Semantic Analysis by spaCy
Fainul Khan Vs. State of Jharkhand
Decided On : Oct-04-2019
Court : Supreme Court of India
LAW: the Indian Penal Code, Section 147, Section 313, Section 313 Cr, Section 464, Section 147, Section 313, Section 342, the Criminal Procedure Code, Section 313, Section 313, Section 313 Cr, Section 342, the Criminal Procedure Code
ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION, IPC, IPC, IPC, Sections 141, P.W. 7, State, U.P., State of Bihar, State of Assam, State, Reliance, Shobhit Chamar, State of Bihar, State of Bihar, charge.(1, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Prosecutor and Defence Counsel, Court, P.W. 7, State of Bihar, 1995 Suppl, Section 313 CrPC, Bejoy Chand Patra, State of W.B., Court, Court, Section 313 CrPC, State of Rajasthan,1956 SCR288, the High Court, Court, Court
CARDINAL: 937, 938, 1, 147, 01.11.1983, six, four, 146, two, 2, 6 and 8, 6 and 7, 6, 11, 4, 6, 6 and 8, 7 and 8, 3, 8, only one, three, 3, 4, 3, 13, six, Two, 464, 5, six, two, four, one, 6, two, 7, 313, 8, 2, 1, 3, 4, 5, 12, 9, 7 and 8, 10, one, 14, 1, 26, one, 11, 15, 18, eyewitnesses to 12, 24, 16, 35, 13, 17, two, 14, 15
PERSON: KHAN, APPELLANT(S, KHAN, APPELLANT(S, APPELLANT(S, Shri Sidharth Luthra, Fainul Khan, Mir Shaukat, Ranvir Yadav, Samsul Haque, Valerabhai Deganbhai Vagh, Khan, Kisko, Fainul, Appellant Mir Shaukat, Appellant Sainul, Kisko, Fainul Khan, Rabbani Khan, Khan, Eshanul Khan, Mir Sanif, Chandra Bahri, nonexamination, Shankar Singh v. State, Shobhit Chamar, P.C., Sukha, Sukha, Shri Luthra, Fainul, Mir Shaukat, J.[B.R. GAVAI
PERCENT: 939 OF2011MIR SHAUKAT
NORP: J.The, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, P.Ws, Sainul, Nabiul, Sainul, Sainul
TIME: about 06.30 PM
PRODUCT: P.W. 7 and 8, P.W. 8, P.W. 6, P.W. 7, P.W. 11, P.W. 8, P.W. 6, P.W. 8, Mir Shaukat, P.W. 11, P.W. 11, P.W. 7
GPE: P.C., P.Ws, Siddiq, Zabbar, Najabhai, P.C., Cr, Cr, P.C., Cr, P.C.
DATE: 2009, 2019, 1093, 2019, 2017, 1998, 2011, 8, 8, 1st November, 1983, 2019
ORDINAL: first, first
FAC: Mir Tarabul