Yashwant Sinha Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation Through Its Director

Decided On : Nov-14-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Section 340 Cr, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Article 32 of the Constitution of India, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Section 340, Article 137, Constitution, Article 145, Rule 1 of the Supreme Court Rules]., Article 137, Article 137, Order 40 Rule2, Order 47 Rule 1, Order 47, the Explanation to Rule 1, Order 47, Order 47 Rule 1, Article 226, Article 226, Article 137 of the Constitution of India, Article 137 of the Constitution, Article 145, Order 47 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 40 Rule 1, Constitution, Article 137 of the Constitution, Article 137 of the Constitution, Article 145, Order XL Rule 1, the Constitution Bench, Article 137 of the Constitution, Article 137 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article 136 of the Constitution, Article 137 of the Constitution, Section 154, the Constitution 51 Bench, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Article 137 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, a Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, the Constitution Bench, Article 32 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 32 of the Constitution, Article 32 of the Constitution, Constitution Bench, The Constitution Bench, Section 154

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL/CRIMINAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION Review Petition, YASHWANT SINHA & ORS, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION Through, DIRECTOR & ANR, I.A. No.69008/2019, I.A. No.71047/2019, PIL-W, I.A. No.182576/2018, PIL-W, PIL-W, U/S340OF CRPC, PIL-W, PIL-W, I.A. No.63168/2019, J.(I.A. No.63168/2019, PIL-W, The Union of India, Court, Court, Court, CAG, CAG, PAC, Parliament, CAG, PAC, CAG, CAG, the Public Accounts Committee, Parliament, CAG, CAG, PAC, Parliament, R.P., PIL-W, PIL-W, U/S340OF CRPC, PIL-W, Court, the Union of India.12, Court, Court, Court, Review Petition, FIR, Court, Court, Court, CAG, Court, the Defence Acquisition Council, Sovereign Guarantee, the Defence Procurement Procedure, the Indian Negotiating Team, Reliance Aerostructure Limited, Court, Court, PIL-W, the Indian National Congress, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Air Force, the Supreme 12 Court, the Supreme Court, Chowkidar, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, BJP, Parliament, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, I.A. No.71047/2019, Ranjan Gogoi, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA INHERENT JURISDICTION, Review Petitions, Contempt Petition, Writ Petition (Criminal, inter alia, FIR, Court, e. Issue, CBI, Review Petition (Criminal, Writ Petition (Criminal, SIT, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, the Rafale Fighter Jets, Fighter Jets, the Reliance Defence, Reliance Entertainment, the Julie Gayet’s Rouge International, Reliance Defence, Dassault, FIR, Court, the Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited, DRAL, the Public Sector Company Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, the Indian Offset Partner of Dassault, Review Petition (Criminal, Writ Petition (Criminal) No.1205, the Union of India and Government of France, the Rafale Fighter Jets, UPA Government, the Hon’ble Supreme Court, Review, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, IOP, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, OEM, Court, Press, the Indian Government, IOP, the Indian Government, Court, the Indian Government, Court, Emphasis, the Review Petitions and Applications, Review Petition (Criminal) No.46, Review Petition (Criminal) No.46, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, the Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, the Union of India, the Writ Petition, DPP, DPP, the IAF Service Headquarters, SQR, Committee, Hindustan Aeronautics Limited, The Defence Acquisition Council, Acceptance of Necessity, Dassault’s Rafale, IAF, Dassault Aviation and HAL, Dassault, Defence Procurement Procedure, Reliance Defence Limited, DPP, CBI, the Prevention of Corruption Act, FIR, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Court, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, FIR, Writ Petition, Court, Court, the Review Petition, Court, the Indian Negotiating Team, INT, CAG, CAG, the Public Accounts Committee, Parliament, Application, Application for Correction, the Government of India, the Review Petitions, Court, Reliance, Court, Reliance, CAG, CAG, INT, CAG, Government to Government, CAG, inter alia, the French Government, Committee, Governments of France, Court, Court, the Supreme Court of India, the Supreme Court Subject, Parliament, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court Rules, The Supreme Court Rules, the Advocate on Record, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, CPC, Court of Small Causes, Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Registrar, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, CPC, Emphasis, State Through, CBI, SIT, Chennai 4, the High Court, the High Court, CPC, Emphasis, Jain Studios Ltd., Shin Satellite Public Co., Chambers, Shin Satellite Public Co. Ltd., Jain Studios, the Arbitration Petition, Emphasis, State, Court, inter alia, Emphasis, others9, Court, Chettiyar, Rex v. Northumberland Compensation Appeal Tribunal, the Privy Council, Court, Emphasis, Court, Court, Statute, Court, Emphasis, Court, Statute, Court, Court, Emphasis, Judicial, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Judicial, Judicial, Emphasis, M/s. Northern India Caterers (, Delhi14, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Parliament, Supreme Court Rules, Court, SCR933.9, Additional Solicitor General, Court, the Bengal Finance, Court, S. Nagaraj, Justice, Court, Court, Court, Court, Bench, First Division Assistants, State, Court, State, Court, Court, the Privy Council, the House of Lords, Court, the Privy Council, Rajunder Narain Rae v., Court, Courts, The House of Lords, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court Rules this Court, Court, Court, Emphasis, S. Nagaraj(supra, Union of India, Haryana State Industrial Development Corporation Limited, Mawasi, Usha Bharti, State of Uttar Pradesh, Court, Chhajju Ram v. Neki, Court, Union of India, Sandur Manganese & Iron Ores Ltd., SC275 20.2, the Union of India, Court, Court, Court, The Supreme Court Rules, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court Rules, Registrar, Court, Chambers, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Court, Court, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, Court, FIR, FIR, FIR, the General Diary/Station Diary/Daily Diary, FIR, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, Bench, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Explanation, Court, Statute, Statute, Court, CPC, Explanation, the Law Commission of India, 54th Report, The Law Commission, the Kerala High Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Chambers, Jain Studios Ltd., Court, Jain Studios Ltd., Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, FIR, Court, Court, Court, the Government of India, Writ Petition (Criminal, Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, the Government of the day, The Government of India, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Indian Government, IOP, the Indian Government, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, Court, Court, Court, Court, DPP, Offset Guidelines, Court, Court, Court, Court, FIR, Court, the Indian Business Group, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Offset Clause, OEM/Vendor, the Indian Offset Partner, the Ministry of Defence, Court, Reliance Aerostructure Ltd., Reliance Company, Dassault, the Indian Government, the French Government, the Indian Government, IOP, Dassault, the Indian Government, Government, Dassault, Court, Press Release, Reliance Company, Dassault, the Review Petition, Court, Reliance Industries, Reliance Infrastructure, Reliance Aerostructure Limited, RAL, the Offset Contract, Reliance Infrastructure Limited, Dassault Aviation, Court, Reliance Company, Dassault, Reliance Company, Reliance Industries, Reliance Infrastructure, RAL, the Indian Government, IOP, the Indian Government, Court, Court, Court, King-Emperor, the Privy Council, Lordships, Court, S. 491, Court, the State Government, Court, CBI, Court, Court, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, CBI, the 73 Prevention of Corruption Act, FIR, Court, Writ Petition (Criminal, Court

DATE: 2019, 2018, MA582019 182576/2018, 14.12.2018, 31.10.2018, 1973, today, 10.10.2018, today, 10.4.2019, 13 28, 30.4.2019, 14 31, 34, November 14, 2019, 1973, 2019, 2018, the 04th of October, 2018, 2019, 2018, 23-09-2016, 2019, 2018, 26.02.2019, 2019, 2019, 2018, 2011, March of 2014, 25.03.2015, 28.03.2015, twelve days 12, 1988, 1988, 2018, 2014, to.14, 2018, 2013, 1966, Order XL, thirty days, 1908, 19, 1980, 22, 4, 1999, 2006, 1952, 27 27, 11 1986, December 7, 1967, May 25, 1965, 1979, 1965, 1965, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1971, 1966, 1975, 1 SCC674:1975, 1975, 1941, 1993, 1940, 1941, 1836, 35, 16 (2000, 2012, 2013, 2014, 2017, 38, 1921-22, 1922, 1955, 2013, 2013, 2013, 39, 2002, AIR1960SC13741 40, 2013, 44 44, 46 45, 47, 2018, later than one week, 3 months', 7 days, 49, 54, 1976, 54 55, 56, 20.2(ix, the day, 2018, 62, 2018, 28, 32, the year 2012, 67 69, 32, the year 2012, 2012, the year 2012, 33, 72, 1980, 2003, 2018, 2018, later than a week, three months, 2005, 6 SCC1 2005, 1369, 76

PERSON: Versus, I.A. No.69009/2019, W.P.(C, No.46/2019, I.A. No.66253/2019, JUDGMENT SANJAY KISHAN KAUL, I.A. No.66253/2019, No.46/2019, W.P.(C, reliance, No.46/2019, Rahul Gandhi, Chowkidar, Narendra Modi, Anil Ambani, Modi, Gandhi, I.A. No.69009/2019, Kishan Kaul, K.M. JOSEPH, J.1, Order, Sanjay Kishan Kaul, b. Issue, c. Issue, Rafale Fighter Jets, Reliance Defence, Rafale Fighter Jets, Rafale Fighter Jets, Rafale Fighter Jets, Order, Anil Ambani, Lalita Kumari, Mukesh, Lalita Kumari, Order XLVII, Order XLVII, Bench, Order XLVII Rule 1, Eswara Iyer, Haridas Das, Usha Rani Banik, Kamal Sengupta, Moran Mar Basselios, Catholicos, Mar Poulose, Athanasius, Patanjali Sastri, Govinda Varadappa, Shaw, Certiorari, Girdhari Lal Gupta v., D.N. Mehta, another10, Daddan Singh, Chandra Kante, Sheikh Habib12, Supp, Tuleshwar Sharma, Aribam Pishak Sharma, Sajjan Singh v. State, G.L. Gupta v., D.N. Mehta, O.N. Mohindroo v. Distt, Chandra Kante, Habib, Administrative Law, Lal Choudhury v. Sukhraj Rai, Order XL, Order XLVII Rule 1, Lily Thomas, Kamlesh Verma v. Mayawati, Vikram Singh Alias, Vicky Walia, Kamlesh Verma, Moran Mar Basselios, Catholicos, Mar Poulose, Athanasius, Mukesh, Vikram Singh, Rupa Ashok, Hurra, Ashok Hurra, XLVIII thereof], Certiorari, Satyanarayan Laxminarayan Hegde, Mallikarjun Bhavanappa, Certiorari, Order XLVII Rule 1, Vishnu Kamath v., Ahmad Ishaque, Others23, wherein, Batuk K. Vyas v. Surat, Girdhari Lal Gupta, governed.48, Ayyazhiveettil Lakshmi Amma’s, Kuttan, Bench, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Mukesh Ambani, Anil Ambani, Anil Ambani, Nazir Ahmad Khwaja25, Abraham, Jacob Mathew, Jacob Mathew v. State of Punjab

GPE: I.A. No.69006/2019, W.P.(Crl, W.P.(Crl, I.A., W.P.(Crl, O.T., I.A., O.T., O.T., I.A., O.T., W.P.(Crl, WP, W.P.(Crl, W.P.(Crl, I.A., F.I.R., C.B.I., F.I.R., France, W.P.(Crl, India, I.A. No.69006/2019, New Delhi, C.B.I., India, French Republic, French Republic, India, India, India, Dassault.12, Lalita Kumari v. Government, fit.5, P.N., P.N., Denning, L.J., Deo, Sow, Aribam, Delhi, Karnataka, Sahai, Raja Prithwi, Registrar.43, Chagla, Lalita Kumari, hold:120, Thadikulangara Pylee's, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari, India, C.P.C., M.C., Lalita Kumari, Lalita Kumari

CARDINAL: 1, 2 2, two, 25, 36, 4, 3 5, two, 25, 4 8, 5, 14.12.2018, two, 6 13, 34, three, 14, One, 7, three, three, 17, 8, 19, 20, 9, three, 21, 10, 22, one, two, two, 11, 26, 22.4.2019, 8.5.2019, one, one, 20, 8.5.2019, 15 33, 16, 1 2, four, three, 2, 4, 126, 36, more than 1500, 4, only 36, 126, 36, 126, 24.06.2015, 5, 6, 36, 7, three, four, 15, 15, 15, three, 8, 8, 33, 9, three, 36, 9, 10, 2018.11, 126, six, 11, 108, 126, 36, 36, 126, 10.04.2015, 1, 2, 14, 2, 8, 36, 16, REVIEW, 137, 18, 18, 19, 1, 1, 2, 21, 34, 3, 4, 9, 13, two, 5, 4, 24, 11, 2, 25, 21, 8, 8, 26, 36, 17, 2, 351-52, 16, 10, 1, 29, 1, 31, Two, 4, two, two, one, 13, 8, 9, 8, 1, 3, 279, 3, 3, 2, 27, 14(1980, 2, 200, 3, two, only one, 32, 33, 18, 15, 4, one, 34, 2, 1, 1, 175, 35, 36, 16, 6, 19, 20, 20, 1., 17, 7, 8, 7, 8, 49, 16, 8, 39, two, 37, 38, 40, two, 22, 21, 4, two, 42, two, 43 42, 23, 23, two, 133, one, two, 48, 120, 120, 1, 120.2, 120.3, 49, 120.4, 120.5, 120.6, 50 120.7, 120.8, 36, 136, three, 52, 53, 1, 24, 12.11.2013, 56, 57, 58, two, two, 59, two, four, 60, 61, One, 63, 64, 2018.67, one, 65, 4.3, 32, two, 36, two, 68, 69, 25, 26, 13, 1, 272, 73, 26, 2, 120, 120.1, 120.5, 120.2, 120.3, 120.2, 120.5, 74, 120.6, 120.6, 120.6, 115, 119, 115, One, 35, 51-52, 51

PRODUCT: Rafale, Respondent No.1, Rafale Fighter Jets, Rafale Fighter Jets, Rafale Fighter Jets 5, the Rafale Fighter Jets, Rafale Fighter Jets, Report, Rafale, Discovery, IA144, Constitution Bench, Report, Bench, Statute

ORDINAL: first, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

FAC: I.A. No.69008/2019, Suthendraraja Alias Suthenthira Raja Alias Santhan, Deo Narain Singh, Kamlesh Verma

LOC: the Respondent No.2, Govt, Govt, Institutions, Single

NORP: d., Rekhanti Chinna, others13, Hari, Mandamus, Mandamus, French, French

QUANTITY: 3 i.

WORK_OF_ART: Hindustan was Aeronautics Limited, Advanced Fighter Aircrafts

MONEY: 70 per cent, 2.86 per cent, 20 Constitution Bench