Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax - 11 vs.shri Dinesh Kumar Mathur
Decided On : Jan-24-2017
Court : Delhi
LAW: Section 194, Section 195(2, Section 40(a)(ia, Section 194C, Section 201, the Ansal ITA4362016 Page 2, Section 40(a)(ia, Section 40(a)(ia
NORP: ITA4362016, ITAT, ITAT, ITAT
PERSON: Zoheb Hossain, Appellant Versus SHRI, MATHUR, Kapil Goel, Mukul Gupta, JUSTICE S. RAVINDRA BHAT HON'BLE, Rs.3,19,66,460/-, Kumar Sharma, The Agra Bench, Rs.3,19,66,460/-
EVENT: the Assessment Year
GPE: A.Y., A.O., A.O., A.O.
DATE: 2008-09, 2010, 34, 26th August, 2015, 1st April, 2005, 2004, 2017
CARDINAL: 2, 5, 19.11.2015, 4, 210, 5, two, 3, 5, one, 5, 5, 5
ORG: inter alia, M/s. Aakriti Creation Pvt. Ltd., ITA4362016 Page 1, M/s Aakriti Creation Pvt. Ltd., the Tribunal in Grandprix Fab, CIT, Court, Income Tax v. Dr. Jaideep, Income Tax, ITA1602015, Court, M/s Aakriti Creation Pvt. Ltd., the Agra Bench, Rajiv Kumar Agarwal, ACIT, ITA, Delhi High Court, Finance, Court, M/s Aakriti Creation Pvt. Ltd., Parliament, AO, AO, M/s Aakriti Creation Pvt
ORDINAL: second, second, second, second, second
WORK_OF_ART: The Ansal Land Mark Township
MONEY: No.2) Act
FAC: the ITA4362016 Page 4