Bayer Corporation vs.union of India & Ors

Decided On : Mar-08-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 84, the Patents Act, Section 48, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 84(4, the Patents Act, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, the ‗Bolar Provision, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, the Patents Act, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 84, the Patents Act, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 84(6, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A and Section 84; ii, Section 107A, Section 107A.12, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A.14, Section 107A, the Hatch Waxman Act, the Patents Act of USA, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 48, section 47, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A.28, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Article 286 of the Constitution of India, A Constitution Bench, Section 107A, Article 286 of the Constitution above, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Article 19(1)(g, Section 107A, Section 48 of the Act, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Constitution, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 48, Section 107, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 3(2, Section 4, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 48, Section 107A, the TRIPS Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, Article I Clause 1 of the TRIPS Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, Article 7, Article 8 of the TRIPS Agreement, the TRIPS Agreement, Section 5, Article 27, Article 28, Article 30, Article 30, Article 31 of the TRIPS Agreement, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, the TRIPS Agreement, Article 31, Section 107A, the TRIPS Agreement, the Disputes Settlement Body, Section 107A.53, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 84, the Patents Act, Section 90(1)(vii, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 84, the Patents Act, Section 107A, Section 84(6, the Patents Act, Section 107A of the Act, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A.72, Section 107A, Section 107A, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A, the Patents Act, Section 107A

DATE: March, 2017, 1971/2014, 1970, 9th March, 40 2012, 26th March, 2014, 23rd May, 2014, 1940, November, 2014, 7th September, 2015, 8th July, 2016, 1945, 2006, 48, 13th May, 2011, 28th July, 2011, two years, 20 years to, 22 or more years, two or more years, the year 2020, only two years, 23rd October, 2013, two years, 14th December, 2016, 15th December, 2016, 15th December, 2016, 15 days, 14th February, 2017, 40 15, 1983, 1984, two years, the year 2002, the year 2003, 2004, 2012, 2007, 1973, 2007, SCC230it, 40 21, two years, 40, 40, 40, 2006, the year 2002, 40, 1995, 1988, 2006, 1994, 2005, 1997, 1997, 1982, 1954, 40, only two years, 2017

PERSON: W.P.(C, Sudhir Chandra, Sanjay Kumar, Arpita Sawhney, Arun Kumar Jana, Ripu Daman Bhardwaj, T.P. Singh, Prashant Tyati, P. Venkat Reddy, Anand Grover, Rajeshwari, Aparna Gaur, Tahir, Gajendra, Pravin Anand, Archana Shanker, Aditya Gupta, Utkarsh Srivastava, Defendant W.P.(C, Prathiba M. Singh, Saya, Vivek Ranjan, Rohin Koolwal, Sutapa Jana, Devanshu Khanna, RAJIV SAHAI ENDLAW1, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, Compulsory Licence, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, Compulsory Licence, Controller, W.P.(C, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, No.1971/2014, Compulsory Licence, Natco, Compulsory W.P.(C, Compulsory Licence, SORAFENIB, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, Compulsory Licence, W.P.(C, Schedule Y Appendix, W.P.(C, Natco, Compulsory Licence, Natco, W.P.(C, Natco, Compulsory Licence, W.P.(C, Compulsory Licence, Ben Banushali Vs, Yogendra Rathore, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, W.P.(C, xxxiv, Natco, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, W.P.(C, 572 F. Supp, W.P.(C, Joginder Patjoshi, W.P.(C, G.P. Singh, Dharam Pal, W.P.(C, Raghunath Rai Bareja Vs, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, ‗sale‘/, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Sushil Mehra, W.P.(C, Ben Banushali Vs, Yogendra Rathore, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, purposes.54, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, Ghanshyam K. Zaveri 2001, Merit, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, adjudication.62, W.P.(C, Compulsory License, Compulsory W.P.(C, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, Compulsory Licence, W.P.(C, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, Natco, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, W.P.(C, No.1971/2014, W.P.(C

ORG: BAYER CORPORATION, UNION OF INDIA & ORS, Adv, R-1 & 6, R-5, GMBH & ANR ....Plaintiffs Through, ALEMBIC PHARMACEUTICALS LTD, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, the Customs Authorities, Natco Pharma Limited, the Customs Ports, Bayer Corporation, Bayer, Bayer, the Patent Office, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, the Compulsory Licence, HCC, RCC, the Compulsory Licence, the Customs Authorities, Natco, Court, the Drug Controlling Authority, Bayer, gm, Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient, API, Natco, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, API, Natco, Court, the Compulsory Licence, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, LPA, Bayer, the Compulsory Licence, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, API, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Natco, Natco, Natco, API, API, API, API, API, Bayer, API, the Compulsory Licence, China Food and Drug Administration, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, the Drug Controlling Authority, the Drug Regulatory Authority, the Compulsory Licence, Bayer, the Compulsory Licence, xiv, API, API, the Compulsory Licence, Natco, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, The Bombay Co. Ltd., Bayer, Natco, Sections 107A, Intermedics INC Vs, Ventritex Co. Inc, Sections 90, the Panel Report, the World Trade Organization, the European Communities, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Bayer, Natco, Bayer, the Drug Regulatory Authorities, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, API, API, API, Court, the Supreme Court of Poland, Court, the Panel Report, the World Trade Organization, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, API, Bayer, No.1592/2016, Bayer Intellectual Property GmbH, Bayer Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bayer, Alembic Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Bayer, the European Union, Drug Master File, the United States Food and Drug Administration, the United States Food and Drug Administration, Alembic, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Alembic, Court, Alembic, Bayer, Bayer, Bayer, Alembic, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Roche Products, Inc., Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Roche Products, Inc., Bolar Pharmaceutical Co., Bolar Provisions in Patent Laws, API, Court, Alembic, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, the Joint Parliamentary Committee, State, Bayer, g) Supreme Court, API, Bayer, The Indian Legislature, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Legislature, Legislature, Supreme Court, Guru Jambheshwar University Vs, Legislature, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, STO, National Bank, Legislature, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, API, API, API, API, API, Fine Chemical Producers, API, Fine Chemical Producers, API, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Bayer, Natco / Alembic, Bayer, Natco / Alembic, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Fine Chemical Producers, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, the Supreme Court, Burmah Shell Oil Storage, Distributing Company of India Ltd., State, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Bayer, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Supreme Court, Union of India Vs, Asian Food Ltd., Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Supreme Court, Nand Kishore Mehra Vs, Statute, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Reliance, Natco/Alembic, the Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights, the TRIPS Agreement, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, Bayer, the TRIPS Agreement, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bolar, the Indian Generic Industry, Bolar, the World Trade Organization, European Communities, the Polish Supreme Court, Bayer, Court, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Union of India, Court, API, the Supreme Court, Mafatlal Industries Ltd. Vs, Union of India, Court, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Courts of India, Supreme Court, Union of India, Food Industries Vs, Suwert & Dholakia, CriLJ1707the High Court, Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, The High Court, State of Maharashtra Vs, Bayer, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Natco, Bayer, Court, No.1971/2014, Natco, Compulsory License, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, HCC, RCC, the Territory of India.‖ 63, Bayer, Natco, Natco, the Compulsory License, Natco, Bayer, Bayer, Compulsory, Natco, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Controller, Bayer, Bayer, Natco, Natco, HCC, RCC, Natco, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Compulsory, Bayer, Bayer, No.1592/2016, Bayer, Bayer, Natco, Board of Directors, Bayer, No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM, Bayer, J.W.P.(C), No.1971/2014 & CS(COMM

CARDINAL: 1, No.5, 2, one, 15, 3, 40, 4, 40, 5, 40, 122B(1)(a, 6, 40, 7, 40, 8, 40, 8, 12, 84, 991, 808, 93, 9, 40, 10, 40, 27,28, 30, 11, 40, one, 12, 40, one, at least 90, 13, 255, 14, 40, 12, 9, 15, 40, 152, two, 2).19, 2, 16, 40, 1, 2, 107A., 17, 18, 19, 20, 40, 21, 40, 30, 22, 40, 23, 40, one, 24, One, 25, 40, 84(7, 90(1, 92A, 26, 107A, 27, 40, one, 28, 40, two, one, 29, 4 SCC572, 3(3, 30, two, 12, 31, 40, 32, 40, 33, 6, nine, 5, 34, 40, 9, 2, 35, 36, 40, 37, 40, 38, 40, 39, 40, 40, 40

GPE: India, India, India, CS(OS, India, India, China, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, China, China, India, xxii, Padma, USA, xxvii, India, India, xxxv, China, China, India, India, India, Articles, Singapore, Singapore, India, India, China, Alembic, Alembic, the United States of America, Alembic, Alembic, Brazil, Palestine, E.D.N.Y., India, India, India, India, USA, UK, Germany, Australia, New Zealand, India, India, India, India, Courts, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, exporting.46, India, India, Padma, India, India, Singapore, Singapore, States, Canada, India, India, India, India, India, Kerala, Bombay, India, India, India, India, India, India, India, India

WORK_OF_ART: Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco under Section 107A of the Act, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco under Section 107A, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, 11th Edition, 13th Edition, Hiralal Ratanlal Vs, 48., Black‘s Law Dictionary, Drugs Act, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco, Natco

QUANTITY: 1 Kg, 13 SCC542has

ORDINAL: third, 5th, first, first, first, third, third, first, third

LOC: Europe, Europe

NORP: Indian, Indian, Indian, Chinese, Chinese, Indian, Indian, Canadian, Chinese, Indians, State.33

TIME: the minutes

FAC: 10th Edition, the Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, Sushil Kumar Sharma Vs, Compulsory Licence.68