Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nasima Naqi Vs. Todi Tea Company Ltd.

Decided On : Nov-26-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 17(4B, Section 2(g, Section 3(f, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, Section 2(g, Section 2(g

CARDINAL: 1, 235.95, 12,000, two, 7, two, 10,000, 3, 4, 5 ii, 6, one, 9, 19-12-2018, 26, 11-2019

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, Versus Todi Tea Company Ltd and, the High Court of Calcutta, 2 Lane Bazar Street Calcutta-700001, the City Civil Court, Calcutta, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, the Calcutta Municipal Corporation, Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, The High Court, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Trial Court, The High Court, Court, the Trial Court, the High Court, the Registry of this Court, the State of West Bengal, Special Leave to Appeal, the High Court at Calcutta, NASIMA NAQI Petitioner(s, VERSUS TODI TEA COMPANY LTD, Respondent(s, Petitioner(s, Respondent(s, Adv, Adv, Adv, Court, ORDER Leave

DATE: 2019, 19 December 2018, 19971, monthly, 6 May 1988, July 2002, 2010, 10 July 2001, 13 December 2002, five years, 30 July 2010, 4 August 2017, 27,887.10, monthly, five years, five years, five years, 1997, five years, five years, five years, five years, five years, 8, seventeen years, 30 June 2020, four weeks, today, November 26, 2019 10, today

PERSON: Appellant(s, JUDGMENT, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, Ajay Rastogi, J.New Delhi, SECTION XVI S U P R E M E C O U R T O, No(s).1836/2019, D.Y. CHANDRACHUD, S. K. Bhattacharya, L.K. Paonam, Niraj Bobby Paonam, Tomthinnganbi Koijam, Ashok Kumar Jain, Amar Dave, Bijoy Kumar Jain

ORDINAL: first, first, second, second, second, second, first, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second, second

GPE: I.R., IA

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //