Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

National Projects Construction Corporation vs.royal Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Decided On : Oct-10-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 34, Section 120B, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 34, Section 36, the Arbitration Act, Article 59 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Section 44, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, Section 47, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, the Arbitration Act, Section 47, the Arbitration Law, Section 44, the Arbitration Act, Section 44, the Evidence Act, Section 36(1, Section 34, Section 34, Section 5, Section 47, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 44, Section 44, the Evidence Act, Section 44.21, Section 44, the Evidence Act, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, the Arbitration Act, Section 47, Section 47, Section 47, the Arbitration Act, Section 34, Order X Rule 2

DATE: October, 2017, 29th June, 1982, 10th August, 2002, 1996, 26th May, 2008, 9th March, 2010, 19th May, 2014, 19th September, 2014, 24th February, 2015, 19th May, 2014, 19th September, 2014, 10th August, 2002, 1947, 8th June, 2016, two years, 10th August, 2002, 10th August, 2002, 26 3, 25th November, 1983, 30th November, 1985, 10th March, 2017, 1996, 1988, 2009, 2009, Del 1666, 29th October, 2009, 2012, 2013, Del 3299, 2016, 2004, 2010, 24th March, 2017, 24th March, 2017, 10th March, 2017, 10th March, 2017, 30th November, 1985, 30th November, 1985, 26 7, 2011, 1940, 1st May, 2017, 1st May, 2017, 17th May, 2017, 24th March, 2017, 30th November, 1985, 1996, 30th November, 1985, 26 8, 12th September, 2017, eight weeks, 22nd September, 2017, 17th May, 2017, 19th May, 2014, 24th March, 2017, 10th March, 2017, 10th August, 2002, 1872, 2017, the year 1940, 2012, 2006, 1940, 1996, 26 1996 Act, 26 16, 1044, 26 20, 1969, 2006, 24th March, 2017, 17th May, 2017, 2017

ORG: NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Government of India, the State Organization for Food Industry, OMP, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, OMP, FAO(OS, Court, Civil Appeal No.2543/2015, Mool Chand Jain, Ashok Kumar Gaba, CBI Vs, S.K. Relan & Ors, the Prevention of Corruption Act, CBI, CBI, CBI CS, IPC, Sections 5(2, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Arbitral Tribunal, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, OMP No.374/2002, Rs.200/-.5, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, the Special Leave Petition, the Supreme Court, the Prevention of Corruption Act, Bench, Bench, Spentex Industries Ltd., No.69/2009, Kvaerner Cementation India Ltd., Ashok Kalra Vs, Vimal Kishor Shah Vs, AL EDAWIYAH Project, Clause 73 of the Agreement, Arbitrator, the Arbitral Tribunal, Agreement, the Arbitral Tribunal, CPC, IA No.11183/2017, the Supreme Court, Court, OMP, FAO, the Arbitral Tribunal, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, USD, The Supreme Court, Court, CS, Court, Court, House P. Ltd., CPC, Court, Union of India Vs, Jagat Ram Trehan & Sons Vs., Union of India 2001, Court, CPC, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, Court, Court, CPC, MSP Infrastructure Ltd., M.P. Road Development Corporation Ltd., Bharti Cellular Limited Vs, Department of Telecommunications, CPC, Supreme Court, Supreme Court, the High Court, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, Court, Court, Court, CPC, Court, the Civil Court, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Court, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, Union of India, Court, Supreme Court, the first Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Forest Tribunal, Court, Forest Tribunal, Court, Forest Tribunal, CS, CPC, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, Court, Court, Court, Addisons Paints & Chemicals Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, CPC, CPC, CPC

PERSON: Anup J.Bhambhani, Rajat Arora, Jaypreet Singh, Versus ROYAL CONSTRUCTION CO, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1, No.35841/2014, xiii, xiv, M.C. Jain, xvii, M.C. Jain, M.C. Jain, M.C. Jain, M.C. Jain, Mool Chand Jain, M.C. Jain, Counterclaim, Vibhu Bakhru, Vibhu, Roshan Lal Gupta Vs, Bajranglal Agarwal, Panda Vs, Shakuntala Devi, Kishan Singh Vs, Gurpal Singh, D.K. Sharma, Furu Ram, Jagat Ram Trehan, LR41(SC, Jai Narain Parasurampuria Vs, Devi Saraf, Kuppuswami Naiker, Bhikaji Mahadev Gund Vs, Ramchandra Kulkarni, Shripadgouda Venkangouda Aparanji Vs, Govindgouda Narayangouda Aparanji AIR1941Bom, CS, SCC416, M.C. Jain, M.C. Jain, Santram Parma Nand AIR1976Del, CS, J.CS

GPE: Baghdad, Iraq, valorem, Iraq, Ramesh, Kumar, Bombay, Bombay, ILR Delhi, S.P., Kerala

PRODUCT: Agreement, No.1, Rs.20,000/-, Bench, the Order IV Rule 4, The Full Bench

CARDINAL: 1, 26, four, 2, 26, one, one, 3, 26, 5(1)(d, four, 4, two, 5, 26, 3, 6, 26, two, 109, 5, 26 6, 8, 1, 8, 1, 26, 109, 129, 147, 157, 205, 211, 147, 211, 110, 9, 8, 2, 10, 1, 8, 21, 11, 12, 26, 1, 6, 13, 26, 241, 191, 3, 14, 26, 192, 15, 32, 33, 16, 17, 18, 26, 510, one, 19, 587, 20, 26, 21, 26, 22, 26, 5, 23, 26, 24, 26, 25, 26, 26, 26

MONEY: FAO(OS

PERCENT: 18%, 12%, 6%

ORDINAL: first, First, first, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: CS (Comm) No.188/2017 Page 8, Ramesh Kumar Vs, Khanna Traders Vs, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, CS (Comm) No.188/2017, CS (Comm) No.188/2017

NORP: d., IQD13981, Indian

FAC: T.R. Verma Vs., Hamza Haji Vs

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //