Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Parsoli Motors Works Private Limited vs.bmw India Private Litmited

Decided On : Jan-15-2018

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 9, Section 9, the Commencement Date, the Companies Act, the Dealer Agreement, the Dealer Agreement, the Dealer Agreement, the Dealer Agreement, Section 9, Section 115, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 94, Section 9, Section 14, Section 41, Section 9, Section 9, the Indian Evidence Act, Article 54 of the Limitation Act, Section 16, Section 9 of the 1996 Act, section 36, Section 9, Rule 37, Section 9, Rule 37, Section 14, Section 9 of the 1996 Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9 of the 1996 Act, Rule 37, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, SCC798 27, Section 9, Section 9, Section 9, the Arbitration Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 41, Section 9, Section 9, Section 41, Section 9, Section 9, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, the Distributorship Agreement, Section 34, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 30, the Arbitration Act, Section 14(1, Section 14(1, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 20, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 20, the Arbitration Act 1940, Section 41, Section 20 of the 1940 Act, Section 30, Section 9, Section 14(1)(c, Section 41, Section 16(c, Section 41(e, Section 41, Section 41, Section 14, Section 42, Section 14, Section 14, Section 9(ii)(e, Section 14(i)(c, Section 41, Section 9, Section 41(e, Section 9(ii)(e, Section 14(i)(c, Section 41, Section 9, Section 41, Section 14, Section 14, Section 41, the Special Relief Act, Section 9, Section 9, Section 41, Section 14 of the Specific Relief Act, Section 41, Section 41, Section 41, Section 14, Section 41

DATE: December, 2017, January, 2018 +, the 31st of December 2017, 1996, 29th December 2017, the next day, December 2017, 2nd January 2018, an end on, 31st December 2017, May 2008, 75, 05th January 2009, 1st January 2009, less than one month, later than 1st, December, 2009, January 2009, one year, one year, each year, one year, from year, 2008, 2017, Para 7, year to year, 14th January 2015, 14th January 2015, 5th January 2009, 1956, 14(FOURTEEN) days, 15 days, 15 days, 1996, one year, January 2015, 31st December 2015, 01st January 2015 to 31st January 2015, an end on, 31st December 2015, 01st December 2015, 14th December 2015, January 2016, 31st December 2016, 14th January 2015, December 2015, the period 01st, January 2017, 31st December 2017, 09th January 2017, 124 4566600, 4566602, January 9th 2017, January 14th, 2015, one year, 1st January, 2017, 31stDecember, 2017, January 14th, 2015, the period of 1st January, 2017, 31st December 2017, earlier years, the years 2016 and 2017, the years 2016, Para 13, the latter half of 2016, July 2017, 07th December 2017, January 2017, 124456600 + 91, 4566602, 07 December, 2017, 9th January 2017, one year, 1stJanuary 2017, 31stDecember, 2017, 31st December, 2017, 07th December 2017, a period of, nine years, each year, about three weeks, 14th January 2015, 09th January 2017, 1996, 1872, 2004, nine years, 2009, 21 days, ten years, The year to year, Para 28, 1995, 07th December 2017, 11.1, 07th December 2017, 2016, 2017, 1986, every year, 2010, 2014, 9 to 10 months, 1995, 4490/1995, November 1995, 03rd February 1995, 13th December 1996, 65 (1997, one year, 14th January 2015, 5th January 2009, 2017, 14th January 2015, the end of one year, 14th January 2015, 14th January 2015, 31st December 2017, 1963, 2003, 31st December 2017, 75, day one, the years 2016 and 2017, 1872, 1963, 21stAugust, 2015, 9 to 10 months, 1996, 2007, 14th May 2003, 10 years, May 2003, Just six months, November 2003, 1960, 18th August, 2004, November 2003, 1960, Para 11, 1993, 1993, 1993, ―It, a period of, 10 years, 1960, 2007, 2004, 2004, 2007, 1996, 2008, 1963, 75 32, 2009, 1):34, 29th November 1994, that day, the next date, November 1994, 31st August 1994issued, 35, 03rd November 1995, 03rd February 1995, 03rd February 1995, 03rd November 1995, 03rd February 1995, 36, 1940, 19th October 1983, 28th July 1984, November, 1984, 1st April 1976, 30 days, March 1983, 75 40, 16th December 1985, 1940, 1940, 10 of 1940, 30 days, 1985, 1986, 9th January 1988, 20th January 1988, 6th April 1991, 18th November 1991.48, 18th November 1991, 18th August 1994, 18th November 1991, 31st August 1994, 90 days, September 1994, 29th November 1994.50, September 1994, 15796/1994, September 1994, September 1994, 2005/1994, 22nd November 1994, 2005/1994, 75 52, 3rd February 1995, 31st August 1994, 4490/1995, 3rd February 1995, 4490/1995, November 1995, 55, 2007, 22nd July 1994, October 1994, 9 years, 3 years, 19th January 1999, 19th of January 1999, 1963, 75 16, 58, August 1984, 6 months, 8thMay, 1987, June 1987, 1996, 2007, 10 years, 23rd August 2015, 10 years, 5 years, four years, 08th August 2005, four years, 75, five years, 10th June 2015, 13th October 2011, five more years w.e.f 9th, August 2015, 12th June 2015, 12th June 2015, five years w.e.f 9th August 2015, 10th June 2015, 75 62, August 2015, 10th June 2015, 12th June 2015, 75 earlier, five years, 64, 9 to 10 months, 17th December 2017, 1996, 2017, 70, the current day, 1977, 71, 14th January 2015, 1st January 2015, 31st December 2015, 31st December 2015, no later than one month, no later than 30th November 2015, 14th January 2015, December 2015, one year, 01st January 2015, 31st December 2015, 14th January 2015, 14th January 2015, December 2015, 14th December 2015, 1st December 2015, December 2015

ORG: PARSOLI MOTORS WORKS PRIVATE LIMITED, BMW INDIA PRIVATE LITMITED, JUSTICE, SHANKAR, Bayerische Motoren Werke, ―Bavarian Motor, OMP, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, BMW, OMP, BMW, BMW, OMP, BMW, Emphasis, BMW, Dealer, Contract Goods, Territory, Dealer, BMW, Territory, Contract Goods, Dealer, Territory, Commencement and Duration AGREEMENT, Dealer, BMW, Connected Undertaking, BMW, Connected Undertakings, BMW, OMP, BMW, Dealer, Clause12, BMW, BMW, BMW Agreement, BMW, Contract Goods, BMW, OMP, BMW, Dealer, Connected Undertaking, Dealer, BMW, the Dealer‘s property OMP, BMW, Dealer, BMW, Dealer, OMP, BMW, Party, Arbitration, the Indian Arbitration Council, Arbitration, the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the Eighth Schedule, OMP, Agreement, the New Dealer Agreement, OMP, Motor Works Pvt, Ground Floor & First Floor Signature 1 Building, Near Makarba Circle S.G.Road, Renewal of Dealer Agreement Department, BMW Vehicles, BMW Parts, Dealer Agreement, BMW Vehicles, BMW Parts, OMP, BMW India Pvt, Agreed & Accepted, Parsoli Motor Works Pvt. Ltd., Parsoli Motor Works Pvt, BMW, OMP, KPMG, KPMG, KPMG, OMP, ―BMW GROUP India Parsoli Motor Works Pvt, Ground Floor & First Floor, Near Makarba Circle, Department/From Telephone Fax E-mail, Date Subject BMW Parts Dealer Agreement, BMW Vehicles, Dealer Agreement, BMW India Pvt, Parsoli Motor Works Pvt, BMW, BMW, Clause 13.4, OMP, the Supreme Court, State, BMW, Veeravee Ammal v Seeni Ammal, Court, Classic Motors Ltd., Maruti Udyog Ltd, OMP, BMW, Central England Water Transport Corporation Ltd., Brojo Nath Ganguly, Classic Motors Ltd, Maruti Udyog Ltd, the Supreme Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, Classic Motors Ltd., Maruti Udyog Ltd, OMP, BMW‖, BMW, OMP, the Supreme Court, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Amritsar Gas Service, United Industrial Bank Ltd., Rajasthan Breweries Ltd, Cotton Corporation of India Ltd, the Supreme Court, OMP, Parsoli Motors, BMW, Court, OMP, Court, Supreme Court, Adhunik Steels Ltd, M/s, OMP, Adhunik, the Mineral Concession Rules, the District Court, the District Court, the District Court, the Mineral Concession Rules, the High Court, The High Court, the District Court, Adhunik, OMP, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Emphasis, OMP, Channel Tunnel Group Ltd., Balfour Beatty Construction Ltd., The Court of Appeal, the House of Lords, the House of Lords, The House of Lords, AC, Emphasis, OMP, OMM Private Limited, OMM Private Limited, OMM Private Limited, OMM Private Limited, Emphasis, Court, the Supreme Court, OMM Private Ltd, OMM Private Ltd, Adhunik, OMP, The Supreme Court, Adhunik, the Mineral Concession Rules, Adhunik, Adhunik, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Adhunik, ―At, OMP, OMM Private Limited, Emphasis, Arvind Constructions Ltd., Kalinga Mining Corporation, Firm Ashok Traders, the Supreme Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Olex Facas Pvt. Ltd v, Skoda Export Co. Ltd, Court, Court, OMP, Court, Emphasis, Reliance Infocom, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Court, the Clause (ii, Madras High Court, Court, Court, Court, Gujarat Bottling Company, the Supreme Court, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Plaintiff, Court, the High Court, Percept Talent Management Pvt. Ltd., Clauses, the First Respondent, Court, confidence‖. OMP, Court, other‖.33, OMP, Classic Motors, Court, Classic Motors, Court, Classic Motors, Classic Motors Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, SLP(C) No.4490/1995, 28.2.1995 the Supreme Court, the High Court, the High Court, Supreme, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Court, OMP, the Supreme Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Classic Motors, the Supreme Court, Classic Motors, Classic Motors, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Amritsar Gas Service, the Supreme Court, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Amritsar Gas Service, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., IOCL, OMP, ADJ, Civil Revision, the High Court of Punjab & Haryana, IOCL, Supreme, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court, IOCL, Liquified Petroleum Gas, IOCL, disputes.39., AGS, AGS, OMP, IOCL, ADJ, the High Court, the Supreme Court, IOCL, AGS, IOCL, AGS, compensation.43, the Supreme Court, IOCL, the Supreme Court, OMP, IOCL, IOCL, OMP, The Supreme Court, AGS, IOCL, IOCL, the Supreme Court, OMP, the Supreme Court, IOCL, Classic Motors, M/s Competent Motors, Maruti Udyog Ltd, MUL, OMP, M/s Competent Automobiles Pvt. Ltd., M/s. Classic Motors, Court, Court, MUL, SLP, the Supreme Court, SLP, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, MUL, OMP, MUL, Court, Suit No.2005/1994, Court, MUL, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, OMP, Court, the Supreme Court, MUL, the Supreme Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Classic Motors, the Supreme Court, Court, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Indian Oil Corporation, OMP, LPG, IOC, IOC, the High Court, the Division Bench, the High Court, IOC, The Supreme Court, Rajasthan Breweries Ltd, Court, OMP, Stroh Brewery Company, ―Stroh‖, M/s Rajasthan Breweries Ltd, ―RBL‖, RBL, RBL, RBL, RBL, RBL, RBL, OMP, Learned Single, Learned Single, Learned Single, OMP, Determination, Court, Emphasis, the Supreme Court, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., the Supreme Court, Court, Classic Motors, Court, OMP, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Emphasis, Hyderabad Allwyn Ltd, M/s Rohini Times, M/s Hyderabad Allwyn Ltd, ―HAL‖, RT, OMP, CPC, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, OMP, Court, ―if, Pepsi Foods, Honda, Cars India Ltd., MANU/DE/0957/2016, Interkardio Pvt. Ltd., Gyrus Group PLC, ITE India Pvt. Ltd v D.T.T.D.C., Pepsi Foods, Interkardio Pvt. Ltd., OMP, ITE India Pvt, MANU/DE/0299/2016, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, ―No Objection Certificate‖, NOC, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, NOC, NOC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, OMP, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, Reliance, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, ITE, DTTDC, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, DTTDC, ITE, DTTDC, ITE, OMP, ITE, Court, DTTDC, ITE, Court, ITE, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Clauses, ITE, DTTDC, Court, ITE, ITE, DTTDC, Court, OMP, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., OMP, ITE India Pvt, DTTDC, ITE, inter alia, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, ITE, OMP, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd, Classic Motors, Nabha Power Ltd v Punjab State Power Corporation Ltd, ―We, the Supreme Court, OMP, BP Refinery, Shire of Hastings, BMW, BMW, the Eighth Schedule, BMW, BMW, OMP, BMW, BMW, Agreement, BMW, BMW, Clause 11.2, BMW, Agreement, OMP

PERSON: Chetan Sharma, Arjun Seth, Arvind Kumar, C. S., Henna George, Arun Kathpalia, Diwakar Maheshwari, Karun Mehta, Pratishtha Vij, Chetan Sharma, ―purveyorship‖, Premises, Talha, Singh @bmw.in Date, Talha Sareshwala, Ltd.-.sd-, Frank-Emanuel Schloeder, Ltd.-.sd-, Talha Sareshwala, ex-Gujarat, S.G. Road, Genuine Nil Nil B3-IN-H/ Manish, Sachdev, [email protected], Talha Sareshwala, Vikram Pawah Brenner OMP, Colin Page, Talha Sareshwala, Chetan Sharma, Chetan Sharma, Sharma, Chetan Sharma, Rajesh Maanv, Delhi Metro Rail, Sharma, Manjunath Anandappa v Tammanasa,(2003, Sharma, Sharma, Chetan Sharma, Chetan OMP, Sharma, Arun Kathpalia, Chetan Sharma, Sharma, Kathpalia, Kathpalia, Cotton Corporation, pari passu, Act‖, Manjunath Anandappa, Analysis Scope of Section 9, Lew Conservatory Measures, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, Adhunik Steels, proceedings.‖, Dalveer Bhandari, Kumar Das, DRJ618, Yuvraj Singh, Uday K. Lauria, Chetan Sharma, Chetan Sharma, Kathpalia, Civil Misc, Civil Misc, E. Venkatakrishna, E. Venkatakrishna, E. Venkatakrishna, Devinder Gupta, Stroh, Stroh Beer, Stroh, Stroh, Stroh, Stroh, ―no, S. K. Gupta v, Memorandum of Understanding, MoU, Order XXXIX Rules 1, Jai Drinks Pvt. Ltd., Shivansh, E. Venkatakrishna(supra, Simon

LANGUAGE: English, English

GPE: Munich, Germany, the State of Gujarat, Gujarat, Clause, Delhi, year.10, MD, Gujarat, Gujarat, Gujarat, extenso, Gujarat, Gujarat, O.N.G.C., Gujarat, it.‖, Orissa, Bombay, Vishal Gupta, ―AGS‖, Suit No.2544/1994, India, Stroh, Single, Delhi, Delhi, RT, Delhi, RT, reproduction:-"―18

CARDINAL: 1, 75, 2, 1.1.1, 11.1, one, 7, 3, 75, 6, 4, 75, 2, 5.1, 2.5.2, 2.5.3, 5, 75, 1, ONE, 11.1, 1, ONE, 2.1, 14, 11.2.1, 11.2.3, 11.2.4, 11.2.5, 6, 75, 4S, 11.2.6, transferee, 11.2.7, 11.2.8, 11.2.10, 7, 75, 11.2.11, 14, 11.2.12, 11.2.13, 11.2.14, one, 11.2.15, 11.2.16, 11.3, 8, 75 11.3.1, 11.3.2, one, 13, three, two, 9, 75, 11.1, 11.1, one, 10, 75, 380 051, 124, 11.1, 11, 75, 13, 12, 12, 75, 2017.14, 15, 13, 75, 14, 75, 16, 21, 15, 75, about 9 to 10, 1, one, 164, 12, 13, 57, 17, 75, 3, 18, 75, 57, 1, 2, 19, 75, 11.1, 1.1.1, 20, 75, 38, 39, 450, 5, 21, 91 and 92, 11.1, 22, 75, 23, 75, 24, 24, 75, 3, 25, 75, 14, 15, 26, 75, 15, 2, 1, 367, 690g, 21, 27, 75, 25, 28, 75, 24, 25, 29, 75, 26, 6, 3, 161, 30, 75, 29, 95, 9, 31, 75, 31, 2, 1, 32, 4, one, three, 33, 75, 1, 2, 1, 3.2.1995, 3.11.1995, 3.2.1995, 34, 75, 2, 1, 1, 35, 75, 2, 27, 27, 36, 37, 75, 1, 38, 75, 2, 3, 1, 39, 75, 40, 75, 2):45, 2, two, 41, 75, 42, 75, 43, two, 2, three, 44, 75, 6, 450, 45, 75, two, two, 14, 17, 46, 75, 1, 8, 8, 47, 1, 1, 57, 2, 20, 48, 75, 324, 49, 75, 2, 30, 50, 75, 36, 1137and, 51, 75, 1.4, 61, 52, four, 53, 1, 18, 54, executed‖., 55, 75, 56, 75, 2, 74, 57, 75, 180, 2, 3, 5, dealer‖., 58, 75, one, 11.2, 11.1, 8, 59, 75

ORDINAL: 30th, 5th, third, first, third, second, third, third, 9th, 03rd, 24th, 24th, etre, 30th, 5th, 11th, 9th, 9th, 26th, 9th, third, 3rd, 7th, first, second

PRODUCT: Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement‖.11, Para 16, SCC390, Para 24, Lordship, Para 10, 3.2.1995, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Classic, Venkatakrishna, Lordship, ‗it

FAC: the Authorized Premises, the Eighth Schedule, IOC‘s contention

WORK_OF_ART: Contract Goods, this This Agreement, The Commencement Date, Dealer Agreement, Classic Motors, Classic Motors, Civil Appeal of the IOCL, E. Venkatakrishna Vs, interest‖. Clause

NORP: Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, No.of, Sharma, ex-Gujarat, ex-Gujarat, Indian, R., instructive.46, Suit No.2005/1994, Suit No.2005/1994, Indian, ITE‘s

LOC: Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Dealer, Suit No.376/1983, Madras, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge

TIME: 16 of 75 morning, such minute, 30 days.44

EVENT: CLR266 282-283

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //