Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Parveen Garg vs.satpal Singh & Anr.

Decided On : May-11-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Compromise Agreement, the Compromise Agreement, the Compromise Agreement, Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 20, Section 20 of Specific Relief Act, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 106, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 16(c, Section 114, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 16, Section 16(c, Section 16(c, Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Provisos to Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act, Section 20, Section 20, Section 20(3, Section 20, Section 73, the Contract Act, Section 73, the Contract Act, the Specific Relief Act, Section 20, Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 73, the Indian Contract Act

PERCENT: + %, 12%, approximately 50%, around only 12%, 5 Delhi, 50%, 5%, 10%, as 50%, about 10%, 10%, 90%, 90%, only around 17%, 17%, 10%, approximately 14.5%, just 12%

DATE: May, 2018, May, 2018, 1908, 1.9.2003, 27 3, 1.9.2003, the next day, April, 2004, 9.4.2004, 1.9.2003, 24.11.2004, 27.04.2009, 27 10, 24.11.2004, 24.11.2004, 1.9.2003 and 24.11.2004, 27 April, 2004, April, 2004, 1-9-2003, the month of April 2004, 01.11.2003, the year April(cid:173)2004, 24.11.2004, 1963, 01.09.2004, 24.11.2004, 16.12.2004, 27.1.2018, 22.5.1995, February, 2005, May, 1995, May, 1995, May, 1995, August, 2010, the year 1995, August, 2010, 23.5.1995, August, 2010, one day, 22.5.1995, February, 2005, 2012, 27.8.1988, February, 2005, August, 2010, 27, 1872, 2012, 26.9.1988, 1963, 27 14, 2011, 1963, Paras 37, these days, three months or, four months, two to three decades, a quarter century later, three years, 1 or 2 years, three-year, today, 1872, 1872, 1963, 1963, a much later date, 1963, 1988, 27 21, 2012, 2012, 2013, many many years earlier, the year 1995, today, the year 2018, today, the year 1995, today, the year 1995, around April/May, 1995, 10.2.1995, around May, 1995, the year 1995 to 2018, the year 1995, 1995, the year 2018, 2018

PERSON: Tamali Wad, Annu versus Bagai, Vijay Laxami Mewara, C.M. Appl, C.M. Appl, No.18621/2018, Receipt-cum-Agreement, Ram Karan Gupta, M. K. Mondal, HC Jitender, DW(cid:173)3, Vijay Kohili, R.K. Gupta, Singh, Charanjeet Kaur, Singh, Singh, Singh, Charanjeet Kaur, Draft, Singh, Charanjeet Kaur, Vijay Kohli, Ravi Singh, Sansad Marg Branch, Balance Sheets, Balance Sheets, ’s Managing, Arun Kumar Jain, Balraj Taneja, Anr, Iris Paintal, S. Rajalakshmi, Laxmi Devi, Singh, Kumar Jain, Meharban Singh, A.K. Narula Vs, Iqbal Ahmed, Delhi 315., Maharani Bagh, No.7, no.1, MAY11

ORG: SATPAL SINGH & ANR, C.M., RFA No.383/2018, This Regular First Appeal under Section 96, CPC, the Trial Court, Sunder Vihar, Paschim Vihar, the Police Station, Compromise Agreement, no.2, Sunder Vihar, Paschim Vihar, OPP, OPP, OPP, PLAINTIFF, State Bank of Bikaner & Jaipur, PW(cid:173)4, No.1941(cid:173)80/HAR/W, DEFENDANTS, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.1, no.2, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.1, no.1, no.1, no.2, no.2, no.2, no.1, no.2, April(cid:173)2004, November(cid:173)2004, April(cid:173)2004, Hon'ble High Court, Court, the Supreme Court, M/s Hotz Industries Pvt, L.Rs) & Ors, the A.B.N. Amro Bank, Rs.30, Court, Court, Court, 22.5.1995, Court, Baldev Behl & Ors, Bhule & Ors, Readiness, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, purchaser, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Jinesh Kumar Jain Vs, ILR, performance:-"(a, The Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx, Courts, Court, the Supreme Court, Courts, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Baldev Behl & Ors, Bhule & Ors, Jinesh Kumar Jain, Court, Court, Jinesh Kumar Jain, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, no.1, M/s Hotz Industries Pvt. Ltd.

CARDINAL: 1, 2.(i, 1, 27, 27.1.2018, 2, 2.9.2003, 3, 27, 10.4.2004, 9.11.2004, 24.11.2004, 4, 27, 9.12.2004, 5, 24.11.2001, 24.11.2004, 6.12.2004, 6.12.2004, 6.12.2004, 6, 27, 6 to 12, 24.11.2004, No.2, 4, 3, 8, 10.04.2004, No.2, 01.12.2004 to 31.03.2005, 7, one, 6.(i, two, 8, 24.11.2004, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, No.2, 1.9.2003, 9, 27, 24.11.2004, 24.11.2004, No.2, No.2, 24.11.2004, No.2, 10, 27, No.2, 4, 8, 11, 27, 7, No.2, 4, No.2, 12, 27, No.2, No.2, 8, 5000/(cid:173, No.2, 7,95,000/(cid:173, No.2, No.2, one, No.2, No.2, 8, No.2, 13, 27 9, No.2, 24.11.2004, No.2, 14, 27, 4, 10, 15, 27, 28.2.2018, 17 to 23, 16, 27, two, 9.2.2005, 9.2.2005, 17, 27, No.4, 1 to 3, No.4, 1 to 3, 132, 26, under:-""26(i, 30, 18, 27, 19.5, 12, No.3, 8.4.1988, 12, No.3, 8.4.1988, 18, 1 to 3, 19, 20, 678, 13, 18, 1, 2, 3, 4, 21, 12, 43, 37, 22, 27, one, ten thousand, ninety thousand, 43, 16, 44,00,000/-, 23, 27, 17, 1.5.2012, one, two, 5,60,000/-, 1, 18, at least between 30 to 50, 24, 131, 132, 25, 22.(i, one, at least around 20, 25, 27, 26, 27 23, 1 to 3, 11, 27, 27

GPE: New Delhi, Rs.1,00,000/-, New Delhi, CS(OS, New Delhi, no.4, no.4, Proviso, performance.15, Saradamani Kandappan, Saradamani Kandappan, K.S. Vidyanandam, Saradamani Kandappan, Jinesh, RFA(OS, Delhi, Delhi

QUANTITY: 133 sq. yards

PRODUCT: no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1 & 2, Rs.4,00,000/-, no.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, No.1, Para 11, No.5, AK VALMIKI J.MEHTA

WORK_OF_ART: Jinesh Kumar Jain, Jinesh Kumar Jain

ORDINAL: first, second, first, first

MONEY: DRJ247

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //