.2010, three years, five years, 1986, 7 years, 1977, 1978, 1991, 8½ months, the day, two months, this 31, 2004, 2004, 2019, 2005, 2008, 2018, 7 or 8 months, 10 (2019, 1961, 42

LOC: the Respondent No.2, the Additional District, the Respondent No.2, the Respondent No.2, the Respondent No.2, the Respondent No.2

PRODUCT: Appellant, Appellant, Respondent No.2, 304B, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, I-10, I-10, 304B, I-10, I-10

TIME: the night, about 3.05 a.m., the evening, the same night, 12.15 a.m., the evening, The same night

GPE: Sitapur, Sonia, Disha, Sitapur, Kalyan, Ors.7, course.36, Vinod

ORDINAL: 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 5th, first

NORP: Pajero, Pajero, Punjab, Anr.8

QUANTITY: 30 cm x 1.5 cm

PERCENT: 7 SCC5078

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //