Suraj Jagannath Jadhav Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Dec-13-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 302, Section 304 Part II IPC, Section 302 IPC, Section 304 Part II, Section 300, Section 300, Section 302 IPC, Section 304 Part II IPC, Section 300, Section 302 IPC, Section 304 Part II IPC, Section 302, Section 304 Part II IPC, Section 300, Section 302 IPC, Section 304 Part II IPC, Section 304, Section 304 Part II, Section 300, Section 302

CARDINAL: 1, 3, 10, 4, 4.1, 4.2, 7, 4 SCC270, 6 5.1, 7, 5.2, 10 to 15, 11, 8, 9 13, 10, 10, two, 10, 86, 12, 13, 12, 11, 13, 2, 590, 129, 12 6

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICITON, No.1885, the High Court of Judicature, Criminal Appeal No.723, the High Court, Trial Court 2, IPC, Court, Court, State, Court, Court, State, Court, Santosh, Bhagwan Tukaram Dange, State of Maharasthra, Court, IPC, IPC, Court, IPC, Court, Santosh, Court, Court, Court, Santosh, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, IPC, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Santosh, Trial Court, the High Court, IPC

PERSON: Jagannath Jadhav, JUDGMENT M. R. Shah, Shri Sushil Karanjkar, Kalu Ram v. State, Ramakantrao Katneshwarkar, Kalu Ram, Shri Katneshwarkar, Kalu Ram, kerosene, Exception 4 to Section 300, kerosene lamp, Kalu Ram, Kalu Ram, Kalu Ram, Rajasthan, Kalu Ram, J.(ASHOK BHUSHAN, J.(M. R. SHAH

GPE: Bombay, Saraswatibai, Bhagwan, Bablu, para12, Bhagwan, New Delhi

DATE: 2013, 2000, 18 to 20 weeks, 2015, 2014, 2000, 2000, 10 15, 2000, 2006, 2007, 13 8, December 13, 2019

PERCENT: 60%

ORDINAL: Fourthly