Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Ms Shikha Gupta vs.state (Gnct of Delhi)

Decided On : Jan-08-2019

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 306 Indian Penal Code, Section 106, Section 306 IPC, Section 107, Section 107 IPC, Section 107 IPC, Section 306 IPC, Section 107 IPC, Section 107, Section 107 IPC, Section 306 IPC, Section 306 IPC, Section 306, Section 107 IPC, Section 482, Section 306 IPC, Section 306 IPC, Section 306 IPC, Section 306

PRODUCT: F DE L, Orilal Jaiswal, Lordship

DATE: November, 2018, January, 2019 + CRL, 15.03.2017, 1860, 20.05.2015, 31.07.2015, 02.08.2015, 03.08.2015, 15.03.2017, 02.08.2015, ten years, 16 14, 2001, 1994, 2017, 2009, 2010, 2001, 1088, 2001, 1088, 2004, Praveen 39, 2012, 2013, 16 40, 2010, 2010, 2004, 2007, 2007, 2009, 2009, 2010, 2010, 2005, 2009, 2010, 2001, 1088, 2001, 1088, 3 days, 15.03.2017, 15.03.2017, 30.03.2017

PERSON: GUPTA, Lohit Ganguly, Hiren Sharma, Dev Kumar, SANJEEV SACHDEVA JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, Z. B, Kumar, Bench, Kumar Chopra v. State, Kumar Chopra v. State, Kumar v. State, Kumar v. State, Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh, Kishori Lal v. State of, Kishori Lal v. State of, Mangalgiri Goswami, Mangalgiri Goswami, Bench, Kumar Chopra v. State, Kumar v. State, Bench, R.C. Lahoti, Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh, Order Dasti, JANUARY08

ORG: State, CORAM:-"HON’BLE MR, CRL, the Trial Court, IPC for short).2, CRL, the Crime Against Women Cell, the Crime Against Women Cell, FIR, the Trial Court, CRL, Trial Court, Trial Court, Learned Counsel, IPC, CRL, Court of Justice, CRL, the Supreme Court, State of Chhattisgarh, the Supreme Court, State of W.B., Court, CRL, the Supreme Court, State, the Supreme Court, Section 306 IPC, IPC, IPC, CRL, CRL, Court, Uttaranchal, Pradhan, State of Uttaranchal, Pradhan, State, CRL, Court, Court, Section 306 IPC, Netai Dutta v. State of W.B., Netai Dutta v. State of W.B., CRL, Pranab Kumar Nag, Pranab Kumar Nag, Pranab Kumar Nag, CRL, Chitresh Kumar Chopra, CRL, the accused abetted commission, Court, CRL, CRL, The Trial Court, CRL, Court, CRL

CARDINAL: 1, 25.02.2015, 1, 16, 14.07.2015, 31.07.2015, 2, 16, 11, 3, 13, 4, 9, 1, 107, 5, 16, 16, 7 SCC780, 107, 6, 16, two, NCT, Chitresh, NCT, 16, 3, 367, 610, 13, three, 107, 15, 7, 16, 9, 9, 13, 8, 56, 134, 12, 9, 1, 146, 741, 18, 9, 1, 1, 13, 56, 10, 3, 701, 4, 2, 62, 1, 1, 712, 12, 41, two, 543, 10, 16, 661, 6, 6.7, two, 11, 16 two, 42, Chitresh, NCT, 16, 3, 367, 611, 16, three, 9, 19, 9, 12, 16, 611-12, 20, 13, 16, 17, 14, 16, 30.03.2017, 15, 16, 16

NORP: Hindu, home.3, Randhir, Amalendu, Amalendu

GPE: Gurgaon, Ramesh, Pawan, Chitresh, Delhi, Delhi, Ramesh, Kumar v. State of Chhattisgarh, Singh v. State of Punjab, Singh v. State of Punjab, para12, para18, Singh v. State of Punjab, Kishangiri, Gujarat, Kishangiri, Gujarat, para12, Delhi, Ramesh, Chhattisgarh, Ramesh

ORDINAL: First, Secondly, Thirdly, firstly, secondly, thirdly, Firstly, first

QUANTITY: 2 SCC659:2005

LOC: Single

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //