Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Tata Power Company Limited vs.union of India & Ors.

Decided On : Mar-09-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 16, Constitution, Section 16, Constitution, Constitution, Article 31-C of the Constitution of India, Article 39(b, the Vesting Orders, Section 16, Article 300-A, Section 21, Section 16, Section 8(4, the Vesting Orders, Section 16, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 16, Section 16, Section 16, Rule 14, Section 16(1, Section 247, Section 16(1, Constitution, Section 27, Section 16 and Rule 14, Section 3(1)(j, Section 27, Article 300-A, Constitution, Constitution, Article 39, Constitution, Article 31-C of the Constitution and, Constitution, Article 39(b, Article 31-C of the Constitution, Article 31-C, Article 31-C of the Constitution, Article 31-C of the Constitution., section 6, section 16, section 16, section 16, section 8, section 16, section 6, section 16, Section 8(4, Section 8(7, Section 9, Section 9, Section 16, Section 16(1, Section 16(1, Section 16, Section 16(1, Section 16, Section 16(1, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 16, Constitution, Section 16(1, Section 16(1, Section 27, Section 16(2, Section 16, Article 14 of the Constitution, Article 31-C of the Constitution, Section 16, Constitution, Section 27.36

PERCENT: 03.2017 %, 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%, 12%

PERSON: CM Nos, P. Chidambaram, Vishrov M., Rohit Venkat, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, CM Nos, Ramji Srinivasan, Devashish Bharuka, Ms Rita Jha, Jatin Sehgal, Ravi Baruka, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, CM Nos, Rajiv Nayar, Sanjeev Kapoor, Gaurav Juneja, Aditya Ganju, Sahil Narang, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain, CM Nos, Petitioners Versus, Rajiv Nayyar, Sanjeev Kapoor, Gaurav Juneja, Aakash Bajaj, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioner W.P.(C, Atul Shanker Mathur, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioner Versus, Rajiv Nayyar, Vijender Singh, Ms Radhika Gupta, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Mr P. Chidambaram, Ms Ekta Kapil, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioners Versus, P. Chidambaram, Chinoy P. Sharma, Singh, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain, Ajay Bhargava, Ms Vanita Bhargava, Petitioner Versus, Gopal Jain, Devashish Baruka, Ms Rita Jha, Ravi Barukha, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, P. Chidambaram, Abhimanya Mahajan, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioner Versus, Gopal Jain, Sanjeev Kapoor, Gaurav Juneja, Aakash Bajaj, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, CM Nos, Kapil Sibal, Ramji Srinivasan, Devashish Baruka, Ms Rita Jha, Ravi Barukha, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioner Versus, P. Chidambaram, Vishrov Mukherjee, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioner Versus, Kumar Singh, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, W.P.(C, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain + W.P.(C, Petitioners Versus, Gopal Jain, Sanjeev Kapoor, Gaurav Guneja, Ravi Barukha, Sanjay Jain, Akshay Makhija, Sanjeev Narula, Kirtiman Singh, Shresth Jain, Vidur Mohan, Ms Aastha Jain, BADAR DURREZ AHMED HON'BLE, SANJEEV SACHDEVA, W.P.(C, Articles 14, Manohar Lal Sharma v., Manohar Lal Sharma v., W.P.(C, Articles 14, Ordinance, deeds‖, W.P.(C, Articles 14, M.L. Sharma v. Union, Articles 14, Rajeev Sarin, to84, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Ordinance, W.P.(C, Articles 14, W.P.(C, Articles 14, W.P.(C, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Articles 300-A, W.P.(C, Ordinance, Articles 14, Coking Coal Limited, SCC147 Rejoinder, W.P.(C, Articles 14, Directive Principle, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, W.P.(C, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, W.P.(C, Schedule II, Schedule II, W.P.(C, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, Schedule, W.P.(C, Gazette, W.P.(C, Schedule, W.P.(C, Schedule, bidder:-"(a, Schedule, Schedule, W.P.(C, Schedule, W.P.(C, Schedule, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Successful, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Articles 14

DATE: 1719/2015, 1300/2015, 2296/2015, 2632/2015, 43, 1451/2015, 1459/2015, 1571/2015, 1677/2015, 1799/2015, 2629/2015, 2830/2015, 2834/2015, 2860/2015, 3210/2015, 5738/2015, 7053/2015, 3229/2015, 3231/2015, 1565/2015, 2791/2015, 2014, 2015, 19, 2015, the previous financial year, the year ending, 19, 2014, 19, year 2014-15, 2013, 19, 19, 14, 1957, the year-ending 31.03.2014, the period of, six months, the previous financial year, 43, between 1993 and 31st day of March, 2011, the 25th August, 2014, 24th September, 2014, 2012, a period of, fifteen days, 43, 1957, 1957, the previous financial year, 1957, a period of ninety days, 43, 2014, Section 3(1)(j, 43, Section 16(1, Rule 14(2, Rule 14(2, 43, the previous financial year, the previous financial year, March 09, 2017

ORG: LIMITED & ANR, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR, Sr Advocate, Mr Apoorva Misra, CGSC, CGSC, Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR, Kapil Sibal Mr, CGSC, CGSC, the Respondent/UoI W.P.(C, Petitioners UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.2803/2015 PRAKASH INDUSTRIES LIMITED, Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.3020-3021/2015 MANDAKINI COAL COMPANY LTD, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANR, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.3203/2015, UTKAL COAL LIMITED & ANOTHER, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA, Sr Advocate, the Respondent/UoI Lakshmi Menon, CGSC, CGSC, CM, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.5087/2015 M/S NILACHAL IRON & POWER LIMITED, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.6047/2015 W.P.(C, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Advocates, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.5776/2015 TATA POWER COMPANY LIMITED, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.5779/2015 M/S SARDA ENERGY & MINERALS LIMITED, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Advocates, Mr J.K. Chaudhary, Ms Swati Surbhi, CGSC, CGSC, CM No.2790/2015, ELECTROSTEEL CASTINGS LTD & ANR, RESPONDENTS UNION OF INDIA & ANOTHER Advocates, Sr Advocate, CGSC, CGSC, the Supreme Court, Principal Secretary & Others:2014, Principal Secretary & Others:2014, the Vesting Order, the Allotment Order, the Supreme Court, Reliance, Another v. State of Uttarakhand, K.T. Plantation Pvt. Ltd., NPV, Resettlement and Rehabilitation, Rehabilitation, the Vesting Order, The Tender Document, the Successful Bidders, Government, the Nominated Authority, Committee, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority, Committee, Committee, Jayaswal Neco Industries Limited, the Chhattisgarh Land Revenue Code, the Successful Bidders under Section 8(4, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development, Tribunal, Tribunal, Committee, Committee, the Ministry of Coal, Ministry of Power, Ministry of Finance, DEA, Ministry of Law and Justice, the Central Mine Planning and Design Institute Limited, Committee, Committee, the Nominate Authority, the Tribunal under Section 27, Government, the Successful Bidders, the Nominated Authority, Government, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Central Government, Coal India Limited, Committee, Tribunal, the Screening Committee, State of A.P., Others v. McDowell & Company, Kuldeep Nayar v. Union, Directive Principle, Reliance, Sanjeev Coke Manufacturing Company, the Union of India, Directive Principle of State, the Central Government, the Supreme Court, the Writ Petition (Criminal, xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx, Nominated Authority, the State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, State Governments, State Government, Minerals (Development and Regulation) Act, the Central Government, the State Government, Schedule, State Government, inter alia, Bar of Jurisdiction, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Coal Bearing Areas (Acquisition and Development, the Central Government, Tribunal, the Central Government, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Supreme Court, a High Court, The Central Government, xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx‖ 23, the Central Government, the State Government, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority and Rule 14(2, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority, the Nominated Authority, Legislature, the Supreme Court, the Nominated Authority, Tribunal, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Tribunal under Section 27, Tribunal

CARDINAL: 1, 2547, 2561-62/2015, 2, 43, 3, 4, 43, 5, 6, 43, J1, 14, 43, 300, 25.08.2014, 9, 9, 14, 8, 43, two, 19, 9, 43, 19, 4, 10, 43, two, 31.03.2014, 6, 300, 31.03.2014, 24.09.2014, 11, 9, 01.04.2015, 7, 14, 300, 8), 9, 189, 191, 12, 43, 13, 43, 14, 43, one, one, 1, 14, 15, 16, 43, 33.38, 31.03.2014, 17, 43, 31.03.2014, 31.03.2014, 31.03.2015, 31.03.2015, 12, 300, 18, 43, 1, 19, four, 20, 43, 31.01.2015, 31.03.2014, 21, 43, 31.03.2014, 31.03.2015, 31.03.2015, 22, 43, 14, 23, 43, 300, two, 2, 3, 96, two, 54, 24, 43, 19, 1, 21, 54, 21.04.2015, 25, 43, 300, one, 26, 43, 1, 27, 8, 1, 2, 1, 3, 4, 28, 5, 6, 8), 29, 43, 9, 10, 8), 11, 9, 12, 1, 2, 4, 30, 43 9, 16, 1, 2, 3, 4, 31, 43, 27, 1, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 31, 1, 32, 2, 1, 2, 14, 14, 1, 1, 2, 33, 43, 2, 2, 1, 24, 34, 35, 43, 14, 36, 43, two, 1, 1, 37, 43, 38, 39, 43, 40, 43, 31.03.2014, 31.03.2014, 31.03.2014, 41, 43, 31.03.2014, 19, 300, 42, 43, 300, 43, 43

WORK_OF_ART: Ordinance, The Successful Bidders, the Constitution of India, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, the Successful Bidders, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance, Ordinance and Rule 14 of the said Rules, Ordinance and Rule 14 of the said Rules

GPE: grounds:-"(a, India, India, India, India, India, India, India

PRODUCT: Articles 14, Rule 14, Articles 14, Sanjeev Coke, Rules, infrastructure‘.33, Articles 14

ORDINAL: secondly, first, Seventh, first, first

EVENT: the Second Ordinance

MONEY: twelve per cent

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //