Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Naveen Kumar Jain vs.indu Jain

Decided On : Jan-09-2017

Court : Delhi

LAW: the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13B(1, Section 13B, Section 5A, Section 18, Order 32A, Act 104, Section 13B, Family Court Act, Section 13B(2, Section 13B, Section 13B, Hindu Marriage Act, section 13B(2, section 13B(2, section 13B(2, section 14, section 13, Section 13B, The Hindu Marriage Act, Section 23 of the Act, Section 23(1, Section 125 Cr, Section 125 of the Code, Section 23, the Indian Contract Act, Section 125 of the Code, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 74, Section 30, the AC Act, Section 21, Order 23 Rule 3 of the Code, Section 74, the AC Act, Section 21, Section 13B of the Act, Section 13B of the Act, Section 13B(1, Section 13-B, Section 13-B. Mutual, Section 13B(1, Section 13B(2, the Hindu Marriage Act, Article 142 of the Constitution the Supreme Court, Section 13-B, Article 142 of the Constitution, the Hindu Marriage Act, Article 142 of the Constitution, Section 13, the Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13-B, Article 142 of the Constitution, Section 13B(1, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(1, Section 13- B of the Cont, Hindu Marriage Act, Section 13B., Section 13B, Section 13B(1, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(1, Section 13B(2, Section 13B(1, Section 13B(2

DATE: + + +, 8610/2015, 15724/2016, 28622/2016, 29 + + +, 15728/2016, 1116/2016, 29 + + +, 1147/2016, 1251/2016, January, 2017, 1955, 1251/2016, 1971, 1955, 2008, 2010, Del 1962, at least 6 months, six months, 1999, 1973, 54, six months, six months, 1991, 1971, 2004, 2005, 2003, 2003, 1988, 1974, 1976, 1976, 1955, 1984, 1955, 1955, 2nd August, 13B, 1955, differences.11, 1955, 1955, 2008, 1976, 1976, six months, six months, six months, six months, the period of, six months, one year, 1979, 1955, 15th January, 1990, 1955, 1777, 1924, 29 July, 2009, 1872, 29 17, 2011, 2010, 1987, 1987, 1955, 1955, 1976, one year, earlier than six months, later than eighteen months, 1955, six to eighteen months, 1991, 6 to 18 months, 12th edn., 1972, 2011, 2009, the period of six months, 1955, 1955, 1955, six months, 1955, six months, 29 24, six months, 1955, 1956, 04.04.2016, 2010, 1998, 1426, 18, 2003, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 1955, 07th February, 2017, 2017

GPE: C.M. APPL, CONT.CAS(C, CONT.CAS(C, CONT.CAS(C, Cont, CONT.CAS(C, CONT.CAS(C, SHARMA, SHARMA, CONT.CAS(C, Cont, CONT.CAS(C, CONT.CAS(C, CONT.CAS(C, Cont, Cont, Cont, Cont, Cont, Cont, Cont, Bihar, Cont, Cont, juri, pp, Cont, Cont, Cont, Cont, F.C., AIR2009BOM12Cont, India, India, India, P.C., Cont, Lok Adalat, Cont, Lok Adalat, Cont, Cont, Smt, Bombay, Delhi, Cont, Halsbury, Divorce, Kerala, Bombay, Delhi, Cont, Cont, matters.27, Cont, Harish, Cont, Cont

PERSON: Poonam Mehndiratta, Harshwardhan Pandey, Ankur Mahindro, Shresth Choudhary, Megha Agarwal, Devna, Adhirath, Aarzoo Aneja, Sarvesh, B.K. Srivastava, Rajeev, Katyain, Ashish Virmani, Paridhi Dixit, Ajit Kumar, Nutan Kumari, Ashish Virmani, Paridhi Dixit, versus PRACHI SINGH @, Ajit Kumar, Nutan Kumari, Sunil Mittal, Seema Seth, Dhruv Grover, Poonam Mehndiratta, Harshwardhan Pandey, Amit Grover, Mrinalini Khatri, JAIN, Sashi Panwar, T.Kanniappan, versus INDU JAIN, Parvinder, Nitin Jain, Atul Kharbanda, Jitendra Kumar Jha, Rupam Roy, Akhilesh Aggarwal, MANMOHAN JUDGMENT MANMOHAN, Prashant Mendiratta, Rajat Gupta, Pooja Sharma, Rajesh Pratap Sainani Vs, Bhavna, equity.‖, Mendiratta, Avneesh Sood Vs, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia, Sureshta Devi, E.R., Sureshta Devi v. Om Prakash, Anil Kumar Jain, Mendiratta, Shyam, licet renuntiare, Eleventh Edn, Pramod Gupta, Lrs, Sushil Kumar, Laxminarayan R. Bhattad v. State, Hakimwadi Tenants, Supp, hereinbelow:-"―18, Sunil Mittal, Arun Sharma, Family Law matters.8, Sunil Mittal, Ankur Mahindro, Ranjana Gulati, Ankur Mahindro, Miten S, Goidani, Anr, Nagpur Vs, Sureshta Devi, Sureshta Devi, Ankur Mahindro, Ankur Mahindro, Mansfield, Ankur Mahindro, Rajesh R. Nair Vs, Meera Babu, Sunil Mittal, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia Vs, Gaurav Bhatia, Lok Adalats, a Lok Adalat, Suresta Devi Vs, ―I, ―I am, Haryana, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Deepa Bhatnagar, Maya Jain, SCC415has, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia, suo motu, Benches, Avneesh Sood, Shikha Bhatia, Lal Gupta, Bench, Bench, Bench, Tribhovandas Purshottamdas Thakkar, Ratilal Motilal Patel, AIR1968SC372, SCC, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Bench, Court, Avneesh Sood

ORG: ANNU BHARTI, 483/2016 & C.M., 772/2013 & Ors, 484/2016 & C.M., CDR SITANSHU SINHA ........, 772/2013 & Ors, VIKAS SHARMA Through, 772/2013 & Ors, SWATI BATRA Through, Court, Nos.1147/2016, the Contempt of Courts Act, Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, 772/2013 & Ors, The Family Court, the Courts of Law, the Delhi High Court, Shikha Bhatia Vs, Gaurav Bhatia & Ors, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Courts, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Kapildeo Prasad Sah, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Times Nexvspapers Ltd., Court, impunity‖. Jurisdiction, Court, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, the Supreme Court, Purna Theatre & Ors, the Supreme Court, 772/2013 & Ors, conduct.‖ Union of India Vs, the Supreme Court, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay Vs, the Supreme Court, the civil Court, 772/2013 & Ors, the 59th Report, the Law Commission, Family Courts, the Family Court, Court, Dinesh Gulati Vs, MAT, APP, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Union of India, MhLj, Family Court, 772/2013 & Ors, The Supreme Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Motilal Padampat Sugar Mills Co. Ltd., Uttar Pradesh & Ors, K.V. Janardhanan Vs, N.P. Syamala Kumari & another, 772/2013 & Ors, by"6, Goodright, the House of Lords, Russel, Russel, Parliament, Parliament, the Punjab & Haryana High Court, Usha Devi Vs, Mahinder, Criminal Revision No.2362 of 2008, O&M, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, the Family Court, Dinesh Gulati, Court, the Supreme Court, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr, Cherian Varkey Construction Co., P) Ltd. & Ors, ADR, ADR, ADR, the Legal Services Authorities Act, 772/2013 & Ors, ADR, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, the Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, the Supreme Court, The High Courts, 772/2013 & Ors, the High Courts, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, Hitesh Bhatnagar Vs, The Supreme Court, Anil Kumar Jain Vs, High Court, 772/2013 & Ors, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, the High Courts, the Supreme Court, the Supreme Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. & Anr, Court, Court, supra).28, Court, Dinesh Gulati, Single Judges, Court, Dinesh Gulati, 772/2013 & Ors, Parliament, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, the Supreme Court, Modern Cooperative Group Housing Society Limited and Others, Sub-Committee of Judicial Accountability v. Union of India[(1992, State of Tripura v. Tripura Bar Assn, L&S, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, L&S, Court, Bench, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Shikha Bhatia Cont, 772/2013 & Ors, Court, Dinesh Gulati, Division Bench, MANMOHAN, 772/2013 & Ors

CARDINAL: 1, 42419/2016, 2, 3, 1, 13B(1, 13B(2, 4, 29, 34, 4, 559/2011, 5, 29, two, 6, 29, 48, 7, 1.5, 7, 29, 8, 29, 3, 31, 2, 5, 9, 29, 1, 6, 375 and 376, 8, 10, 29, 12, 8, 5, 11, 29, 12, 29, 2016.10, 55, 27, one, 13, 29, one, 14, 29, 12, 2, 15, 29, 1, 15, 16, 16, 44, one, one, 17, 1014.18, 8, four, 18, 29, 19, 19, 29, 2, 1, 21, 20, 29, 2, 2, one, 2, one, 21, 29, 2, one, 13, 645, 1, 291, 2, 15, 22, 5, 23, 10, 22, 29"29, two, 13, 13, two, 13, 1955.30, 23, two, 1955.25, 13B(1, 13B(1, 13B(1, 24, 29, one, 04.04.2016, 25, 29, one, 22.07.2014.2, two, marriage.3, 22.07.2014, 26, 29, 29, 13, 4, 5, 5, 703, 27, 29, 30, 13B(2, 28, 19 to 28, 29, 29

PERCENT: 29 %

ORDINAL: second, second, first, second, second, second, second, first, second, first, first, second, first, second, first, second, first, Firstly, Secondly, third, first, second, Secondly, 4th, first, second, second, second, second, second, second, second

PRODUCT: No.1, No.1, No.1, Family, merits.4, Bench

NORP: ―For, Hindu, Hindu, Punjab

LOC: 1st Cont

FAC: the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, the Lok Adalat, Sections 13

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //