Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Suresh Kumar vs.state of Delhi

Decided On : Feb-19-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 302 IPC, Page 1 of 25, Section 302 IPC, Page 5, Section 302 IPC, Section 313 Cr PC, Section 302, Page 11, Section 313 Cr PC, the Evidence Act 30, Section 106, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 304, Section 313 Cr PC, Section 25, Exception 1 to Section 300, Exception 1 to Section 300 Indian Penal Code, Exception 1 to S. 300, the Penal Code, Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, Section 302 IPC

CARDINAL: 182/2002, 2, two, 4, 11, one, 2, 25, 6, 2, 3, 3, one, No.7, 6, 4, 25, 7, No.4, 8, about 100, 9, 25, about 12 to, 17, 12, 6, one, 7, 2, As many as ten, 7, 25, 2, 8, 25, 7, two, 9, 25, more than half-a-century, 26, 3, 19, 10, 25, half, 23, 25, two, three, 12, 25, 8, 28, 29, 13, 10, 14, 25, 201, 33, 15, 25, 1.—When, 16, 38, 11, 619, one, 17, 1914, 3, 40, 2015)1, 18, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 41, 468, 42, 113, 19, 25, 43, 1, 153, 2, 178, 113, 45, 20, 25, 2, 21, 25, two, 22, 25, four, 23, 25, as many as 10, two, 24, 25, 51, 25, 25

DATE: February 05, 2018, February 19, 2018, 28th February 2002, 1999, one year, September 1998, daily, September 1998, between 2nd and, between 2nd and 3rd, between 2nd and 3rd, 13th October 2000, 11, 28th February 2002, 25, November 2017, 7 14, 2008, 2007, 1996, 2010, 1872, 1992, 25 36, 1163, 25 39, 1942, 1989, 1991, 44, 1995, 1988, 1984, 1969, 47, 49

PERSON: Saahila Lamba, Rajeev Gaur Naseem, S.MURALIDHAR, Kusum Dhalla, I. S. MEHTA, S. Muralidhar, J.:1, Moti Nagar, Mamta, Head Constable, Moti Nagar, Moti Nagar, Azad Singh, Mukesh Kumar, Raj Kumar, Moti Nagar, Moti Nagar, Moti Nagar, Appellant, Crl, M.L. Sharma, Sarvesh Tandon, IPW25 x 0.2 cm size, IPW2cm x 0.4 cm size, IPW2cm x 0.4 cm, edge.‖, Crl, Injury No.10, PWs 2, DD21, Saahila Lamba, Rajeev Gaur, Kusum Dhalla, PWs 2, PS Moti Nagar, Moti Nagar, Crl, SCC625, Complainant, Crl, Venkatarama Ayyar, A.S. Anand, Bindra, Lamba, Appellant, Rajeev Gaur, Crl, Maroti Kirkan, K. M. Nanavati v. State, ―In Mancini v. Director, Viscount Simon, Rex, Sankarayee, Crl, Chinnan @, M.W.N., Cr, Rafik Yakubbhai Shaikhv, Balasaheb Ramrao Latkar v. State, Lordships, Balasaheb Ramrao Latkar, S. MURALIDHAR, J.I. S. MEHTA

ORG: Amicus Curiae, APP, Additional Sessions, Police Station (‗P.S.‘, House, Sub Inspector, SI, SI, PW-2, PW-7, PW-7, the DDU Hospital, DDU Hospital, the ESI Hospital, PW-2, PW-7, PW-2, PW-7, PW-2, PW-7, PW-2, PW-2, The Station House, PS Moti Nagar, PW-2, ML, cms, cms, No.12.12, CFSL, Court, ASJ, PW-7, PW-7, Appellant, PW-2, PW-7, PW-2, PW-2, PW-9, PW-9, Court, Crl, Amicus Curiae, Court, State, APP, PW-2, PW-7, Reliance, Shekhar, PS, PW-7, Court, PW-7, PW-7, House, PW-7, PW-7, PW-2, Court, PW-7, Girja Prasad, Police Force, Court, Saurashtra, the Forensic Sciences Laboratory, Shekhar, Appellant, Court, Appellant, PW-9, Appellant, PS, Reliance, State of Andhra Pradesh, Court, Appellant, Court, Shaikh, SCC430the Supreme Court, Court, IEA, State of, Maharashtra (2006, the Supreme Court, Reliance, Changdeo, Court, Exception 1 to Section 300, Court, Court, Court, IEA, Court, Exception 1 to Section 300, Exception 1 to Section 300, IPC, Exception 1., Halsbury‘s Laws of England, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, A.C. 1, the Court of Criminal Appeal, the Supreme Court, Exception 1 to Section 300, Sankaral, Courts, Exception 1 to Section 300, Section Ex, Crl, Exception 1 to Section 300, The Gujarat High Court, K.M. Nanavati, murder.46, The Bombay High Court, Court, the Privy Council, Phillips, Bar, the Privy Council, The Privy Council, Lordships, IPC, Court, Crl, Court, Court, Exception 1 to Section 300, IPC, Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, Appellant, Exception 1 to Section 300 IPC, Court, Court, SHO, PS, Court

GPE: Delhi, P.S., Hem Chand, DD, DD, DD, DD, Delhi, DD, DD, DD, Tahir v. State, Delhi, Delhi, Trimukh, Rohtak, L.C., B.D., Guruswami, Gujarat

PRODUCT: Appellant, Rs.2,000/-, PW-13 and PW-14, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, SCC338, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, AC130, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

TIME: around 11:30 p.m., around 11:25 p.m., the intervening night, 3 pm, 2 pm, the evening

ORDINAL: 14th, 3rd, 7th, 8th, 7th, 8th, second, first, 30th, first, Secondly, first, First, Secondly, Thirdly, first, Secondly

QUANTITY: 7 cm, 10 cm below, 15 cm, 0.5 cm, 4 cm, 9 cm below, only 3 cm, 4 cm, 0.8 cm, 11 cm Below, 0.4 cm, 3 cm, 0.4 cm, 6 cm, 4 cm, 12cm, 1 cm, 1 cm, 3 cm, 7 cm, 3-5 cm, 10 cm, 11 cm, 14 cm

NORP: no.8, PW-2, PW-2, PW-2, PW-2, PW-2, PW-2, addressee, addressee

FAC: Appellant, Gottipulla Venkata Siva Subbrayanam, Krishna Chandra Pati v. Emperor

WORK_OF_ART: Appellant

EVENT: L.W. (Crl.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //