M/S Ncr Developers vs.university of Delhi

Decided On : Apr-25-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11, Section 8, Section 8, the Arbitration Act,1940 Act, section 34, section 11, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Page 11, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11(6, Section In North Eastern Railway v. Tripple 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11, The Arbitration Agreement, the Arbitration Agreement, Section 11, Section 11, Section 12(5

MONEY: ~22

PERCENT: + %, 7 SCC684and

ORG: M/S NCR, UNIVERSITY OF DELHI, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the New Administrative Block,University of Delhi, Registrar, DU, Arbitration Clause, Court, Arbitration, Arbitration, Court, Court, the Appointing Authority, VC, Delhi University, the Delhi University, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, I. Nandyal Coop, Spinning Mills Ltd., Nav Nirman Construction Company v. Executive Engineer, Irrigation and Flood Control Department, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., M/s AnsalBuildwell Ltd., M/s Centre for Development of Telecom, Rites Ltd., North Eastern Railways, Tripple Engineering Works, Counsel for the Respondent, the Arbitration Clause, VC/Administrative VC, Delhi University, Arbitration, the Delhi University, Arbitration, Court, Court, I. Newton Engineering, Chemicals Ltd., Indian Oil Corporation Ltd. &Ors, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., M/s Narbheram Power and Steel Pvt. Ltd., Civil Appeal No.2268/2018, Mohan Aggarwal Construction Co., M/s AnsalBuildwell Ltd., M/s Centre for Development of Telecom, Rites Ltd., ACC Ltd., Global Cements Ltd., Union of India, Parmar Construction Company (Civil Appeal No.3303/2019, the Arbitration Clause, Arbitration Clause, Disputes & Arbitration CLAUSE25Except, V.C, the Delhi University, University, University, Delhi University, the Delhi University, Delhi University, the Administrative Head, the Delhi University, Contract, Arbitration, Contract, Delhi University, Delhi University, the Administrative Head, the Delhi University, the Arbitration Clause, Arbitration, the Arbitration Clause, Clause, Delhi University, Arbitration, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Nandyal Coop, Spinning Mills Ltd, Court, Arbitration Clause, Arbitrator(s, Contract, Court, Nav Nirman Construction Company Ltd.(supra, Newton Engineering, Chemical Ltd., ED, NR, NR, Corporation, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, ACC Ltd., Court, Court, Contract, Supreme, Datar Switchgears Ltd v., Tata Finance Ltd, Punj Lloyd Ltd., MHB Ltd., Court, Court, Supreme Court, Union of India, Parmar Construction Company, Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, Patel Engineering Company Limited, Union of India, Singh Builders Syndicate, The Supreme Court, Court, Union of India, Parmar Construction Company, the Arbitration Clause, Datar Switchgears Ltd., Lloyd Ltd., Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co. Ltd., Arbitration Clause, Arbitration, Court, Datar Switchgears Ltd., Union of India, Datar Switchgears Ltd., Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co., Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, GCC, Court, Court, this Court in Union of India v., Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Corporation Ltd., Tripple Engineering, Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Arbitration, the Bombay High Court, Agreement, Court, un, C-DOT, Arbitrator, the Arbitration Agreement, the C-DOT, the Supreme Court, Datar Switch Gear, Tata Finance Ltd., Arbitrator, the Bombay High Court, the C-DOT, C-DOT, Department of Telecom Services, Telecom Commission, Court, Court, Ansal Buildwell Limited, Court, Ess Ess Constructions v. Union of India, CPWD, Additional Director General, CPWD, Nandyal Coop, Spinning Mills Limited, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Mohan Aggarwal Construction Company, Bench, Nandyal Coop, Spinning Mills Ltd, the Supreme Court, Mohan Aggarwal Construction, Appellant, Clause, the Supreme Court, Union of India, Mohan Aggarwal Construction Co., Nandyal Coop, Spinning Mills Limited, Raja Transport Private Ltd.(supra, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., Court, clause.20, Court, Arbitration, Arbitration, Contract, Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act

PERSON: Nishit Kush, Mercy Hussain, Asma, Aakansha Kaul, J.:1, Broken RCC Chajjas, Nishit Kush, Mohan Rao, V. Raja Transport Private Ltd., Akansha Kaul, Punj Lloyd Ltd.(supra, Designate, Punj Lloyd, Designate, parties.44, Ansal Buildwell Limited, Nagpur, J.C.Seth, P.S. Saran, Retd, Bench, xxxxxx CLAUSE25It, Mohan Rao, K.V.Mohan Rao, Schedule VII

CARDINAL: 6, 2, 47,39,140/-, forty seven, 1, 62,75,716.19/-, 24,60,030/-, Twenty Four, 62,75,716.19/-, 2, 6, 2 SCC654II, 8, 3, 5, 6, 4, 4, 18 II, 7, 6, 5, 18, 1,00,000.00, 6, 18, 7, 18, 8, 18, 6, 6, 1, 9, 18, 6, 8 SCC151;Union, 2 SCC638, 10, 18, 10, 1, 18, one, one, 12, 18, 64(3)(a)(ii, 13, 18, 16, 14, 18, one, 67.1, 8), 26.8.2008, 15, 18, 17, 13, 2In, 16, 18, 19, 17, 18, 2015.22, 18, 18

DATE: 1996, 13th February 2015, 18 March 2016, 14th December 2016, 14th September 2018, a period of, 30 days, a period of, 30 days, 1993, 2009, 2009, Del 2966, 2013, 2nd May 2018, 2015, 22nd January 2015, 2009, Del 2966, 2012, 29th March 2019, 2000, 2007, 2006, 2008, 42, 30 days, 30 days, the year 1996, two decades, 1996, 2002, 2nd February, 2017, 23rd October, 2015, four weeks, today

PRODUCT: the 'Act', Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, VC, VC, VC, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

EVENT: 4th February 2015

LOC: Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, North Eastern Railway, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

FAC: the Sole Arbitrator, Satya Kailash

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, first

GPE: India, D.U., India, New Delhi, Punj, Satya