Lile Ram vs.govt of Nct of Delhi & Ors.

Decided On : Nov-27-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 24(2, Section 4, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 6, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 31(1, Section 11, Section 18, Section 31, Section 18.16, Section 33, Section 24(2, Section 31, Section 24, Section 24(2, Section 18, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, Section 24(2, the New Act, the Land Acquisition Act

MONEY: ~4

DATE: November, 2017 +, 06-00, 23.06.1989, 20.06.1990, 21.03.2007, 2014, 1894, 23.6.1989, 20.6.1990, 19.6.1992, 241/2(2-10, 6-00, 21.3.2007, 1894, 33, 34, more than five years, 2014, 2014, 1894, 2017

PERSON: Lalit Kumar Rawal, Sunil, versus K. Goel, Jyoti Tyagi, Yeeshu Jain, Sanjeev Sabharwal, Hem Kumar, JUSTICE, J.(ORAL, DDA.2, Ghonda Gujaran Khadar, Shahdara, Award, Tyagi, Gujran Khadar, Rs.27, Prem Nath Kapur[3, Tamil Nadu

ORG: GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS, Standing Counsel for, Standing Counsel, DDA, Rehabilitation, Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr, Harakchand Misirimal Solanki &, Court, DDA, DDA, DDA, W.P., Notification u/s 6, the Supreme Court of India, Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr.(supra, W.P., Parliament, Parliament, W.P., Roche, W.P., Court, the Special Land Acquisition Officer, the Supreme Court of India, Court, Pune Municipal Corporation & Anr, Harakchand Misirimal Solanki &, Union of India, Ors, W.P., Singh v. Union of India & Others, Court, CM.APPL203652017(stay, VINOD GOEL, J.W.P.

CARDINAL: 1, 1, 2013(New, 19.06.1992.5, 3, 4, 2, 4, 4, 56, 8, 14 to 20, 14, one, 2, 3, 7, 32, one, 4, 7, 2, 33.18, 31, 31.01.2008, 5, 7, 20, 9, 1, 3, 2, 6, 3, 10.09.2014, 6, 7, 4, 12.09.2014, 5, 12.09.2014, 12, 29.05.2017, 7, 7

PRODUCT: LAC, LAC, Para 4, LAC, LAC

GPE: Khasra, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Delhi, Ghonda, Sections, Nazir, Agnelo Santimano, Delhi

EVENT: the 1894 Act, the 1894 Act

FAC: Sections 32

QUANTITY: 1894 Act

NORP: Girish