Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shankar Sakharam Kenjale(d) by Lrs. Vs. Narayan Krishna Gade .

Decided On : Apr-17-2020

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Abolition Act, Section 4, Section 4, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act, the Abolition Act, Section 90, the Indian Trust Act, Section 3 of the Abolition Act, the Watan Act, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Watan Act, Section 3, Section 4, Section 5, the Watan Act, Section 5, the Watan Act, Section 5, section 15, Section 8, Section 8, Agricultural Lands Act, Agricultural Lands Act, Agricultural Lands Act, Section 3(3, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Watan Act, the Abolition Act, Section 8, the Abolition Act accords, Agricultural Lands Act, Section 3(3, Section 8, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, Section 8, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, Section 4, Section 4-A, the Watan Act, the Abolition Act, Section 4, Section 4(1, Section 4(1, the Abolition Act, Section 4(1, the Abolition Act, Section 4(1, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, the Abolition Act, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 90, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act, the Abolition Act, Agricultural Lands Act, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act, the Indian Trusts Act, Section 90, Section 90, Indian Trusts Act, Section 90, the Indian Trusts Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the High Court of Judicature, the High Court, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, the Trial Court, Paragana watan, the Bombay Hereditary Offices Act, Respondents, Mirashi, Mirashi, the Bombay Paragana, Kulkarni Watans (Abolition, Government, Shankar Sakharam Kenjale, Regular Civil Suit, Junior Division, Mirashi, Government, Satara in Civil Appeal No.25, The District Court, the Trial Court, Mirashi, Mirashi, Respondents, the High Court of Judicature, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, Mirashi, Court, Namdev Shripati Nale v., Learned Counsel, Court, Collector of South Satara, Government, Mirashi, Respondents, Court, Namdev Shripati Nale, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, mortgagor’s (Respondents, Mirashi, incidents.—With, watan rights.—(1, the Bombay Tenancy, the Bombay Tenancy, the Bombay Tenancy, Mirashi, Government, Mirashi, the Bombay Tenancy Act, the Abolition Act.10, Holder of watan, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Government, the Bombay Land Revenue Code, the State Government, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, the three Courts, the Government Orders, Court, Court, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, Mirashi, Respondents, Mirashi, Mirashi, the Bombay Tenancy, Court, Mirashi, Court, Government, Mirashi, the Revenue Authorities, Namdev Shripati Nale, the applicability of Section 90, Court, Court, Collector of South Satara, Malikarjunappa Basavalingappa Mamle Desai, Namdev Shripati Nale, the High Court, Respondents, the Trial Court, the First Appellate Court, REDDY

PERSON: MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR, No.439, Ramchandra, Ramchandra, Shankar Sakharam Kenjale, Shankar Kenjale, No.439, Dnyanu Mhoprekar, Krishna Babaji Patil, Bapu Ganapati Jagtap, Appellants, Mahadev Deshpande, Malikarjunappa Basavalingappa, Desai v. Siddalingappa & Others, Mhoprekar, G.R.R.D. No.2760-III-48820-L, watandar, Mhoprekar, Ramachandra, Appellants, Mhoprekar, Mritunjoy Pani, Narmanda Bala Sasmal, K.K. Mathew, Mohd, Nabia Yathu, Dnyanu Mhoprekar, J.(MOHAN M. SHANTANAGOUDAR

NORP: J.1, watan, watans, watans, watans, watans, watans, watan

DATE: 08.06.2009, 1987, 1874, 14.05.1947, ten years, 1950, 17.05.1956, the year 1960, 1978, 1984, 24.03.1987, 1987, 1882, 1985, 1997, 1964, 1973, 1882, the day, 1948, 1948, 1948, the day, 1948, the day, five years, the period of, five years, five years, five-year, May 3, 1957, November 23, 1960, 17.05.1956, 03.05.1957, 17.05.1956, 17.05.1956, 14.05.1947, 1882, 1882, 1882, 1948, 1882, 182.41, 18 19, 1882, 1962, 1963, 20 21, April 17, 2020 21

GPE: Bombay, watan, Ramchandra, Paragana, Kulkarni, Paragana, Kulkarni, watan, watan, watan, Vaduj, Bombay, Jayasingh, Jayasingh, Ramchandra, Ramchandra, Parganas, Kulkarni, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, Ramchandra, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, watan, Ramchandra, Jayasingh, watan, Jayasingh, Jayasingh, New Delhi

ORDINAL: Second, second, Second, second, first, first, first, first, first, first

CARDINAL: 1, 1, one, 2.2, one, 2.3, 25.01.1951, 2, 2.4, 2.5, 3, one, 2.6, 4 2.7, 4, 5, 2, 3, 6 6, 25.01.1951, 1, 2, 3, 4, 2, 9 9, 1, twelve, 10, six, 2, 1, 3, 1, 2, 11, 1879.11, 12, 23.11.1960, 17.05.1956, 23.11.1960, 5, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 9, 6, 19, 1, 225, 20

FAC: Bhawani Raje Ghadge

LOC: the District Judge

EVENT: the Indian Trusts Act

PRODUCT: Lordship

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //