Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Sharmila Yadav vs.union of India and Ors.

Decided On : Dec-19-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: Shape-II, Constitution, Maternity Benefits Act, Article 42, Article 45, Article 16 and 21 of the Constitution, Article 10 of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, the Maternity Benefit Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, Shape-II

CARDINAL: 19, 2011.2, 1, 2011.4, 2, 9, 784.7, two, 2017.9, 3, 9, 4.16, 21, 4, 9, two, 21, 5, 9, 12, 6, 9, 7, 9, 13, 1, 8, 14, 9, 9

DATE: September, 2017 Pronounced on:19, December, 2017, 6th July, 2011, 2nd August, 2016, 8th February, 2017, 6th July, 28th January, 2006, 7th December, 2009, 27th April, 2010, 1st April, 2008, 13th January, 6th July, 2011, 2009, the vacancy year 2011-12, 1st April, 2009, 22nd March, 2011, 19th July, 2011, 19th June, 2012, 6th July, 2011, 6th July, 2011, 1st January, 2015, 5th January, 2016, 20th July, 2016, 7th June, 2016, 2nd August, 2016, 22nd March, 2011, May, 2012, 8th February, 15th December, 2008, the vacancy year 2011-12, 19th June, 2012, 2012-13, May, 2012, the year 2011-12, the vacancy year 2011-12.10, 15, 16, 1961, gender.11, 6th August, 2015, 24th May, 2013, 14, 16, the age of 6 years, 10 1, 1955, four years, 1961, 1965, 14 to 16 months, four years, 2013, several years, several years, August, 2008, June, the vacancy year 2011-12, the same day, a period of, 3 years, 22nd May, 2017, three months, 2017

PERSON: Ankur Chibber, Manish Mohan, Shivangi Sinha, Manisha Saroha, SANJIV KHANNA, SANJIV KHANNA, J.Sharmila Yadav, Head Constable, W.P.(C, Head Constable, Head Constables, Head Constables (M, Abhishek Kumar Sinha, Head Constable, W.P.(C, Abhishek Kumar Sinha, W.P.(C, Articles 14, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Suchita Srivastava Vs, Nergesh Meerza, Setalvad, W.P.(C, SANJIV KHANNA, DECEMBER19h, W.P.(C

ORG: UNION OF INDIA, JUSTICE NAVIN, the Central Reserve Police Force, Assistant Sub-Inspectors (M, CRPF, Standing Order No.04/2008, the Departmental Promotion Committee, Court, W.P., UOI, Ors, W.P., Bilju A.T. Vs, UOI, Ors, Sub Inspector, Directive Principles, the Supreme Court, Chandigarh Administration, the Delhi High Court, the CRPF Rules, Mahila Battalion, the Supreme Court, Air India, Air Hostess, Court, Regulation, Corporations, the Maharashtra Maternity Rules, Corporations, Corporations, Corporation, Namit Sharma Vs, Union of India, Sub-Inspectors, SSIC, SSIC, NA NAVIN CHAWLA

PERCENT: + %, 8%

FAC: Departmental, Shape-II, Shape-II

ORDINAL: first, third, 7th, 7th, second, second, first, first

LOC: Shape-III

GPE: Articles, India, Bilju A.T., Bombay, Bilju A.T.

NORP: Indian

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //