Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Gateway Impex Pvt. Ltd. Vs.tata Aig Life Insurance Co. Ltd.

Decided On : Sep-23-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, the Lease Deed., Page 10, Page 11, Section 74, Section 73, the Contract Act, Section 28(3, Page 13, Section 73 and Section 74, the Contract Act, Page 15, Section 34, Section 34, Section 28(3, the Arbitration Act, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 74, the Indian Contract Act, Section 74, Section 74, the Contract Act, Page 27, Section 74, the Contract Act

CARDINAL: 192/2016, 09.2019, 09.2019, 20.11.2014, 3, 7(g).2, 3, 1, 30, 6.7.2007, 2, 30, 8.7.2009, 20.12.2004, 2, 3, 4, 5, 3, 30, 6, 11, 15.3.2011, 05-11-2009, 2, 18,54,979/-, 04-11-2009, 3, 14,12,040/-, 4, 5, 1.75, 05-11-2009, 4, 83,426, 05-11-2009, 2,89,973/-, 38,663/-, 04-11-2009, 1,62,591/-, 77,124/-, 04-11-2009, 94,271/-, 20,000/-, 8, 9, 10, 5, 14,12,040/-, 1.75, 04-11-2009, 83,426/-, 11, 12, 2.25, 04-11-2009, 77,124/-, 94,271/-, 13, 14, 88,92,531/-, 6, 05-11-2009, 16, two, two, two, One, 20.11.2014, 3,57,45,058/-, 6, 7, two, two, two, two, two, Rs.75,000/-, 6, one, 8, 30, 32, two, 6, 9, 30, 84.50, 85/-, 05-11-2009, 14,28,850/-, 16,810/-, 3,57,45,058/-, 49, 05.11.2009, 49, 30, 12,56,548/-, 50, 13, 6, 30, 4, 1, 5, 79.24, 6, 12, 30, two, 9126.27, 3, 11, 4, 5, 14, 2, 05.11.2009, 01.10.2010, 5, 7, 5.11.2009, 16, 30, 6, Seventy five thousand, 17, 30, 3, 84.50/-, 85/-, 85/-, 18, 30, 42, three, 42.3, 3, 19, 11, 225, 112, 8, 4, 5, 561, 10, 3, 818, 581-82, 17, 20, 30, 4, AIR1985SC1156, 45, 320-21, 43, two, 18, 10, 4, 16, 4, 459, one, 43, 21, 43, 4, 459, 43, One, one, one, 5, 2, 406, 40, 22, 30, one, 47, 41, two, 23, 30, 11, 2, 11, 24, 30, 8, 25,000, 24,000, 24,000, two, 25, 30, 45, 43.1, 26, 30, 46, 30, 104, 28, 30, 29, 30, 105, 10-6-2003, 331, 807, 200, 149, 271, one, 50, 30, 30

PERSON: Ravi Shankar, Manish Verma, Aman Bhatnagar, JYOTI SINGH JYOTI SINGH, Award, Award, Nos, Award, additional, Claimant, b. Rs, c. Rs, d. Rs, b. Rs, c. Rs, d. Rs, e. Rs, f. Rs, Claimant, Pandit, Rahul Dhanotia, SCC394 c. M/s, Maya Devi, SCC49 b. McDermott, SCC181 c., e. Monet Ispat, Balkishan Dass, Nos, Lessee, Lessor, Lessee, Lessee, XXXXXX, Supp, Gobardhan Das, Lachhmi Ram, Thawardas Pherumal v. Union, Jivarajbhai Ujamshi, Sheth v., Chintamanrao Balaji, Ram Saran, D.J.Parson, D.J.Parson, Hudson Formula, Engineering Contracts, Hudson Formula, Dipankar Gupta, Cir, Charles G. William Construction Inc., Cir

ORG: TATA AIG LIFE INSURANCE CO. LTD, Swati Sinha &, the Arbitral Tribunal, Lotus Towers Community Centre, Rs.50/-, 30.9.2007, 30.9.2007, Arbitration, Arbitrators, Court, The Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, OMP, Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, O.M.P., Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, O.M.P., the Security Deposit, Claimant, Claimant, O.M.P., respectively.14, The Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, CW-1, Tribunal, Learned Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, under:-"Mesne Profits, Claimant, the High Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Delhi Development Authority, R.S. Sharma and Company, Tribunal, Kailash Nath Associates, Delhi Development Authority & Anr, Reliance Communication Ltd., Pawan Hans Helicopters Limited, M/s Maritime Energy Heli Air Services Pvt. Ltd., Lalta Prasad, e. Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Co. Ltd., New Garage and Motor Co. Ltd., 75,000/-, Tribunal, a. Puri Construction Pvt. Ltd., Larsen & Toubro Ltd., the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Tribunal under Section 34, Reliance, Delhi Development Authority, Burn Standard Co. Ltd. & Ors, Kailash Nath Associates, Delhi Development Authority & Anr, d. Oil & Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Saw Pipelines Ltd., Energy Ltd., M/s. Aneja Construction (India) Ltd., O.M.P., Learned Counsel, a. Union of India, Raman Iron Foundry, Fateh Chand, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal.39, The Apex Court, Associate Builder (Supra, Court, Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, McDermott International Inc., Burn Standard Co. Ltd., McDermott International Inc., Burn Standard Co., SCC181, Court, Oil and Natural Gas Commission, Sharma v. Union, D.D., Court, AIR, Kishorilal Gupta & Bros., Alopi Parshad & Sons Ltd., Union of India, Renusagar Power Co. Ltd., General Electric Co., Union 1955 SC468, Court, the High Court, Court, Sumitomo Heavy Industries Ltd., ONGC Ltd., O.M.P., Sumitomo, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Apex Court, Raman Iron Foundry, Court, The Indian Legislature, The Apex Court, Fateh Chand, Court, The Indian Legislature, O.M.P., Court, Court, Court, Kailash Nath Associate (Supra, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, O.M.P., Courts, Court, the Apex Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Apex Court, McDermott International Inc., Arbitral Tribunal, MII, the Mechanical Contractors Association of America, × Contract, Building Contracts and Practice, × Contract, the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals, Eichleay Corporation, The Eichleay Formula, the Federal Circuit Courts of America, Nicon Inc., USCA Fed Cir, Fed, Gladwynne Construction Co., City Council of Baltimore, Fed, AK/rd/ JYOTI SINGH

NORP: J.1, 8th Floor, contra, American, American

DATE: 1996, 4, 5, 6, 4.9.2019, 4, 5, 6, 4.9.2019, 20.12.2004, 16810, three years, 1.10.2004, 1.10.2004, three years, 36 months, monthly, 23.10.2007, 15 days, 1.10.2007, 26.11.2007, 20.12.2004, six years, three years, another three years, three years, three years, three years, the end of three years, 1.10.2004, 26.7.2010, 3103-2008, 01-04-2009, 01-01-2006, 30-09-2007, 30 6, November 2007, 01-11-2009, 11-2009, the period March 2007, April 2004, 11-2009, July 2008, April 2004, 04-11-2009, the period 2004 to 2006, January 2006 to September 2007, October 2007, March 2007, November 2009, October 2007, October 2007, April 2004 to November 2009, July 2008, 04-11- 2009, April 2004, the year 2004 to 2006, 30 15, 24.10.2007 and 15.12.2008, monthly, the period 1.10.2007, 30 16, monthly, between the years 2007 to 2010, 2009, 2004, monthly, three years, 25 months, five days, 2008, 2015, 2011, 2017, Del 8773, 2015, 1915, 2015, 2015, 2006, 2015, 2003, 2017, Del 7951, 30 28, 1974, 2007-2009, 20.12.2004, three years, 31.05.2010, decided.34, 1.10.2007, 36, the expiry of three years, the 1996 Act, 1)-(2, 2006, 112-13, 2003, 2004, 44, 2011, 2012, 1984, 2012, 43-45, 2009, 2009, 2010, 11, 2010, 30 45, 2010, 11, 2010, 2009, 2009, 48, 42, 1974, 18, 44, 1000, 46, 46, 47, 2004, weekly, weekly, 2003, 25-9-2002, 2001, SEPTEMBER23d , 2019

PRODUCT: Lease Deed, area.4, No.4, Respondent, No.1, Chitty

ORDINAL: 7th, 3rd, 9th, Secondly, 3rd, 9th, third, second, first, first

GPE: New Delhi, occupation.50, New Delhi, SCC588, 08.07.2009, India, India, SAIL, Kwality Corpn, India, America, United States

PERCENT: 15%, 12%, 12%, 15%, 15%, 30%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 15%, 30%

QUANTITY: 30 a. Rs, 01-10-2007

TIME: 21-12-, 01-1 0·2004

WORK_OF_ART: the Lease Deed, Change Orders

LOC: Dewan Chand, the Emden Formula, Hudson, the Emden Formula

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

MONEY: 1,109,500

FAC: the Emden Formula

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //