Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

The Polo/Lauren Company L P vs.m/s Varsha & Co and Anr

Decided On : Mar-23-2018

Court : Delhi

CARDINAL: 6, 1, 2, 1, 8, 2, 2, 8, 2, One Thousand, 2, 3, 2, 3 and 4, 3, 2018.4, 4, 8, 6, 5, 8, No.2, 6, 7, 8, 8, 8

ORG: THE POLO/LAUREN COMPANY L P ....., M/S VARSHA & CO AND ANR Through, Plaintiff, Court, CS, POLO, Mark/Label/Domain Names, POLO, POLO, POLO, POLO PLAYER, POLO, POLO, POLO, POLO PLAYER, POLO, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, the Trade Marks Act, Trade Mark/Label, Defendant No.3, Department of India, Telecommunications, Government of Defendant No.4 (Department of Electronics & Information Technology, the Web Pages, Schedule, Defendant No.3, Department of India, Telecommunications, Government of Defendant No.4 (Department of Electronics & Information Technology, Plaintiff, Court, POLO, POLO, Court, Satya Infrastructure Ltd. &Ors, Satya Infra & Estates Pvt. Ltd., CS, CPC, POLO, POLO, POLO PLAYER, POLO PLAYER, Classes of the Trade Marks Act, CS, POLO, POLO PLAYER, POLO, POLO, POLO PLAYER, POLO, POLO PLAYER, Court, CS, KA, MANMOHAN

PERSON: Ajay Amitabh Suman, Pankaj Kumar, Kapil Kumar Giri, Vinay Kumar Shukla, Defendants Ex-Parte Date, MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, Trade Mark/Label/Domain Names, Trade Mark/Label, Trade Mark/Label, Nos

DATE: March, 2018, 1999, 28th September, 2015, 28th September, 2015, 21st March, 2018, 21st March, 2013, 1967, 1999, the year 2015, quarterly, July, 2015, 16th July, 2015, 2018

FAC: Para No.7

GPE: the Memo of Parties, plaint.5, India

PRODUCT: 1 & 2, 1 & 2, No.1

WORK_OF_ART: The Polo/Lauren Company L.P.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //