Omaxe Ltd vs.pvp Entertainment Ltd & Anr.

Decided On : Oct-27-2016

Court : Delhi

LAW: Section 37, Section 17, the Collaboration Agreement (, Section 11, Section 42 of the Act, Section 4 of the Act, Section 42 of the Act, Section 37, Section 9, Section 42 of the Act, Section 37, Section 42 of the Act, Section 37, Section 42 of the Act, Section 42 of the Act, Section 42 of the Act, Section 27, Section 14, Section 42 of the Act, Section 42 of the Act, the Constitution Bench, Section 9, Section 9 of the Act, Section 37, Section 42 of the Act, Section 42, Section 37, Section 42, Section 42 of the Act, Section 37, Section 17, Section 37, Section 17, Section 9, Section 14, the Limitation Act

CARDINAL: 4/2015, 1, 1, 43, 42, 43, 2, 8, 3, 2, 2, 3, 42, 4, 8, 8, One, 2, one, 5, 8, two, 9, more than one, one, one, 6, 8, one, 9, 2, 2, 8, 8

ORG: & IA No.25831/2016 IN, PVP ENTERTAINMENT LTD & ANR, Court, CA, Arbitration, the Indian Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Delhi/New Delhi, Jurisdiction The Courts, Ludhiana, the Court of the learned, Ludhiana under Section 9, Court, the High Court of Punjab, Court, the Bombay High Court, Ludhiana, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Bharat Aluminium Company Limited, Kaiser Aluminium Technical Services Inc., Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Act.10, Court, the Bombay High Court, Anil Kumar, the High Court, Court, Ludhiana, CA, Court, Court, Swastik Gases Pvt, Indian Oil Corporation Ltd., Court, Court, Court, Court, the civil Court, Court, Court, Court, Court.14, Court, Court, Court, Appellant, Court

PERSON: Ramesh Singh, Shalabh Singhal, Rohit Kumar, Abinash Agarwal, Ankur Gupta, Chetan Sharma, Vikas Goel, Kunal Dutta, Arushi, JUSTICE S. MURALIDHAR, Chetan Sharma, Sharma, Addendum, Sharma, Sharma, Haryana, Sharma, Ramesh Singh, Chandrakant P. Sanghvi, Anil Kumar, Arb, Arb, Chandrakant P. Sanghvi, Arb, Order XXXIX Rules 1, Rm S. MURALIDHAR, J Arb

PERCENT: 1 + %

DATE: 1996, 12th October, 2015, today, 28th April, 2005, 1996, 2016, 2012, 2013, 1963

FAC: Clauses 42, Additional District, Jurisdiction Notwithstanding

PRODUCT: Appellant, Respondent, Respondent, Appellant

ORDINAL: Secondly, Secondly, first, first

GPE: Singh, Singh, Delhi, Bombay, Ludhiana, Delhi, Delhi, Ludhiana, Ludhiana

NORP: application‟

LOC: Respondent, Single