Ntpc Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd. Vs.precision Technik Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Dec-18-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, Article 4.6.1 of the PPA, Article 3.1 of the PPA, Article 2.1.1 of the PPA, Article 4.1 of the PPA, Article 1.1 and Article 3.1 of the PPA, Article 3.1 of the PPA, Article 11.3.1 of the PPA, Article 4.4.1 of the PPA, Article 2.1 of this Agreement, Article 11 of this Agreement, a Transmission Agreement, Article, Article 3.1, Article 3.1, Article 3.2, Article 3.1, Article 4.5, Article 3.3, Article 3.1, Article 15, Article 4.1, Article 4.5.2, Article 4.5.1, Article 13, Article 11, Article 4.5, the Scheduled Commissioning Date.20, Section 68, the Electricity Act, Article 3.1 of the PPA, Article 4.1 of the PPA, Section 68, the Electricity Act.21, Article 3.1 of the PPA, Article 3.1(a, Article 4.1.1, Article 4.1.1, Article 4.1.1(d, Section 68, the Electricity Act, Article 3.1(a, Section 68, the Electricity Act, Section 68, the Electricity Act, Article 3.1(a, Section 68, the Electricity Act, Article 3.1(a, Article 3.1(e, Article 11.3 of the PPA, Article 11.3.1, Article 11.4, Article 11.7, Article 11.3.1, Article 11.3.1, the Contract Act, Chapter III, Section 32, Section 56, the Contract Act, Section 56, Section 32, Section 56, Section 56 of the Contract Act, Section 32, the Contract Act, Section 56, Section 56, Section 56, Section 34, Article 4.4.1, Article 4.6.1 of the PPA, Article 4.6.1, Article 4.4.1.47

CARDINAL: 481/2016, 11.2018, 18, 12.2018, 1, 10.01.2011, 10.01.2011.4, 58, 21.02.2012, 58, 2, 08.02.2012, 08.02.2012, 21.02.2012, 21.02.2012, 26.09.2011, 5, 10, 3, 6, 1, 18, 1, 1.1, 7, 2.1, 8, 2, 9 3.5(B, 3.2, 3.2.1, at least seven, one, 3.3, 3.3.3, 3.4.1, three, 11, one, 4.4, 4.4.1, 9.198 Million, 5.256 Million, 4.5, 12, 4.6, one, more than one, more than two, 4.6.2, three, 13, 4.6.3, eighteen, 11.3, 11.3.1, 11.4, 19, 3.1, 4.1, 17, 07.07.2011, 15.7.2011 to, 26.09.2011, 18, 26.09.2011, 21.11.2011, 19, 10.10.2011, 27.10.2012, 20, 3.1, 4.1.1(a, 21, 2, 4, 14, 23, 36, 2 SCR793, 24, one, 2, three, 41, 2, 111, 26, 27, 12.3, 2, 28, 2, only one, 29, 12.4, 12.3, 12.7, 12.4, 37, 30, 31, 24, two, 33, 21.2.2012, 34

PERSON: Vikas Singh, Bharat Sangal, Isha Gupta, Babita Kushwah, Srishti Banerjee, Sandeep Sethi, Kavita Jha, Devika Jain, Jaisalmer, Shamji Kalidas, Petrochemicals, Award, the Term of this Agreement, Law, b. Delay, c. Delay, b. Delay, c. Non-performance, d. Strikes, xxxxxxx 11.7 Available Relief, Gazette, Supp, Khyaliram Jagannath, Khyaliram Jagannath, Noblee Thorl, Noblee Thorl GmbH, Tsavliris Russ, C.S. Wilson, Peter Dixon, KB p.784, Dunedin, Dr Singhvi, Award, Award, Award, Award, Award

EVENT: PRECISION TECHNIK PVT, the Grid Code, Contract Year, Contract Year, the Contract Year, Clause 12.7(a

ORG: JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA1, the Arbitral Award, Arbitral Tribunal, the Power Purchase Agreement, the Performance Bank Guarantee, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, Effective, the Contracted Capacity, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, Commissioning Date, the Commissioning Certificate, the Jodhpur Discom, the Arbitral Tribunal, Power Plant, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Commissioning Date, the Commissioning Date, the Review Committee, OMP, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Power Project, the Commissioning Date, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Review Committee, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tribunal, OMP, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Effective Date, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Financial Closure, Financial Closure, the Rajasthan Renewable Energy Corporation Ltd., RRECL, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, the Bank Guarantees, OMP, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Energy Department of the Government of Rajasthan, the Government of Rajasthan, The Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, the District Collector, the Supreme Court, Dhanrajmal Gobindram, the Appellate Tribunal for Electricity, Department Appeal No.123, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, Gujarat Electricity Regulatory Commission, Gujarat Energy Development Agency, Energy, Essar Power (Jharkhand) Limited, EPJL, Noida Power Company Limited, OMP, the Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, the Supreme Court, Sudarsan Trading Co. v. Government of Kerala & Anr, Steel Authority of India Ltd., Gupta Brother Steel Tubes Limited, DDA, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, the Supreme Court, M/s Hind Construction, Maharastra, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, OMP, the Bank Guarantee, the Bank Guarantee, the Supreme Court, M/s, Kailash Nath Associates, DDA & Anr, the Power Project, SPD, the Power Project, OMP, the Power Project, SPD, the Power Project, NVVN, OMP, the Effective Date, SPD, the Effective Date, Force, NVVN, Consents, Clearances and Permits, NVVN, Financial Closure, NVVN, Power Project, the Interconnection Facilities, STU, STU, SPD, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, SPD, JNNSM, NVVN, the Conditions Subsequent, NVVN, NVVN, Bank Guarantees, SPD, SPD, Force, the Conditions Subsequent, Force, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, Performance Bank Guarantee, OMP, Page 10, SPD, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, NVVN, the Performance Bank Guarantee, NVVN, Performance Bank Guarantee, NVVN, the Performance Bank Guarantee, the Commercial Operation Date, THE PROJECT4 CONSTRUCTION & 4.1 SPD‟s Obligations, Consents, Clearances and Permits, the Power Project, this Agreement and Prudent Utility Practices, the Contracted Capacity the Scheduled Commissioning Date, NVVN, OMP, Agreement, the Interconnection Facilities, the Power Project, Commercial Operation Date, Contracted Capacity & Energy, NVVN, SPD, SPD, MU, SPD, SPD shall, NVVN, NVVN, Discoms, SPD, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, OMP, NVVN, Default, NVVN, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, SPD, NVVN, SPD, NVVN, Event of Default, NVVN, Liquidated Damages, SPD, NVVN, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, NVVN, Liquidated Damages, Contracted Capacity, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, a. Delay, Performance Bank Guarantee, NVVN, Performance Bank Guarantee, NVVN, Performance Bank Guarantee, Power Project, NVVN, MW, NVVN, the Liquidated Damages, the Power Project, Performance Bank Guarantee, Liquidated Damages, the Power Project, Power Project, an Affected Party, the Affected Party, the Affected Party, Force, OMP, the Power Project, the Affected Party, the Affected Party, Force, NVVN Discom PSA, SPD, Discom, Exclusions 11.4.1, the Power Project, the Affected Party, the Affected Party's, OMP, Party, Party, Party, Force, the Effective Date, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, OMP, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Bank Guarantees, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, the Interconnection Facilities, the Interconnection Facilities, the Delivery Point, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, the Scheduled OMP, the Arbitral Tribunal, Panchayat, the Effective Date of the PPA, OMP, The Arbitral Tribunal, the Route Survey, RRECL, the Energy Department of the Government of Rajasthan, The Energy Department of the Government of Rajasthan, RRECL, RRECL, the Government of Rajasthan, the Arbitral Tribunal, OMP, the Arbitral Tribunal, RRECL, the Energy Department of the Government of Rajasthan, the Energy Department, The Arbitral Tribunal, RRECL, Nos.1993, RRECL, the District Collector Jaisalmer, RRECL, Arbitral Tribunal, Scheduled Commissioning, Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, OMP, the Interconnection Facilities, Delivery, Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, The Arbitral Tribunal, OMP, Tribunal, the Power Project on the Scheduled Commissioning Date, RRECL, the Energy Department of the Government of Rajasthan, the Arbitral Tribunal, P Kasilingam & Ors, P.S.G. College of Technology & Ors, Bharat Co-Operative Bank, Co-Operative Bank Employees Union, the „Prudent Utility Practices‟. OMP, the Prudent Utility Practices, RRECL, the Government of Rajasthan, Pasithea Infrastructure Ltd., Solar Energy Corporation of India & Anr, Court, RFS, Frustration/Force, the Government Departments, Energy Watchdog, Central Electricity Regulatory Commission & Ors, the Supreme Court, OMP, Satyabrata Ghose, Mugneeram Bangur & Co., Mugneeram Bangur & Co., Court, Alopi Parshad & Sons Ltd., Union of India, Parshad & Sons Ltd., Union of India, Court, OMP, Naihati Jute Mills Ltd., Naihati Jute Mills Ltd., Court, Satyabrata Ghose, Mugneeram Bangur & Co., Mugneeram Bangur & Co., Court, Tsakiroglou & Co. Ltd., Tsakiroglou & Co. Ltd., the House of Lords, Chitty on Contracts, 3rd Edn, Worldwide Salvage & Towage) Ltd., Lloyd's Rep 517, OMP, Adani, OMP, Clauses 12.3 and, Treitel, 3rd Edn., Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd., Co. Ltd., Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd., C.S. Wilson & Co. Ltd., Peter Dixon & Sons Ltd., Craig & Co. Ltd., Peter Dixon & Sons Ltd., Craig & Co. Ltd., the Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd., C.S. Wilson & Co. Ltd., the Court of Appeals, Peter Dixon & Sons Ltd., Craig & Co. Ltd., Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd., C.S. Wilson & Co. Ltd., Tennants (Lancashire) Ltd., C.S. Wilson & Co. Ltd., AC, OMP, Satyabrata Ghose, Mugneeram Bangur & Co., Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, Dhanrajmal Gobindram, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Gujarat Urja Vikas Nigam Limited, OMP, Essar Power, the Uttar Pradesh Electricity Regulatory Commission, Court, the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, the Performance Bank Guarantee, the Supreme Court, Kailash Nath Associates, OMP, Discoms, NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd., Saisudhir Energy Ltd., MANU/DE/1718/2018, NVVN, Arbitrators, PPA, SEL, Clause 4.6, OMP, Arbitrators, SEL, NVVN, Solar Power Developer, the Scheduled Commissioning Date, Sai Sudhir Energy Ltd., Court, OMP, the Performance Bank Guarantee, the Arbitral Tribunal, the Bank Guarantee, the Performance Bank, RN OMP

DATE: 1996, 180 days, 43 days, 180 days, 180 days, 4 12, 2012, 2012, 2013, 2009, 2015, 1979, 2015, 09th January, 2012, 180 days, 15 days, the 180 days period, 7) days, the 7th day, 3) months, 1) year, less than „day, 1) month - NVVN, 1) month, two months, three months, 3) months, a week, week, 18) months, eighteen, 18) months, 2003, 180 days, 180 days, 19.10.2011, 20 days, 05.11.2011, 20.12.2011, 90 days, 25 days, another 4 days, 1994, 21 days, 25.05.2011, 11.11.2011, 1995, 2007, 22 34, 2017, Del 12562, 36, 2017, 1872, 1954, 37, 1960, 1968, 1954, 1962, 1961, 1961, 2007, 2007, 42, Clause 12.7(a, Clause 12.7(a, Clause 12.7(a, 1917, 1919, the beginning of the First World War, 1917, 1919, 1917, 47, 1954, tariff.44, 25 years, 46, a contract year, 2018

ORDINAL: first, second, First

WORK_OF_ART: Scheduled Commissioning, faulted.10, Consents, Clearances and Permits, Effective Date, Scheduled Commissioning Date, Electricity Act‟, Frustration and Force, 45., Frustration and Force

NORP: Patwari, NVVN46.1, Indian, affairs.23, Patwari, Patwari, Patwari, British, British, Scandinavian, SEL, SEL, SEL

GPE: New Delhi, IA, Discoms, Discoms, Rs.1,00,000/-, India, India, India, Hamburg, Port Sudan, England, Indonesia, Clause, Clause, Clause, Henderson, Henderson, Henderson, Rs.1,82,13,000/-, Rs.1,82,13,000/-, Rs.1,82,13,000/-

QUANTITY: 3 ARTICLE3

FAC: the Delivery Point, Notice, the Delivery Point, the Impugned Award, the Delivery Point, Route Survey.25, the Suez Canal, the Suez Canal

PRODUCT: Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Para 14-151, Treitel, Para 12-034, Para 14-151, Para 15-158, Agreement

PERCENT: 25%, 20%, another 40%, 10%, 25%, 10%

LANGUAGE: English, English, English

LOC: the Cape of OMP, Sea Angel, The Sea Angel