Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Steel Authority of India Ltd vs.m/s Seaspray Shipping Co Ltd

Decided On : Feb-28-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, the Additional Award, the Indian Broker, the Additional Award, the Illustrations to Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 202, Section 21, Page 15, Article 14 of the Constitution do, Section 34, the Contract Act, the Distributorship Agreement, the Distributorship Agreement, the Distributorship Agreement, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, the COA Agreement, the COA Agreement, Section 73

ORG: 76/2015 & I.A. No.13588/2017 Reserved, M/S SEASPRAY SHIPPING CO LTD, JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1, the Arbitral Award, Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, OMP762015 Page 1, the Arbitral Tribunal, I.A. No.13588/2017, the Contract of Affreightment, Charterer, COA, COA.7, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Contract, COA, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, COA, COA, Agreement, Arbitral Tribunal, COA, Agreement, COA, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Baltic Exchange Fixture, the Arbitral Tribunal, Contract, COA, the Arbitral Tribunal, COA, Agreement, COA, the Impugned Award, COA, the Arbitral Tribunal, COA, COA, Agreement, COA, Clauses 1 to 5, COA, Charterer, Arbitral Tribunal, COA, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, COA, Agreement, Statement of Defence, COA, The Arbitral Tribunal, period.18, UOI & Anr, Baltic Exchange, the Arbitral Tribunal, COA, COA, COA, COA, Charterer, COA, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Supreme Court, Paul Singh & Ors, Court, Zeman Techno Group, UOI, FAO, the Arbitral Tribunal, OMP762015 Page 8 Contract, Agreement, Clauses 3 and 4, Agreement, The Arbitral Tribunal, Impugned Award, Agreement, Shippers/Charterers, Chamber of commerce, Governmental Authority, Suppliers/Charterers, The Arbitral Tribunal, Additional Award (Reasons, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Contract of Affreightment, Claimant‟s, the Contact of Affreightment, E.C. this Contract of Affreightment, COA, MT, COA, Agreement, Agreement, Claimant, Claimant, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, Central Bank of India, Ltd, Amritsar, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., AIR1965SC1288 the Supreme Court, Insured, OMP762015 Page 13 Company, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Scheme, National Fertilizers, Central Bank of India Ltd.v, Hartford Fire Insurance Co. Ltd., this Court (Union of India, Court, inter alia, the Insurance Company, Court, AIR, para5, likes‟. Shortly, Court, Bakarwana Bazar, Court, the Insurance Company, Court, M/s Classic Motors Ltd., Maruti Udyog Ltd., the Supreme Court, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., Streamline Shipping Co. Pvt. Ltd., the High Court, Advocate General, State, Altus Group India Private Ltd., Darrameks Hotels & Developers Pvt. Ltd., MANU/DE/1362/2018, Court, Court, M/s. Darrameks Hotels & Developers Pvt. Ltd., M/s Altus Group India Pvt. Ltd, the Project Management and Consultant, the Supreme Court, Central Bank of India,, Limited, Amritsar, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., Limited, Delhi Development Authority, Nabha Power Limited, NPL, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, Classic Motors Limited, Maruti Udyog Limited, the Bombay High Court, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Limited v. Streamline Shipping Company Private Limited, Arbitrator, ITD Cementation India Limited, the Arbitral Tribunal, Courts, Court, Nabha Power Limited, the Supreme Court, Western Geco International Limited, Court, Pipavav Energy Pvt Ltd, Madhavi Procon Pvt. Ltd., Contract, Court, Court, Contract, Contract, the Supreme Court, Central Bank of India Ltd., the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, Contract, the Supreme Court in Competition Commission of, Fastway Transmission Private Limited and Others, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Steel Authority of India Ltd., J.C.Budharaja, Government and Mining Contractor, the Supreme Court, Eastern Engineering Enterprises & Anr, SCC283 the Supreme Court, Rashtriya Chemicals, Fertilizers Limited, Chowgule Brothers & Ors, SCC563 the Court, Arbitrators, District Central Cooperative Bank Ltd., United India Fire, General Insurance Company Ltd., the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, Charterer, Agreement, Shipbrokers, Reply, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, the 'Default Clause', SAIL, COA, Suppliers/Charterers, Default Clause, Emphasis, Agreement, the “Default Clause, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, the Government of India, M/s Sujora Shipping Pvt. Ltd., Contract, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Amritsar Gas Service & Ors, the Supreme Court, the appellant- Corporation, the Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Comau UK Limited v., Lotus Lightweight Structures Limited, the Queen‟s Bench Division, Comau, parties‟, Comau, Lotus, Comau, Lotus, Comau, Chitty on Contracts, Lotus, Lotus, Lotus, Comau, Comau, Agreement, Comau, Court, Coking Coal Ltd., State of, Rajasthan & Anr, Ferro Concrete Construction Pvt. Ltd., All India Radio v., Unibros & Anr, Kailash Nath Associates, DDA, The Arbitral Tribunal, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, The Delhi High Court, Saraya Distillery v. Union of India, The Hon'ble Court, Ismail Sait & Sons v. Wilson & Co., The Supreme Court, M/s, M/s Harishchandra Dwarkada, Contract, British Westinghouse Electric, Manufacturing Company Limited v., Explanation, Claimant, Claimant, Claimant, Bombay Container Terminals Pvt, /s. Johnson & Johnson Co. & Anr, Claimant, Claimant, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Baltic Exchange, Address Commission, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Baltic Exchange, Court, COA, COA, the Arbitral Award, Agreement, Shipment, the Impugned Award, the Supreme Court, Vedanta Ltd., Shenzen Shandong Nuclear Power Construction Co. Ltd, the London Inter Bank Offered Rate, the Supreme Court, Vedanta Ltd.

CARDINAL: 12.2018, 28, 02.2019, 71.5, 71.7, 10.06.2017, 71.5 to 71.7, 20.08.2014, 2,000,000, 10.06.2017, 13.09.2012, 13.09.2012, two, 27.07.2018, 1, 2, 5, 61, one, 27, 10, 01, 62, two, 62, at least 1,900,000, 62, 62, 148, 1,900,000, 2,100,000, 141, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, One, one, 1,2,3,4, 62, Claimant‟s, 62, one, 12, 61, 28, 7, 10, 10, 10, 30, 5, 49, 17, 17, 51, 17, 5, 10, 10, 10, 55, 15-16, 15, 10, 56, one, 31, 21, 70, 18, 85, 21, 32, 303, 5, 19.3, 19.3, 19.3, 33, 9, 20, 34, 9, 7, 5, 3, 12, 303, 9(IV, 9, 22, 12, four, 35, 24.11.2011, 21, 62, 4, 62, 8, 9, 25, 8, 5, 26, no.9, 61, 45, two, 62, 13.09.2012, 13.09.2012, 11.09.2012/10.09.2012, one, 1, 30, 12, 27, 1, 30, 1, 27, 27, 28, 27, 14, 27, 27, 31, 28, 1, 53, 20, 23, 12.5, 12.5, 1, 26, 074, one, 1, 12.5, 12.5, 12.5, 5, 12, 115, 4, 50, 50, 60,000, 59, 369:"The two, two, 10, 32/2011, 2, 39

PERSON: Sanjay Jain, Sunil K. Jain, Madhur Jain, Abhishek Jain, Anusha Agarwal, Yuvraj Sharma, Gaurav Mitra, Dhruv Kapur, Deepali Dwivedi, Aliff Fazelboy, Adit Singh, Award, Award, Coking Coal, Supplier, OMP762015 Page, Coking Coal, Award, Transchart, OMP762015 Page, Award, OMP762015 Page, Transchart, Paul Singh, Supplier, Supplier, Coking Coal, OMP762015 Page 11, Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v., Savjibhai Haribhai Patel, Nariman, Defendant no.1, Maddala Thathaiah, OMP762015 Page, rejected.71, Thakkar, OMP762015 Page, Maharani Shantidevi, Savjibhai Haribhai Patel, Reference, Award, Award, OMP762015 Page, OMP762015 Page, Award, Award, Award, OMP762015 Page, SAIL, SAIL, Suppliers, SAIL, SAIL, Shipment, Transchart, Transchart, OMP762015 Page, Allen, OMP762015 Page, Mr Allen, Award, LK Ahuja, xxxxxxx, xxxxxx, Supplied, Buyer, AC673, Kanpur, Kumar Khanna, OMP762015 Page, Award, OMP762015 Page, Award, Award

DATE: 1996, 22.02.2017, 30.09.2012, April, 2008 to, December, 2012, 11.09.2012, 01.12.2012 to the date of the Award, 22.02.2017, 11.09.2012, 14, 11.09.2012, 11.09.2012, the same day, 11.09.2012, 11.09.2012, the period of June, 2011 to September, 2012, only three months, 1872, 7 20, April, 2008, December 2012, March, 2013, 30 days, 90 days, 20 days, 10.06.2017, 4th December 2007, Respondent‟s, Respondent‟s, Respondent‟s, April 2008 to December 2012, up to three months, 138, Respondent‟s, 62, 62, 62, 2001, 54, 1290, 1292-93, August 7, 1947, 1996, 68, 90 days, 90 days, 2002, one year, 2018, Del 9335, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, thirty days, 2001, 2015, 2017, 1997, 2002, 2014, 2018, Del 13100, 23 23, 36, 2018, 1999, 1999, 2010, 11.09.2012, Respondent‟s, 62, 11th September, 2012, Respondent‟s, May 2011, September 2012, 62, Respondent‟s, 11th September, 2012, 11th September, 2012, 24th August, 2011, approximately three years, May 2011, 1872, 11.09.2012, 11.09.2012, 47, May, 2011, 11.09.2012, 11.09.2012, 11.09.2012, 1991, 30 days, Issue No.2, April 1, 1976, 28, 28, March 11, 1983, 27, 30 days', 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, March 11, 1983, 2014, 1971, 2004, 2009, 2010, 2015, 34 58, 1872, a year, the first of January, the first of January, a year, the first of January, 1872, 1053, 1912, 2004, 37 60, June, 2011, December, 2012, 2018, 2019

QUANTITY: 71.5 to 71.7, 71.5 to 71.7, 2,000,000 MT5

PRODUCT: Award, Award, Additional Award, Award, Additional Award, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, No.1, Award, Respondent, Respondent, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Page 35, Respondent, Calcutta, Respondent

PERCENT: 5%, 5%, 2.5%, 1.25 %, 6%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 5%, 2.5%, 1.25%, 6%

GPE: Queensland, Australia, India, p.a., Australia, India, A.T., Gujarat, Queensland, Australia, India, Australia, Queensland, Australia, India, Australia, Australia, Australia, Mumbai, Bombay, Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd., Amravati, days‟, Vishwanath, London, Kanpur, Kanpur, CS(OS, order.64

LOC: the East Coast, the Eastern Coast, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent, The Mihalis Angelos, Respondent, Respondent, Respondent

WORK_OF_ART: Default Clause, a Memorandum of Understanding, Supplier/Charterer, Transchart‟, Supplier/Charterer, Supplier/Charterer, a Memorandum of Understanding, a Memorandum of Understanding, Reasons for the Final Arbitration Award, Cargo/Quantity, The Insurance, SCC101 Associate Builders v., Suppliers/Charterers, Suppliers/Charterers, the Agreement

ORDINAL: first, first, first, 11th, first, third, first

FAC: the Coking Coal, the Impugned Award

NORP: ”These, Indian, Pipavav

EVENT: Clause 62, September 2012, the Additional Award

TIME: 36 second

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //