Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Director Ltd. Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Decided On : Sep-24-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure,, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Chapter VII, Chapter, Section 102, Section 102, Section 102, section 13(a, Act 25 of 2005, the Amendment Act, Section 102, Section 102, the Indian Penal Code, Section 13(2, Section 13(1)(d, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 102(1, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 13, Section 13, Section 102 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 16, Section 2, Section 22, Section 102, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102, Section 102 of the Code, Section 456 of the Code.10, Section 102 of the Code, Page 11, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Page 12, Section 102 of the Code, Section 405, Section 405, Section 102 of the Code, the Criminal Law Amendment Ordinance, Section 14, Article 372 of the Constitution, Chapter, Page 17, section 452, section 453.-, section 453, Page 19, section 453, Section 451, Section 2(g, Section 451, Section 452, Section 452, Section 452, Section 102 of the Code, Section 456, Page 22, Section 457, Section 102 of the Code, Chapter XXXIV, Section 451, Section 102 of the Code, Section 452, Section 102 of the Code, Section 456 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102, Section 451, Section 457, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102, Section 102, Page 28, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102 of the Code, Section 102, Section 102 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, Section 102, Page 34, Section 102, Section 550 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1898, Section 102, Section 83, section 1 of Section 83, section 82, Page 36, Section 102.8, Act 40 of 1993, Section 105A(d, Section 105D, Section 105C, Chapter VIIA, Section 102, Section 452 of the Cr., Section 102

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, SLP, Page 1 of, Special Leave Petition (Criminal) No.1513 of, Nevada Properties Pvt. Ltd., the High Court of Judicature, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 2, the Division Bench, The State of Maharashtra, the Division Bench, Research Education Institute, SLP, Page 3 of 39, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Sections 457, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 4, SLP, Page 5, State, Maharashtra v., Tapas D. Neogy, First Information Reports, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Investigating Officer, the High Courts, SLP, Page 6, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the High Court, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 7, IPC, IPC, Court, Tapas D. Neogy, Tapas D. Neogy, the Delhi High Court, SLP, Jagdish Chander and Others v. State, P.K. Parmar and Others v. Union of India, SLP, The Delhi High Court, Central Bureau of Investigation, CBI, the Government of India, SLP, Page 10, Tapas D. Neogy, Bharat Overseas Bank, Sections 451, the Criminal Court, Bharat Overseas Bank, Court, Tapas D. Neogy, MLW, SLP, Tapas D. Neogy, State of, Court, SLP, Court, U.P. State Electricity Board, Income Tax v. Sun Engineering Works, Court, Tapas D. Neogy, Court, SLP, Page 13, IPC, IPC, Court, IPC, Court, Section Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 14, the Government of India Act, Schedule, IPC, Corporation, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Prevention of Corruption Act, the Central/ State Government, Court, the Central/State Government, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 15, Criminal Court, the Presidential Adaptation of Laws Order, SLP, Page 16, Forfeiture of Property, Sections 451 to 459, Sections 451, Criminal Court, Court, Court, Court, SLP, Criminal Court, Court, Court, Court, the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Appellate Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, SLP, Court, Court, Magistrate, Criminal Court, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, Magistrate, the Criminal Court, Court, SLP, Court, Court, Criminal Court, Court, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 21, Court, the Criminal Courts, the Civil Court, The Criminal Court, the Criminal Court, SLP, the Criminal Court, Court, Magistrate, Criminal Court, a Criminal Court, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 23, Court, SLP, Page 24, Court, Court, the Criminal Court, Sections, the Criminal Court, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 25, P.K. Parmar, Court, the Gujarat High Court, The Gujarat High Court, Court, Court, SLP, Page 26, Legislature, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page 27, Section, the Criminal Court, Sections 451 to 459 of the Code, SLP, Civil Courts, SLP, Page 29, the Criminal Court, SLP, Page, Registry, CJI, SLP, THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL, SLP, CRL, ANR, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Page, Magistrate, Court, Court, Court, Sections 457, SLP, Page 33, the State of Maharashtra, SLP, property151617, No.12275, SLP, Page 35, Reliance, Court, State, Maharashtra, Court, Legislature, Court, SLP, Legislature, Legislature, Court, SLP, Court, Court, the State of Maharashtra, Criminal Appeal, SLP, Legislature, SLP, Page 39

PERSON: DIRECTORS, APPELLANT(S, Singh Khehar, Arun Mishra, Shankar Signapurkar v. State, Shankar Signapurkar, Miscellaneous, Tapas D. Neogy3, Swaran Sabharwal, Pooran Chandra Pandey, Delhi Administration11, Order XXVII, Ordinance, Ordinance, Page, xx xx xx 456.Power, N. Madhavan v. State, Swaran Sabharwal, Jagdish Chander, Teesta Atul Setalvad v. State of Gujarat13, Teesta Atul Setalvad, Ordinance, Binod Kumar, Others, GUPTA, J.(SANJIV KHANNA, JUDGMENT Deepak Gupta, J.1, Sanjiv Khanna, Khanna, immovable property.6, Tapas D. Neogy18, P.C.

DATE: 1482-1485, 2011, November 18, 2014, 2011, November 29, 2010, 1973, 2011, 39, 2133, 2011, 2011, 1978, 2005, 2011, 467, 1860, 1988, 3 (1999, 2011, 1988, 2011, 1930, 4 1988, 2011, 1992, 2011, 2011, 39 9, 1988, 2011, 2018, 2011, 1992, 2011, 1944, 1944, 2011, 39 72, 1935, 1988, 1988, 1908, 2011, 1950, 2011, 2011, two months, 2011, more than one month, 2011, six months, 2011, 2011, 1979, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2018, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2014, 2011, 2011, 39 22, 2019, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 2011, 39 5, more than a century, more than a century, 16 17, 2012, 26.07.2012, 2011, 18 (1999, 2011, 20th July 1994, 2011, 2011, September 24, 2019, 2011

GPE: NOS.891, Special Leave, Bombay, Karnataka, Gauhati, Bombay, P.K., Gujarat, R.K., India, property.-, NEW DELHI, NO.1513, P.C., Cr, India, India, P.C., New Delhi

CARDINAL: 39, at least three, 1, 1, 1 1997, 2, 3, 1, 1, less than, 458, 5, 3, 39, 3, 3, less than, 1, 39, three, 468, 471, 420, 12, 7, 39, 2, 1, 39, 6, 39, 5 40, 199, 39, 452, 453, 456, 457, two, 106, 39, 6, 39, 9, 11, 4, 39, 406, 408, 409, 411, 414, 39, 2, 145, 146, 165, 39, 1985.15, 452, 453, 454, 456, 457, 451, 39, 1, 2, 1, 1, 3, 1, 457, 458, 459, 4, 2, 1, 5, 18, 39, 454.Appeal, 1, 2, 3, 2, 1, 1, 39, 2, 1, 3, 1, 4, 457.Procedure, 1, 2, 16, 20, 451, 451, 5, 39, three, 451, 452, 12, 4, 39, 39, 452, 456, 451, 452, 39, 1, 39, 13, 2, 39, 2, 3, 39, 39, 14, 10, 39, 145, 146, 30, 31, 39, 1482­1485, 32, 39, 1, 2, 3, 1, 1, less than, 458, 1, 1, 3, 39, 1, 7, 39, 1, 1, 37, 39, 38, 39, 39

NORP: Maharashtra, Chapter XXXIV, accused.-, that.12

WORK_OF_ART: S.102 Power of police, Bench

ORDINAL: first, first, first, second, second, first

PRODUCT: Page 8 of, Page 9, Bench

FAC: the Delhi High Court

EVENT: the Second World War

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //