Cushman and Wakefield India Private Limited vs.union of India & Anr

Decided On : Jan-31-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 14, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution of India, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g, Article 301 of the Constitution of India, Section 247, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 247, the Companies Act, the Constitution of India, Page 5, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Section 247 of the Act, Chapter in the Act, Section 232-Compromises, the Companies Act, Page 10 of 18, Page 11, Page 12, Page 13, the Advocates Act, Article 19, Article 19, Article 19(1)(g, Page 15, Article 14, Article 19(1)(g, Article 14, Page 16, Page 17, Page 18

GPE: NEW DELHI, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, W.P.(C, W.P.(C

DATE: January, 2019, 9883/2018, 9889/2018, 9890/2018, 9927/2018, 9890/2018, 2017, 2017, 18, the years, 2013, October 18, 2017, 2017, 2016, 2013, 2013, 1956, 2016, 2013, 2016, 18 14, January 23, 2019, 18 18, 1996, 18 21, 1961, Paras 16, 20, 22, 22, 2016, 9883/2018, 9889/2018, 9890/2018

ORG: CM No.38508/2018 CUSHMAN AND WAKEFIELD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED Through, UNION OF INDIA & ANR Through, UOI, UNION OF INDIA, ANR, UOI, CM No.38524/2018 CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED, No.9883/2018, Page 1, UNION OF INDIA, ANR, UOI, CM No.38673/2018 JONES LANG LASALLE, UNION OF INDIA, ANR, UOI, No.9883/2018, Page 2, W.P., Court, the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, Court, the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, No.9883/2018, Page 4, the Companies (Registered Valuers and Valuation) Rules, the RV Rules, the Supreme Court, Cellular Operators Association of India, Telecom Regulatory Authority of India and Others, the RV Rules, Page 7, Parliament, No.9883/2018, IBC, FDI, No.9883/2018, Valuation Rules, No.9883/2018, Registered Valuers, No.9883/2018, the Supreme Court, Bar Council of Maharashtra & Goa, No.9883/2018, the Supreme Court, Swiss Ribbons Pvt. Ltd. & Anr, Union of India & Ors, Writ Petition (Civil, the Supreme Court, IBC, No.9883/2018, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the State Bar Council of Maharashtra and Goa, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Bar, the State Bar Councils, Page 14, State, the State Bar Council, the State Bar Council, the State Bar Council, Learned Senior Counsel, Cellular Operators Association of India and Others, No.9883/2018, CM No.38673/2018, No.9883/2018

PERSON: Vikas Singh, Karan Malhotra, Vikram Bajaj, Rahul Raj, Chandra Thampi, Kapil Seth, Madhavi Divan, Akshay Makhija, Nidhi Khanna, Aditya Goyal, CM No.38522/2018 KNIGHT FRANK, Vikas Singh, Karan Malhotra, Vikram Bajaj, Rahul Raj, Chandra Thampi, Kapil Seth, Madhavi Divan, Akshay Makhija, Nidhi Khanna, Aditya Goyal, Vikas Singh, Karan Malhotra, Vikram Bajaj, Rahul Raj, Chandra Thampi, Kapil Seth, W.P.(C, Madhavi Divan, Akshay Makhija, Nidhi Khanna, Aditya Goyal, Vikas Singh, Karan Malhotra, Vikram Bajaj, Rahul Raj, Chandra Thampi, Kapil Seth, Madhavi Divan, Akshay Makhija, Nidhi Khanna, Aditya Goyal, Sanjeev Sabharwal, Hem Kumar, Adv, JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO V. KAMESWAR RAO, J.(ORAL, W.P.(C, a. b. Issue, W.P.(C, Vikas Singh, W.P.(C, a Registered Valuer, a Registered Valuer, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Madhavi Divan, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Madhavi Divan, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, a Registered Valuer, Singh, W.P.(C, Haniraj L. Chulani, W.P.(C, Madhavi Divan, W.P.(C, Haniraj L. Chulani, W.P.(C, Rule, W.P.(C, Vikas Singh, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, V. KAMESWAR RAO, W.P.(C

CARDINAL: 18, four, 18, 3(2, 3, 3(2, 3(2, 2, 3, 4, 18, 18, two, 6, 18, 7, 1(3, 18, 2013.12, 8, 192(2)-, 59(3)(b)(ii)-, 3, three, at least one, 772, 2, 679, 93, 2, 3, 18, 16, 1)(g, 18, 6, two, 18, 22, 18, NCLT.23, 18, 18

ORDINAL: first, first

NORP: Indian, Indian, Rules, Rules

EVENT: SCC703 10

PRODUCT: Page 9, X X X W.P.(C