Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Dinkar Mukul vs.union of India & Ors

Decided On : Feb-21-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: section 164(2, the Companies Act

MONEY: ~28,32,33,34, 1667/2018 & CM APPL

DATE: 2.2018 28 + W.P.(C, 6831-6833/2018, 6843-6845/2018, 6846-6848/2018, 1668/2018, 6849-6851/2018, the financial years 2012-2014, 2013, 1661/2018, 2018, 21.12.2017, 10901/2017, 2018

PERSON: Jasmeet Singh, Naman Jain, Joshi, Hemant, Vinod Diwakar, Jasmeet Singh, Naman Jain, Joshi, Hemant, Vinod Diwakar, Jasmeet Singh, Naman Jain, Joshi, Hemant, Vinod Diwakar, Jasmeet Singh, Naman Jain, Joshi, Hemant, Vinod Diwakar, RAJIV SHAKDHER RAJIV SHAKDHER, Vinod Diwakar, Jasmeet Singh, WP(C, RAJIV SHAKDHER

ORG: UNION OF INDIA & ORS, UNION OF INDIA & ORS, W.P., RITESH, UNION OF INDIA & ORS, UNION OF INDIA & ORS, W.P., the Register of Companies.3, the Board of company, Dictum Infotech Pvt. Ltd., Dictum Infotech Pvt. Ltd., Dictum Infotech Pvt. Ltd., the Register of Companies.6, W.P., Dictum Infotech Pvt. Ltd., UOI & Ors.9, the Division Bench, Lalit Tanwar & Anr, Union of India & Anr, view.10, W.P.

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2, 2, 4 2, four, 2, 2, 3, 4, 4

WORK_OF_ART: VERMA

PRODUCT: No.1, Respondent No.1, No.1

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //