m/s.rajankumar and Brothers (Impex) Vs. Oriental Insurance co.ltd.

Decided On : Feb-07-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Sirena 1, the Marine Cargo Clause, the Marine Insurance Act, Section 35(3, Section 35(3

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Rajankumar and Brothers, Impex, Versus Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Appellant, the Overseas Seller, Hangzhou Cogeneration, Co. Ltd., M/s Kirtanlal & Sons, the Marine Insurance Policy, the Institute Cargo Clauses, Institute War Clause, Institute Strike Clause, 20.7.2010, the Marine Insurance Policy, M/S. Smit Singapore Private Ltd., M/s Richard Hogg Lindley, GAA, General Average, Appellant, General Average Guarantee, The Principle of Indemnity in Marine Insurance Contracts, GAA, Respondent, the General Average, GAA, the General Average Guarantee, GAA, the General Average Guarantee, the ‘Institute Classification Clause, the Marine Insurance Policy, Salvors, Salvors, Salvors, the High Court, Appellant, the Mumbai Port Trust, Salvors, Appellant, NCDRC, NCDRC, NCDRC, Appellant, ICC, the Marine Insurance Policy, Lloyd’s Register of Shipping, Lloyd’s 7, NCDRC, Appellant, Appellant, the ‘International Register of Shipping’, Appellant, the Marine Insurance Policy, Institute Classification Clause, the Institute Marine Cargo Clause, the Marine Insurance Policy, the Cargo Clause, Appellant, the Overseas Seller, the General Average Guarantee, ICC, ICC, Appellant, Lloyd’s Register of Shipping, Indian Register of Shipping, International Register of Shipping, NCDRC, ICC, the General Average Guarantee, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, the General Average Guarantee, Appellant, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, ICC, the Joint Cargo Committee, the Lloyd’s Marketing Association, ICC, the Marine Insurance Policy, Marine Cargo Insurance, Classification Society, the International Association of Classification Societies, Qualifying Vessels, Underwriters, Classification Society, the International Association of Classification Societies, IACS, American Bureau of Shipping, A.B.S., China Classification Society, Croatian Register of Shipping, Indian Register of Shipping, Korean Register of Shipping, Lloyd’s Register, Nippon Kaiji Kyokai, Polish Register of Shipping, Italiano Navale, IACS, Quality Standards, IACS, IACS, QSCS, IACS, IACS, ICC, IACS, 3 International Association of Classification Societies, Quality System Certification Scheme, QSCS, ICC, Clause 5, NCDRC, ICC, ICC, ICC, ICC, ICC, ICC, Classification Society, ICC, Axa Insurance Singapore Pte Ltd, Wilcom, Wilcom, Wilcom, ICC, The Singapore Court of Appeal, Everbright Commercial Enterprises, Court, Mersey Marine Insurance Co Ltd v. H T Van Laun & Co, Liberian Insurance, ICC, ICC, ICC, ICC, Marine Reinsurance, ICC, AXA, Hellenic Shipping Registry, Honduras Shipping Registry, the Lloyd’s Register of Ships, Institute Cargo Clauses, Institute Cargo Clauses, Sirena 25, Everbright, Court, Court, ICC, Court, AXA, ICC, Everbright, AXA, AXA, Everbright, ICC, Court, Everbright, the Marine Insurance Policy, Nam Kwong Medicines & Health Products Co. Ltd., China Insurance Co. Ltd., ICC, The High Court, ICC, Court, Liberian Insurance Agency, The People’s Insurance Co. of, the International Register of Shipping, the High Court, International Register of Shipping, IACS, The High Court, the Singapore Court of Appeal, the High Court, the High Court, ICC, the High Court, ICC, ICC, ICC, Appellant, NCDRC, Indian Register of Shipping, the ‘International Register of Shipping’, the International Register of Shipping, the ‘Indian Register, See Indian Register of Shipping, irclass/., Appellant, the International Register of Shipping, Appellant, NCDRC, the Overseas Seller, Classification Society, the Institute Classification Clause, Lloyd’s 100A1, Court, ICC, IACS, the International Register of Shipping 35, INTLREG, IACS, the Indian Register of Shipping, Appellant, the ‘Indian Register of Shipping’, ICC, W.K. Webster & Co., Lloyd’s Register of Shipping, Respondents, the Singapore Court of Appeal, Appellant, ICC, Appellant, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, ICC, the Institute Cargo Clauses, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, the Marine Insurance Policy, Everbright Commercial Enterprises, the Marine Insurance Policy, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, ICC, Clause 5.2, the Marine Insurance Policy, ICC, the Singapore Court of Appeal, Everbright Commercial Enterprises, ICC, IACS, IACS, the Marine Insurance Policy, Appellant, Clause 5.2, Clause 5.2, General Average Guarantee, Marine Insurance, Appellant, General Average Guarantee, the General Average Guarantee, GAA, the General Average, Guarantee, the Marine Insurance Policy, General Average Guarantee, Guarantee, the General Average Guarantee, the General Average, the General Average Guarantee, ICC, the General Average Guarantee, ICC, K. Amishkumar Trading Pvt. Ltd., Viraj Impex Pvt. Ltd., Intervenors, NCDRC, Court, Intervenors, NCDRC, NCDRC, Appellant, Respondent, NCDRC

PERSON: JUDGMENT MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, Cover Note, Seller, lien, Guarantee, John Dunt, Det Norske, http://www.iacs.org.uk/quality/quality­system­certification­scheme­ qscs/, ICC18/97, Robert H Brown, Peter B Reed, Xxx 53 Reverting, Greenock, Anr, non­classed, Bilney, Mr Xie, Bartlett, Sussex, Ms Lui, Assured, Baris Soyer, Baijnath Melaram, .J.(MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, J.(K.M. JOSEPH

NORP: J.1, ICC0101/2001, Russian, English, Cavendish

CARDINAL: 12.11.2013, 1, 26.5.2010, 2.1, 80, 2, seven, 2.7.2010, 2.2, 6.7.2010, 3 2.3, 1, 161, 4, 3.8.2010, 2.4, 5.8.2010, 5, 2.5, 7.8.2010, 14, 3.9.2010, 2.12.2011, 6 2.6, 4.7.2012, 2.7, 9.8.2010, 3.1, 8, 6, 9, 3.2, 10, two, 11 5, 2009)166, 12, 1, 1.2, 1, 13 2.2, two, 12, 16, 5.1, 1, 17, 1, 4, 2, 167, 2, 167, 18, two, two, 19, 5.2, 6, 2, 168, 20, 9.5.1997, 21, 2, 22, 35, one, 127, 23, 49, two, 1, 26, one, 27, 2.7.2010, 5.4, 2, 28, 5.5, 4 HKLRD630, 29, 30, 172, 174, 31, 179, 1, 5, 181, 32, 5.6, 33, 5.7, 26.5.2010, 7, 8, 11.6.2010, 11.6.2010, one, 12, 5.8, 26.5.2010, 36, 9.8.2010, 5.9, 37, 36, 35, 38, 2, 3, 2, 3, 39, 6.1, 40, 41, 5.1, 5.2, 42, 6.3, 43, two, 6.4 Insofar, 9, 206­213, 44, 6.5, 26.5.2010, 209, 18.7.2010, 3.8.2010, 3.8.2010, 2, 2, 7, 9.8.2010, 6.6, three, No.4, No.5, 27.10.2017, 48

FAC: the Appellant herein.2, Mumbai Port, Mumbai Port, Mumbai Port, Mumbai Port, the Appellant’s losses.4, Kam Hing Trading, Kam Hing Trading, Kam Hing Trading

MONEY: 12,63,712.50 US Dollars, 25 per cent, 256,880 US dollars, 591

GPE: China, I.R.S., Hong Kong, China, Mumbai, Mumbai, Mumbai, London, I.R.S., I.R.S., London, C.R.S., I.R.S., K.R., L.R., P.R.S., R.S., non­IACS, Singapore, Hong Kong, Tuticorin, India, Mosse, Greece, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, Kam Hing, Hong Kong, Hong Kong, I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., London, I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., I.R.S., Clauses 4, I.R.S.

PRODUCT: Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent, Appellant, Respondent

DATE: March 1985, 27.7.2010, 2007, 20.8.2010, 13.8.2010, 24.8.2010, 2.2.2012, 2.12.2011, 21.6.2012, 10.10.2007, more than 25 years old, 18.7.2010, 10.10.2007, 07.08.2010, 2001, 10 years of age, 15 years of age, 25 years of age, 30 years of age, 25 years, Feb. 2, 2020, 1978, 1978, 1978, 2001, 2.7.1998, 1917, 1977, 1981, 2 July 1998, 2 July 1998:24, 54, 2002, 2010, 27 December 2007, more than 30 years old, 10.10.2007, 1963, 1963, non­classed, 2001, 5, 6, 3.8.2010, 46, 47, 2016, 2016, 2020

QUANTITY: 2000 Metric Tonnes, 15 evolution

LOC: Caofeidian Port, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, the Solomon Islands, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

TIME: the midnight, 45 midnight

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant, 57 In, Clause 5 of the ICC, INTLREG’.7 Whereas ‘I.R.S., Nam Kwong Medicines, Intervention Applications No.3

ORDINAL: First, Second, first, first, second, first, second, first, 1st, 2nd, first, second, first, second

LANGUAGE: English

EVENT: the 1963 Act