Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Hpl (India) Limited & Ors vs.qrg Enterprises and Another

Decided On : Feb-14-2017

Court : Delhi

Notice (8): Undefined index: topics [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 36]
Warning (2): Invalid argument supplied for foreach() [APP/View/Case/meta.ctp, line 39]

LAW: Page 1, Section 13, Section 13, Section 37, Section 13(2, Section 13, section 13, section 37, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Page 5, section 144, section 35A, section 91, section 92, section 91, section 92, section 95, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, Section 37, Section 37, Section 37(1, Section 13, Page 10 of 52 Division of that court, Section 37, Section 13, Order 43, Section 37, the A&C Act, Order 43, Section 37, the A&C Act, Section 37, Section 13, Section 37, the A&C Act, Section 37, the A&C Act, Section 13(2, Page 11, Section 13, Section 37, Section 13(2, Section 21, Section 13, Section 10, Section 21, Section 13, Section 8, Page 13, Section 13, Section 13(1, Section 50(1)(b, Section 10, Section 37, Page 15 of 52 Division, Section 13(1, Section 13(1, Page 16, Section 13, Section 13, Section 37, Section 10, Section 10, section 5, Section 104, Section 10, Section 10, Section 13(2, Section 37, Section 13, Section 13(2, Page 21 of 52 Therefore, Chapter IV, Section 21, Section 16, Section 16, Section 13, Chapter IV, Section 2(9, Section 2(9, Page 25, Section 13, the Limitation Act, Article 116 of the Schedule, the Limitation Act, Article 117, Section 5, Article 117 of the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 13(1, Section 37, Section 104, Section 37, Section 13, Page 32, Order under Section 37, section 13, Page 33, section 10, section 16(2, Section 10, section 8, section 13, Page 36, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Section 104, Order 43 Rule 1, the Code of Civil Procedure, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Section 202, the Companies Act, the Companies Act, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Section 104, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Order 43 Rule 1, Section 2 of the Code of, Section 2, Section 47, Section 144, the Code of Civil Procedure, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 2, Section 10, Section 2(9, Section 10, the Code of Civil Procedure, Section 16, Section 10, Page 44, Section 10, Charter, Page 45, Article 225 of the Constitution of India, Charter, Section 13(1, Section 10, Section 13(1, Section 50, Section 50(1)(b, Section 13 of the Act, Section 13, Section 5 of the Act, Section 50 of the 1996 Act, Section 50 of the 1996 Act, Section 50(1)(b, Section 13, Page 47, Section 13, Section 13, Section 13, Page 48, Section 13(1, Section 13, the Commercial Courts Act's, the Letters Patent Act, Section 104(1, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 10, Section 13(2, Section 13(1, Section 13, Section 13(2, Page 52

ORG: FAO, CORAM:-"HON’BLE MR, inter alia, FAO, CPC, the Commercial Division, the Commercial Courts, Commercial Division, Commercial Appellate Division of High Courts Act, Reliance, Letters Patent, a High Court, Commercial Court, FAO, CPC, the Commercial Division, CPC, Letters Patent, FAO, the Statement of Objects, CPC, I. “Statement of objects, the Commercial Court, Commercial Courts, the Commercial Court, Commercial Division, the Commercial Appellate Division, FAO, a Commercial Division, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Letters Patent, a High Court, Commercial Court, The Commercial Division, Commercial Court, the State Government, FAO, CPC, Court, a Civil Court, FAO, Court, FAO, Order IX, Order IX, Order XXI, Order, FAO, the Appellate Court, CPC, FAO, Letters Patent, a High Court, Commercial Court, the Letters Patent, Division Bench, Arcadia Shares & Stock Brokers Pvt, FAO(OS, the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, the Commercial Appellate FAO, inter alia, the Commercial Courts Act, inter alia, CPC, the Letters Patent, a High Court, Commercial Court, the Commercial Courts Act.‖, FAO, the Statement of Objects, a Commercial Court, Commercial Division, CPC, FAO, FAO, Khimji, Khimji, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, FAO, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, Section 104, CPC, Commercial Court, Letters Patent, the Commercial Court, Commercial Division, Section, FAO, Division Bench, the Bombay High Court, Hubtown Limited v. IDBI Trusteeship Services, the Bombay High Court, CPC, the High Court, Court, a Division Court, Division Courts, the High Court of Punjab, the High Court, FAO, Section 104, CPC, CPC, Section 104, CPC, Reliance, Iridium India Telecom Ltd, under:-"―32, Court, AIR1958SC255, FAO, L&S, Maharashtra State Board of Secondary, Education, CPC, CPC, High Courts, CPC, Section FAO, Sections, the Bombay High Court, Hubtown Limited, the Letters Patent, Reliance, Harmanprit Singh Sidhu, FAO, the Bombay High Court, Hubtown Limited, the Statement of Objects, FAO, CPC, the Commercial Division, Commercial Court, CPC, FAO, CPC, the State Government, CPC, CPC, CPC, CPC, the Commercial Division, the Commercial Court, the Commercial Appellate Division, Commercial FAO, Commercial Divisions, CPC, the Commercial Division, CPC, Court, CPC, CPC, a Civil Court, CPC, CPC, a Civil Court, FAO, CPC, Appellate, Sections 104, CPC, CPC, FAO, CPC, Commercial Appellate Division, the Commercial Court, the Commercial Division, CPC, Court, FAO, Commercial Division, Appellate Court, the Commercial Appellate Division, Division Benches, the High Court, the High Court, the Commercial Appellate Division of the High Court, a High Court, the Appellate Division of the High Court, the Commercial Appellate Division, FAO, Court, the High Court, the High Court, a Commercial Division, CPC, FAO, CPC, Civil Court, CPC, CPC, CPC, CPC, Section 104, Section 104, FAO, Section 104, CPC, a Commercial Division, CPC, Order XLIII.31, CIT v. Indo-Mercantile Bank, the Supreme Court, Jammu & Kashmir, FAO, Ram Narain Sons Ltd., Macmillan, Madras & Southern Maharatta Railway Co., Vide also Corporation of City of Toronto, FAO, SCC632 the Supreme Court, Ginning Factory, Calcutta Tramways Co. Ltd., Calcutta, Section, CPC, FAO, CPC, CPC, a Civil Court, Act.34, Letters Patent, Commercial Court, inter alia, the Delhi High Court, Order XLIII CPC, section 104 CPC, Order XLIII CPC, FAO, the Commercial Division of the High Court, FAO, Khimji, CPC, CPC, Khimji, FAO, the Bombay High Court, High Courts, High Courts, These High Courts, Jammu & Kashmir, Probate, High Courts, Section 104 CPC, the High Court, the Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, Section 104, the High Court, FAO, High Courts, xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx, Section 104, the High Courts, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Courts, xxxxx xxxxx xxxxx, the High Court, Court, FAO, the Supreme Court, the High Court, Bench, the High Court, the High Court, The Supreme Court, The Supreme Court, the Calcutta High Court, FAO, The Supreme Court, Letters Patent, the Supreme Court, the Division Bench, FAO, the Bombay High Court, the Rangoon High Court, The Supreme Court, CPC, Letters, the Letters Patent, FAO, the Supreme Court, the Allahabad High Court, the Supreme Court, ―Decree‖, Court, FAO, FAO, the High Courts, CPC, the Letters Patent of High Courts, CPC, Letters Patent, the Commercial Division, the Commercial Court, CPC, FAO, Commercial Court, High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, the Letters Patent, Fuerst Day Lawson Limited v. Jindal Exports, the Supreme Court, the High Court, the Letters Patent FAO, the High Court, Letters Patent, the High Court, the High Court, the Commercial Appellate Division, the Letters Patent, Letters Patent, The Supreme Court, the High Court, Letters Patent, The Letters Patent Appeal, Letters Patent Appeal, FAO, the Letters Patent, CPC, CPC, the Supreme Court, Letters, CPC, CPC, FAO, Commercial Court, the Bombay High Court, Hubtown Limited, the Commercial Court, Commercial Division, XLIII, CPC, the Hon'ble Supreme Court, Bank Ltd., CPC, CPC, Commercial Division Bench, FAO, the Commercial Appeal, the Bombay High Court, CPC, CPC, FAO, Sections 13, Sections 13, CPC, Commercial Court, FAO, FAO

PERSON: Jaideep Gupta, Sanjeev Sindhwani, Sanjay Dua, M. Paul, Prateek Dwivedi, Rajiv Nayyar, Ms Pratibha M. Singh, Sudeep Chatterjee, Ms Kangan Roda, Saurabh Seth, Anmol Sood, BADAR DURREZ AHMED, Order XLIII, Order XLIII CPC, Order XLIII, Order XLIII, Reasons, Order XLIII, context,--, XLIII1 Appeal, Order XI, Order XXI, Order XXI, Order, Order XXXIII, Order XXXV, Order XXXIX, Order XLI, Order XLIII, Harmanprit Singh Sidhu, under:-"―8, Reasons, Order XLIII, Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania & Another:1981, Order XLIII CPC, Order XLIII, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, ―no, Act‖, Order XLIII, R.S. Raghunath v. State, Krishan Kumar v. State, Sultana Begum, Prem Chand Jain, para AIR1984SC1543, construction.33, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Reasons, Schedule, decisions.27, Articles 116, Order XLIII, Supp, Abdul Jabar Butt v. State of, Bhagwati, Ali M.K. v. State, Mullins, Surrey, LT128, Shah Bhojraj Kuverji, Corpn, Order XLIII, Order XLIII, Order XLIII, ―no, Order XLIII CPC, Khimji, Bench, Bench, Bench, Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, Sundari Dassi, Haran Chandra Saha, Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, Order XLIII Rule 1, Order XLIII Rule 1 CPC, Khimji, Dayabhai Jiwandas, Alak Nath, Alak Nath, Sulaiman, Khimji, Order XLIII, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Arun Dev Upadhyaya, Order XLIII, Khimji v. Jayaben D. Kania:1981, Midnapore Peoples' Co-op, Order XLIII, Order XLIII, Order

GPE: Ms Jaya Mandelia, I.A., No.15867/2016, Delhi, Venkataramana Devaru, Karnataka, Rajasthan, Bhupeshkumar, Bezwada Municipality, Canada, Kerala, Bombay, Delhi, Khimji, Mathura, Khimji, Khimji, follows:-"―It, Khimji, Khimji, Khimji, construction.55

CARDINAL: 20.12.2016, 52, 1, 2, 1, 2, 3, 3, 8, 13, 4, 52, 2, 16, 1, 2, 3, 2, 9, 14, 6, 104, 2, 10, 10A, 9, 13, 21, 34, 72, 92, 1, 106, 1, 105, 9, 10, 2, 5, 7, 3, 4, 2, 3, 6, 8, 1, 2, 2A, 4, 10, 1, 4, 19, 21, 23, 23A, 4, 9, 52, 30.09.2016, 9, 12, 52, two, 11, three, two, 9, 14, 52, 1, 1, two, 2, 2, 1, 17, 1966.18, 2, 32, 33, 29, 1, 18, 2, 19, 4, 11, 11, 1, 12, 12, 4, 20, two, 19, 16, 21, 26, 20, 1966.22, 1, 2, 22, 52, 3, 21, 1, 23, 52, four, two, 24, 52, 100 to 103, 106, two, two, 1, 26, 52, 27, 117, one, 28, 52, only two, 29, 52, 2, 59, 30, 52, 2, 11, 122, 31, 52, 11, 5, 1, 52, 2, 34, 52, one, 35, only two, 1, 2, 52 section 10, 15, 37, 52, 28, 15, 33, 38, 52, one, 15, 361, 15, 15, 39, 79, 15, 15, 40, 52, 15, 41, 52, 620, 29, 111, 9, 2, 42, 52, 113, 2, 15, 43, 1, 2, 52, 8), 52, 46, 52, 13, 52, 52, 33, 1, 1, 1, 4, 49, 50, 52, 16, 16, 51, 52, 56, 52

DATE: 1218/2016, 1908, 2015, 1996, 52, 1966, 52 5, sixty days, 1908, 1996, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1908, 52, 1966, 1996, Section 37(1)(a, 60 days, 1996, 1908, 1966, 1996, 1966, Section 13(1, 52 12, Section 13(1, 1966, 1996, 1996, 1996, Section 13(2, Section 13(2, 52 16, 1996, 1966, 52 17, 1966, 1958, 1992, 52 19, 1992, 1991, 1997, 1984, the year 2002, 52 13, 1996, 52, 1908, 60 days, 96 to 99A, Section 13(1, 52, 1963, 1963, 90 days, 30 days, 60 days, 90 days, 60 days, 52, 60 days, 1963, 30 days, 1963, 90 days, 30 days, 60 days, Section 13(1, 1996, 1996, 1957, 1955, 1944, 1946, 2003, 1880, 32, 1996).33, Section 13(1, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, 1966, 52 39, 42, 52 44, almost a century, 1908, 52 47, 1966, Section 13(1, 1966, 1966, Section 13(1, 1966, Section 13(1, 1966, 1996, 50, 1996, 1966, 52, 52, 1966, 1966, February 14, 2017

NORP: Indian, Order XXII, Order XXII, Indian, Letters, Letters

MONEY: xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, 52 xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, 52 xxxx xxxx xxxx xxxx, xxxx xxxx xxxx, 6 xxxx xxxx xxxx

PRODUCT: Schedule, Order VII, Schedule, Calcutta, Section 104, Bench, Section 104, Section 104, a Full Bench

TIME: 21., 52 to Section 10, the earlier Code of 1882

EVENT: this Act.‖ II, Sections 5

LOC: Order XLIII CPC.7, Order XLIII, Madras, Mt. Shahzadi Begum, Mt. Shahzadi Begam, Single

ORDINAL: first, Secondly, third, second, First

FAC: Harmanprit Sidhu, Sections 16

WORK_OF_ART: Subhash Chandra Yograj Sinha

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //