Altus Group India Private Limited vs.darrameks Hotels & Developers Private Limited

Decided On : Apr-20-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, Section 34 of the Act, Section 202, Section 21, the ULC Act, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, the American Law, Constitution, Article 14 of OMP(COMM), Section 34 of the Act, the Impugned Award, the Impugned Award

DATE: March, 2018, 1996, 30 days, 30 days, 30) days, 23.12.2011, No.2 4, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30 days, 30) days, 30 days, 2001, 49, 1987, 1928, 90 days, 70, 71, 90 days, 2002, one year, 2015, thirty days, about 7 months, Eighteen Lac, 22, 2018

CARDINAL: 499/2016, 1, 14.02.2011, 499/2016, 9, Thirty, 499/2016, two, two, 499/2016, 9(1, 9(II, 9(II, 9(IV, 9(II, 5.6, 499/2016, No.4, 8, 9(IV, 7, 10, 10, 10, 11, 5, 17, 17, 51, 499/2016, 17, one, 12, 65(1997, 59, 601, 61, 62, 1973(1, two, 63, 1955(2, 499/2016, 64, 1, 1978(3, 66, 68, 21, 499/2016, 85, 13, 303, 5, 19.3, 14, 3, 9(II, 9(IV, 2017(12, 16, two, 9(II, 2, 3, eighteen, 21, 12.04.2012, 499/2016, 2, 3

ORG: ALTUS GROUP INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, DARRAMEKS HOTELS & DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED, JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA NAVIN CHAWLA, the Arbitral Award, the “Professional Service Agreement, Owner, The Project Management Consultant, Owner, Owner, the Project Management Consultant, Owner, Owner, PMC, Services, Clause 9(II, the Project Management Consultant, PMC, PMC, Court, Clauses 9(II, Central Bank of India, Ltd, Amritsar, Hartford Fire Insurance Co., Ltd., AIR1965SC1288 the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Scheme, Court, the Insurance Company, Court, Classic Motors Ltd.v, Maruti Udyog Ltd., State Legislations in America, British Leyland Ltd., State Legislation, Hill Oils & Sales Ltd., Gillespie Brothers Ltd., Bench, Page No.8 Co., Credition Gas Company, Staffordshire Area Health Authority Vs, the Court of Appeal, Hospital, xxxxx Interpretation, the Supreme Court, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd., M/s Streamline Shipping, the High Court, Advocate General, State, Delhi Development Authority, the Supreme Court, Contract, Contract, Nabha Power Limited, NPL, Punjab State Power Corporation Limited, the Supreme Court, Court, Rs,18,00,000/- (Rupees, upheld.23, the Impugned Award

PERSON: Gopal Jain, Savita Sarna, Chinmayee Chandra, Manila Munjal, Saurabh Banerjee, Bikranu Singh, Award, Shantidevi P. Gaikwad v., Savjibhai Haribhai Patel, Nariman, Defendant no.1, Xxxxx 56, Gary H.Sharman Vs, Buckley, Martin Baker, Llanelly Railway, Doc, Llanelly, Thakkar, Award, Claim, Award, 18,00,000

PRODUCT: Sole Arbitrator, Agreement, Agreement, Clause 9 (II, No.1

PERCENT: 12%, 10%

FAC: the Impugned Award, Clauses, the Impugned Award: Analysis &

ORDINAL: first, first

GPE: malafide.10, India, United States, India, United States, India, U.S.A, Bombay

NORP: ”These, Canadian, American

WORK_OF_ART: LRC468