Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Religare Enterprises Limited vs.deputy Commissioner of Income Tax & Anr

Decided On : Aug-28-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Page 1, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Circle 21, Section 142, the Income Tax Act, Section 141, Section 142, Section 142, Section 142, Article 226, the Finance Act, Section 142(2A, Section 142, Section 142, the Finance Act, Section 142, Page 10, Article 14 of the Constitution, Page 11, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 14, Article 14, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 142(2A, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Page 14, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Page 15, Section 142(2A).37, the Finance Act, Section 142(2A, Section 142(2A, Page 16, Section 142 of the Act, Section 142, Section 142, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Article 226, Article 226, Article 226, the Income Tax Act, Page 24, the Income Tax Act, Section 142, the Income Tax Act, Section 142(1, Section 143, Section 142

MONEY: $~59 &

CARDINAL: 60, 28, 1, 2A, 4, 2, 28, 14.03.2019, 14.03.2019, 14.03.2019, 3, 28, 13.06.2019, 2A, 17.06.2019, 14, 399, 4, 28, 14.03.2019, 11, 5, 28, Rs.506,61,50,010/-, 504,21,26,280/-, 13, 2A, 2A, 01.06.2013, 6, 28, 2A, 2A, 2000, 2000, 362, 15, 2A, 8, 2A, 1.6.2013, 2A, 2A, 9, 28, 16, 2A, 2A, 36, 2A, 28, 28, 14, 28, 29, 8, two, 12, 28, 34, 300, 2A, 171, 28, 35, 36, 28, 267, 28 142(2A, 18, 28, 2A, 18, 28, 16, 20, 15, 19, 28, 682, 232, 125.40, 218.84, 24,17,69,927/-, 20, more than 1000, 279.25, 21, 28, 3,53,45,032/-, No.3, 682, 232, 28, 11.1, two, 23, 28, 12.12.2018, 142(2A, two, 28, 2A, 25, 28, 03.08.2018, 3, 1, 30.10.2018, 250, 26, 28, 142, 2A, 2D, 142, 3, 142, 4, 27, 28, 28

DATE: August, 2019 + W.P.(C, 9359/2019, 9359/2019, 9359/2019 1, 38599/2019 3, 06.08.2019, the assessment year 2016-17, 1961, 9359/2019, year 2016-17, the year, 30.05.2019, 06.06.2019, 9359/2019, 30.05.2019, 4 days, 2017, 9359/2019, 06.05.2019, a period of ninety days, 9359/2019, 9359/2019, 2013, 9359/2019, 9359/2019 Page 7 of 28, 2014, 9359/2019, 2013, 2013, 9359/2019, 2013, 9359/2019, 9359/2019, 2014, 9359/2019, 2008, 9359/2019 Page 13 of 28, 1988, 9359/2019, 2004, 2013, 9359/2019, 9359/2019 Page 17, 9359/2019, 30.05.2019, 12.06.2019, 17.06.2019, 28.06.2019, the year, the year, 9359/2019, 371,47,42,141/-, the year, the year, Each year, 9359/2019, the year, 9359/2019 Page 22, 9359/2019, each assessment year, 9359/2019, 1961, 21, 30.05.2019, 12.12.2018, 9359/2019, 30.05.2019, the assessment year, 9359/2019, 9359/2019, 2019, 9359/2019 Page 28

PERSON: RELIGARE FINVEST LIMITED, Ajay Vohra, Rohit Jain, Kavita Jha, VaibhavKulkarni, Raghvendra Singh, Vipul Agrawal, Ajay Vohra, Rohit Jain, Kavita Jha, Vaibhav Kulkarni, Raghvendra Singh, Vipul Agrawal, VIPIN SANGHI HON'BLE, SANJEEV NARULA W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Petitioner, Religare Finvest Limited, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Religare Finvest Limited, Ajay Vohra, W.P.(C, Vohra, W.P.(C, Anr, W.P.(C, Bill, W.P.(C, Vohra, Vohra, W.P.(C, Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri, S.R. Tendolkar, W.P.(C, Subramaniam, W.P.(C, Lucknow, W.P.(C, Cotton Mills, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Vohra, Vohra, W.P.(C, let‟s, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, 110 Crores, 432.92 Crores, Delhi Police, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Delhi Police, Delhi Police(EOW, g.i, j. Therefore, W.P.(C, Vohra W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Vohra, W.P.(C, W.P.(C

ORG: INCOME TAX & ANR, INCOME TAX & ANR, Income Tax, C.R. Building, I.P. Estate, CASS, Securities & Exchange Board of India, the Supreme Court, Court, Sahara India Financial Corporation Ltd., CIT, Religare Housing Development Finance Corporation, CIT, the Income Tax Department, Income Tax, M/s Das Gupta and, Associates, WP, RFL, Income Tax, Income Tax, M/s Das Gupta and, Associates, W.P., RFL, the Supreme Court, AO, assessment.14, Court, AT &T Communication Services India (P.) Ltd., Income Tax, Court, Assessing, AO, Assessing, Court, Sahara India Finance Corporation Ltd., CIT, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court, CBI, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, AO, Income Tax, Court, Court, Sahara India Supreme Court, Accountant, Swadeshi, Co. Ltd., C.I.T., Court, the Supreme Court to Section 142(2A, Assessing, the Calcutta High Court, Bank Ltd., Income Tax, Income Tax, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, AO, AO, the Supreme Court, Emphasis, Court, Sahara India Finance Corporation Ltd., the Competent Authority, AO, AO, Assessing, the Supreme Court, Court, Sahara India Finance Corporation, the Supreme Court, Court, AO, Court, AO, Court, AT &T Communication Services India (P.) Ltd., Court, Emphasis, Court, Finance Company, NBFC, Various Banks, Financial Institutions, Enforcement Directorate (ED, Serious Fraud Investigation, SFIO, EOW, NBFC, RBI, NBFC, SCN, Enforcement Directorate (ED, Special Fraud Investigation, SFIO, EOW, Religare Enterprise Limited W.P.(C, ReligareFinvest Limited, RHC Holdings, Assessing, EOW, Delhi Police, u/s 142(2A, Emphasis, The Assessing Officer, Muthoottu Mini Kuries, The Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Court

GPE: New Delhi, WP, No.9359/2019, theAssessee, Assessee, India, A.O., A.O., A.O., A.O., A.O., A.O., A.O., A.O., Assessee, 06.06.2019, Assessee, Assessee, Assessee, A.Y.

ORDINAL: third

PRODUCT: Respondent, Memorandum, 30/05/2019, Forensic

LOC: Sahara India, Sahara India, Sahara India, Sahara, Sahara, Sahara India, Sahara India, 31/03/2016

WORK_OF_ART: The Commissioner of Income Tax, 30/05/2019

QUANTITY: 9 bulky volumes

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //