Zee Entertainment Enteprises Ltd vs.saregama India Ltd

Decided On : Sep-11-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Page 1, the Commercial Courts Act, the Commercial Courts Act, Order VII Rule 14, Page 5, Order VII Rule 14(3, Page 10

DATE: September, 2019, 1674/2016, October, 2017, 1674/2016, 02.04.1995, 02.04.1995, Del 8367, 2017, 2015, 23rd December, 2016, 17th July 2017, 11th December, 2018, 21st January, 2019, 29th January, 2019, 18th March, 2019, 8th May, 2019, Del 4279, 1993, 2016, 1674/2016, 10 12, 2015, 10 17, 1674/2016, 1674/2016 21, 14th October, 2019, 2019, 1674/2016

ORG: ZEE ENTERTAINMENT ENTEPRISES LTD, CPC, Plaintiff, Court, the Additional Evidence, M/s, Bombay Finvest Enterprises and M/s Essel Vision, Negative &, the Additional Evidence Affidavit as Exhibit PW119, M/s, Bombay Finvest Enterprises and M/s Essel Vision, Negative &, M/s Essel Vision, Reliance, Texmaco Infrastructure and Holding Limited 2019, Sadhu Forging Ltd., Continental Engines Ltd., Sadhu Forging Ltd., Court, Court, CPC, Court, Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A. Vs, Essar Industries 2016 SCC OnLine, the Commercial Courts Act, Societe Des Produits Nestle S.A., Suffice, CPC, Court, CPC, CPC, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Legislature, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW

PERSON: Joy Basu, Petal Chandhok, Kanak Bose, Smridhi Sharma, Kriti, Mudit, POA Holder, Versus SAREGAMA, Vikas Mehta, Ankur Sangal, Sucheta Roy, Richa Bhargava, RAJIV SAHAI, No.12490/2019, Affidavit, Nitin Gupta Vs, Nitin Gupta, Order XI Rule, Anurag Bedi, Anurag Bedi, Anurag Bedi, Anurag Bedi, Order XI Rule, Order XI Rules, Order XI Rule, Order XI Rule, Order XI Rule, Harsh Tripathi, Anurag Bedi, Anurag Bedi, Anurag Bedi

CARDINAL: 1, 4., 3, 4, 3, 10, two, one, 4, 5, 29, 18, 19, two, 2, 10, 19, 1(4, one, 3, 10, two, 1(3, 6, 41, 43, 4, 1 to 3, 10, 1(5, 6, 10, 7, 10, 1(5, 2, 8, 3, 4, two, 1(3, 6, 9, 10, five, 10

ORDINAL: 9th, first

PRODUCT: Application

WORK_OF_ART: Dil Ka Heera, Dil Ka Heera‟

GPE: Sacchai, Del 10039.6, Nitin Gupta, Nitin Gupta