Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Shiv Sagar Naik vs.the State Represented By: Cbi

Decided On : Sep-05-2017

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Section 120B IPC, Section 10, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 10, Section 10, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 10 of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 120-A, Section 120-B, Section 10, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 10, Section 120-A, Section 10, Section 10, Section 120-A., Page 11, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10 of the Evidence, Section 10 of the Evidence Act, Section 10 of the Evidence Act, Section 10 of the Evidence Act, Section 120B IPC, Page 15, Section 10 of the Evidence Act, Section 4, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 2A, Section 65B, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 4, Section 4 of the Act, Section 2A. Section 2A, Section 2A, Section 2A, Section 2(8, Section 4, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 2A, Section 65B Indian Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 65-B. Section 65, the Evidence Act, Section 65-B(2).17, Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, Section 45-A, The Evidence Act, Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 65-A of the Evidence Act, Section 65-B of the Evidence Act, Sections 63 and 65, Section 63, Section 65, Section 65-B, Section 65-B, Section 391, Article 21 of the Constitution of India, Section 4 of Section 13, Section 65B, Section 161 of the Cr., Section 65, Section 33, the Evidence Act, Section 33, Section 294 of the Code, Section 293 of the Code, Section 510, section 293, the Evidence Act, the Evidence Act, Section 294, Section 294, the Evidence Act, Section 63 to 65, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 3 of the Evidence Act, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 34, Indian Evidence Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 34, the Evidence Act, Section 4, Section 4, Section 34, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 2A, Section 2A, Section 2A, Section 311A, Section 4, Section 409 IPC, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313(4, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313(4, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 CrPC, Appellant 16, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313, Section 313, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 CrPC, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 30, the Indian Evidence Act, Section 313(4, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr, Section 197, Section 313 Cr, Section 313 Cr

DATE: + + +, March, 2017, September, 2017, 177 + + +, 177 + +, February, 2001, July, 1999 to March, 1999, today, 2004, 1980, 1980, 1872, 2001, 1988, 1964, 1965, 278-80, 1964, 1965, 7 1958, 2005, 1970, 2003, 2009, 2014, 1967, 1891, 2005, 2005, 1715, 2015, 13647, 1986, 1986, 2017, 1973, 1975, 1998, 1967, 1977, 1963, 1967, 1822 5, 2012, June 23, 2006, 2005, 1973, Prior to June 23, 2006, 1920, one year, 29th April, 2008, 2013, A few days, the day, 2010, 2010, 2011, 177 16, 2012, 2012, 2014, 11, 1992, 1964, 1963, 2002, 1514, 2005, 2007, 2008, 1991, 2003, 1996, 2009, 1991, seven years, the month of March 1999, 242361, 276267, 277093, 1968, a month, 18th September, 1999

PERSON: Devashish Maharishi, Avadh Kaushik, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, R.N. Mittal, Puneet Mittal, Amitej Kr, Vasudha Bajaj, versus Represented, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant CHANDRESHWAR MANJHI Represented, P.N. Dhar, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, Nishit Kush, Shyam S. Sharma, Sanjeev Kumar Baliyan, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Nagendra Rai, Ashish Verma, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Kajal Chandra, Swati, Prerna Chopra, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Page 2, Kajal Chandra, Swati, Prerna Chopra, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, Sunita Arora, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Sunil K. Choudhary, B.L. Sharma, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Pramod Kumar Dubey, Singh Rathore, Akshay, Anurag Andley, versus Represented, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, Kajal Chandra, Swati Sinha, Prerna Chopra, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Kajal Chandra, Swati, Prerna Chopra, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, Anunaya Mehta, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Appellant Represented, Kajal Chandra, Swati Sinha, Prerna Chopra, Nikhil Goel, Ashutosh Ghade, Annirudha Deshmukh, Jeet Ram Sharma, A-9, B.M. Ghosh, Hayat Singh, Chandreshwar Manjhi, Nalini, Learned Hand, Delhi Admn, Page 8, Delhi Admn, Kehar Singh v. State, Delhi Admn, SCC, Swarup Lal Bishan Lal v. State, Subba Rao, Subba Rao, Sardul Singh Caveeshar, Swarup Lal Bishan Lal v. State, Mirza Akbar, Cri LJ871:67, Wright, Cri LJ871:67, Sardul Singh Caveeshar, Cri LJ1325, Jagannadhadas, J., Mirza Akbar, Cri LJ871:67, Lordships, Mohd, Yusuf Momin v. State, SCC, Venkatachala Gounder Vs, Jai Kumar Singhal, Venkatachala Gounder, Kumar Gangulay Vs, B.M. Ghosh, N.R. Suman, Narayanan Vs, Bench, Navjot Sandhu, Navjot Sandhu, Navjot Sandhu, Kundan Singh Vs, P.C., Navjot Sandhu, Venkatachala Gounder, Venkatachala Gounder, Venkatachala Gounder, Haryana, Navjot Sandhu, Venkatachala Gounder, Luthra, Chainchal Singh's, Chainchal Singh, Chainchal Singh, Chainchal Singh's, Luthra, Chainchal Singh v. Emperor, process.8, Jaswant Singh Chouhan, Bihari Lal Vs, Chander Vs, Chandra v. State, Cri LJ559, Kumar Banerjee, Kumar Banerjee, Fakhruddin, Alfred Foster's, Will[34 Mich, B. Lal, Bench, Bench, Sapan Haldar, Court-, P.C., Monglu, Hafijuddin, Motilal Motin, Monglu Md., Hafij, Kusrat, Kusrat, Monglu Md., Sanatan Naskar v. State of W.B., Monglu, Monglu, Monglu, Jabbar, PW6Lal Khan, Yusuf Amin, Monglu, Khairuddin, Monglu, Monglu, Hafijuddin, Monglu, Hafijuddin, Agartala, PWs 10, Hemender, Sachindra Sarkar, Archana Garkar, Dipak Sarkar, Gautam Sarkar, Tulsi Biswas, Narayan Das, Mithu Das, Bitu Das, Khelan Sarkar, Sarkar, Chotan Sarkar, Hemender, Hemender, Sachindra Sarkar, Archana Garkar, Dipak Sarkar, Gautam Sarkar, Sukhdev Singh, SCC, Singh Bhagat, Cri LJ1933, Mohan Singh v., Prem Singh, SCC, Kumar Singla, Baldev Krishan Singla, Bishnu Prasad Sinha v. State of, Kadher Sheik Budin, Jaspal Singh, A.V. Reddy, R.L. Kawale, SectionsIPC, SectionsIPC, Sheetla Sahai, Patnaik Vs, R.L. Kawale, A.V. Reddy, Appellant, B.M. Ghosh, B.V. Jagdish, R.K. Puram, R.K. Puram, Accountant CWC, R.L. Kawale, B.S. Yadav, Chander Shekhar, J.P. Sharma, Sunil Kumar, Kamal Sharma, J.P. Sharma, O.P. Narang, Anil Kathuria, R.K. Puram, R.L. Kawale, R.L. Kawale, D-277, R.L. Kawale, R.L. Kawale, Ratan Lal, Nos, R.L. Kawale, B.S. Yadav, R.L. Kawale, R.L. Kawale, Ex, R.L. Kawale, Lal, Page, A.V. Reddy, R.L. Kawale, R.L. Kawale, B.S. Yadav, A.V. Reddy

ORG: Adv, CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, CBI, S K AGARWAL CBI CRL.A., CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION ....., Respondent CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 1, JEET, RAM, CBI, Advs, CBI, CBI, CBI, Page 3, CBI, CBI, Advs, Page 4, CBI, M.E. Haque, CWC, Controller of Accounts, the Controller of Accounts,, Ministry of Water Resources, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 5, DDO/CWC, DDO, LTC, Shiv Sagar Naik, A-7, Natha Ram Suman, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, CBI, Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 7, Apex Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, AIR, para8, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Supreme Court, the applicability of Section 10, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 10, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 12, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 13, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, the Privy Council, Lordships of the Privy Council, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 14, Supreme Court, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, CBI, the Supreme Court, Arulmigu Viswesaraswami & V.P. Temple & Anr, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 16, CBI, CBI, the Supreme Court, Sukumar Mukherjee & Ors, the Supreme Court, P.K. Basheer & Ors, Shiv Sagar Naik, SCR898Chandradhar Goswami & Ors, The Gauhati Bank Ltd., Reliance, Arakkan, Shubhkaran Rameshwarlal Agarwal, Durgaprasad Private Ltd, Bankers’ Book Evidence Act, relevant.—[Entries, Court, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, books.—Subject, Bankers, inter alia, Branch, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, the Supreme Court, Anvar P.V., the Supreme Court, Anvar P.V., Examiner of Electronic, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, India.20, Sections 59 and 65-B, specialibus, Court, VCD, Anvar P.V., CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, the Trial Court under Section 311, Anvar P.V., Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 24, Malay Kumar Ganguly, Supreme Court, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 25, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, NCDRC, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the NCDRC Supreme Court, Commission, Supreme Court, Malay Kumar Ganguly, Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, Anvar P.V., the Trial Court, Court, Court, State, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 27, the Privy Council, The Privy Council, the Privy Council, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 28, the Bombay High Court, the Privy Council, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 29, Court, Court, Sec, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, the Appellate Court, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, NCDRC, the Appellate Court, The Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 33, SCC410Central Bureau of Investigation Vs, the Banker’s Book Evidence Act, the Supreme Court, SCR898Chandradhar Goswami & Ors, Gauhati Bank Limited, Bankers' Books CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, the Banker’s Book Evidence Act, the Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 35, Court, Magistrate, Punjab Supreme Court, U.P., CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, U.P., Court, Court, Court, Vide Gurney v. Langlands, The Supreme Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 37, the Supreme Court of, Court, Court, Sapan Haldar & Anr, Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Supreme Court, U.P. Vs, Babu CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Bench, Bench, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 39, Court, Court, Supreme Court, FIR, FIR, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Section 313 CrPC, Isa Haque, Sudhu, Dabaru, Court, Court, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 41, CrPC, Court, Haryana[(2010, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, Court, Section 313 CrPC, Yusuf, Darbaru, Sabdul, FIR, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 43, The Supreme Court, Section 313 CrPC, the Additional Sessions, inter alia, Saraswati, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 44, Shashi Sarkar, Saraswati Biswas, Bipul Sarkar, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 45, AIR1953SC468:1953, Court, Section 313 CrPC, Court, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Court, Court, Court, Delhi Vs, Court, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 47, CBI, B.V. Jagdish, CWC, R.L. Kawale, No.846597, Trial Court, the CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 48, Learned Trial Court, Reliance, Kerala & Anr., CBI, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 49, CWC, CWC, R.L. Kawale, Trial Court, CBI, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, CBI, CWC, Pay Bill Register, PBR, B.V. Jagdish, Kumar, CWC, No.42861, State Bank of India, R.L. Kawale, No.36903 State Bank of India, CBI, Ratan Lal (PW-16, CBI, Reliance, CBI, Om Prakash Narang, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Allahabad Bank, CWC, No.42861, R.L. Kawale, State Bank of India, B.V. Jagdish Kumar, B.V. Jagdish, LDC, the State Bank of India, R.K. Puram, No.42861, CWC, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Page 52, CWC, No.274501, Kumar, Y.P. Sharma, B.V. Jagdish Kumar, the All India Service Conduct Rules, Additional Sessions, CRL.A. 134/2016 & conn, Allegation (ii, Government, B.S. Yadav, CWC, DDO, Department/ Government, Controller General Accounts, No.846597, CWC, DDO

GPE: Spl, Spl, Spl, SHARMA, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Spl, Singh v. State of A.P., Kerala, Caveeshar, Bombay, Kerala, Noor Mohd, Yesudanam, Singh, Delhi, Generalia, Delhi, P.C., Shaikh Farid's, Ishwari, Shashi, Michigan, Michigan, P.C., P.C., P.C., W.B., Md., Ashok, Brajendrasinghv, Md., Bhaka, IO, Md., Ishahaque, Nasiruddin, Motilal, Motilal, P.C., West Tripura, Dulal, Dulal, Dulal, Hate, Singh v. State, Narain, Singh v. State of Punjab, Devender, P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., P.C., Orissa, O.P. Narang, P.C., CWC Delhi, P.C.

CARDINAL: 150/2016, 259/2016, 280/2016, 240/2016, 269/2016, 297/2016, 847/2016, 177, One, 23,67,951/-, 2000.2, three, 6, one, two, 4.2, 5, 7, 583, 7, 177, 4.3, 11, 2, 38, 1, two, 2, one, 177, 3, one, 4, 5, 687, 2, 561, between two, two, 177, 4.4, 1, 8, one, two, one, 3, 649-51, two, 10, two, 177, one, two, two, two, two, one, one, two, one, 2, 177, 389-91, two, one, two, one, 1, 177, two, 2, one, 3, one, 4, 5, 734-35, 278, two, one, 2, two, one, 177, 279, 180, 177 4.5, 12, 14, two, 1, 2, 699-700, 4.6, two, one, One, 5.2, 8, 177, 5.3, 9, 17, 10, 5.4, 1, 279, 208, 5.5, 34, 5.6, 18, 177, 5.7, 2(8, 2A, 2, 8), 19, 177, 8), 20, 177, 5.8, 21, 177 5.9, three, 11, 14, 2, four, 22, 177, 63 and 65, 11, 5.10, 23, 177, 5.11, 20, two, 177, two, two, 5.12, 177, 26, 177 5.13, 32, 4, 177, 4, 177, 6, 7, 177, 294, 30, 177, 67 to 71, 1, 3, 36, 5.14, 31, 177, two, 5.15, 4, 15, 32, 177, two, 177, 3, 17, 5.17, 1, 6, 34, 5.18, 2(8, 2A, 4, 177, 6.2, 2, 36, 177, 3, 2, 330, 177, 6.3, 6.4., three, 191, three, 38, 177, 6.5, 7.1, One, 7.2, 177, 313, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 7.3, 5, 14, three, three, 40, 177, three, 4/5, 8, 3, 814, 258, 21, 21, 22, 177, 24, 12, 1, 266, 42, 4, 2, 297, 15, 17, two, 177, two, 7.4, 4, 23, 23-4-2005, 13, 177, four, 3, 705, 4, 177, 1, 3, 10, 244, 27, 9, 11, 1, 7.5, 46, 177, 7.6, two, one, 10, 177 7.7, 8, 1, 8.2., 62,000/-, 62,000/-, 177, 8.3, 1, 8, 8.4., 7, 177, two, six, 30.08.1999, six, 21, 8.5, 50, 177, 8, four, six, 21, two, 51, 177, 8.7, eight, eight, three, six, 274, four, eight, 50, four, 53, 8.8, three

ORDINAL: 5th, first, first, second, second, second, first, first, first, first, firstly, secondly, first, first, second, first, second, first, firstly, first, second, first, Second, third, second

PRODUCT: A-15, A-16, Page 9, PW-51, PW-54, F, SCR722, Section 313 Cr, Appellant 16, Appellant 16 Monglu, X-12, A-11, A-10, PW-51

LANGUAGE: English, English, English, English, English, English

QUANTITY: 1 Cri LJ608sub, 1 Cri LJ608sub, 177 allegation

NORP: Indian, Mirza Akbar, Roman Catholic Mission v. State, Statute, American, Ratan

MONEY: 177 Evidence Act, 177 Evidence Act, 62,000/-, ₹1,15,000/-, 60,000/-, 8,45,000/-, ₹20,000/- &, 35,000/-, ₹54,202/- and ₹74,874/-, ₹20,000/- and ₹35,000/-, 67,445/-, 56,194/-, 60,000/-, 15,000/-, 62,000/-

FAC: Sections 59, Sections 59, Govt.

LOC: Betu

WORK_OF_ART: Darbaru severely”.18

TIME: that night, that night

View Full Judgment


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //