Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

Krishna Kumar Rawat Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Jul-29-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 269UC, the Income Tax Act, Section 269 UD, Section 269 UD, Chapter XX­C, the Income Tax Act, the Finance Act, Section 269, Chapter XX­C., Section 269 UB, Paras 6, Chapter XX­C, Rule 11, Section 269UD(1, Section 22 269UD(1, Rule 11, Section 269 UD of the Act, the Constitution Bench, Article 136 of the Constitution, Section 269UD(1, Section 269UG, Section 269UG(4

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Kumar Rawat & Ors, VERSUS Union of India & Ors, Respondent(s, No.9901 2010 Union of India & Anr, VERSUS Mithlesh Kumari & Ors, Respondent(s, the High Court of Judicature, D.B. Special Appeal No.744 of, the High Court, D.B. Civil Review Petition No.80, dismissed.2, Smt, M/s Rajasthan Industrial Company, Smt, Smt, Smt, the Income Tax Department, the Jaipur Development Authority on 07.11.1992, A­90 Triveni Nagar, JDA, DAC, Department, Section 269UD, the Central Government, the Income Tax Department, the Central Government, the Central Government, Shri RS Sagar, DVO, Income Tax Department, the Income Tax Department, W.P., the High Court, Income Tax Department, the High Court, the High Court, CJI, The Review Court, C.A. Nos.9800­9801/2010, Court, C.A. No.9901/2010, the Union of India, Income Tax Department, the High Court, Division Bench, intra court, the High Court, Union of India, the High Court, Court, C.B Gautam vs Union of India and Others, the Income Tax Department, CPWD, Vishnu Puri, M/s Rohtas Industries Ltd., CPWD, Tubler, AC, CC, Magistrate, Jaipur Development Authority, Rajasthan Urban, Income Tax Department, Court(Single, Court, Court, Court, Court, intra court, Court, the Appropriate Authority, Reconstruction, Plots) Rules, Appropriate Authority, the Appropriate Authority, the Review Court, Court, Bench, The Review Court, Court, Court, Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Court, C.B. Gautam, Department, Singh Kalha & Ors, Amritsar Improvement Trust & Ors, Union of India & Anr, SCC769 and Executive Engineer, Karnataka Housing Board, Land Acquisition Officer, Gadag & Ors, Court, intra court, Court, C.A. Nos.9800­9801/2010, the High Court of Judicature, Jaipur in Division Bench Special Appeal No.188 of 1995, the appellants(Income Tax Department, the High Court, the Division Bench of High Court, Section 269UG, the Division Bench, inter alia, the High Court, Union of India, the High Court

PERSON: JUDGMENT Abhay, Rajasthan Bench, Godowns, Durgapur, Tahsil Sanganeer, Jaipur, herein, Krishna Kumari Roongta, Krishna Kumari Roongta, Rs.99,84,500/­, notice.12, R­3, meter, meter, Bench, S.M. Jha, Mohammad Rafiq, FDR, R.M. Lodha, Rafiq, S. Ganesh, Shri Mukerjee, C.B Gautam, Nos, Rs.99,84,500/­, Road, Mahavir Nagar, Arjun Nagar, Rs.99,84,500/­, Triveni Nagar, Triveni Nagar, nullah, Jaipur, Lodha, Lal Chand, Rajasthan Bench, FDR, FDR, FDR, FDR, Section 269UG, FDR, J.[DINESH MAHESHWARI

WORK_OF_ART: C.A. Nos.9800­9801/2010 1

DATE: 31.05.2007, 1994, 2007, 31.03.1986, 11.11.1993, 1961, two years, 11.11.1993, 13.04.1994, 14.09.1994, 31.05.2007, 24.07.2007, 1961, 1986, 1993, 13 24, Para 7, 14, 14, 2929, 1980, 1975, 1975, 1995x5242.38=1,04,58,548/­, 21 35, 14.09.1994, 31.05.2007, 1975, 1995, 1,46,58,548/­, 1982, 2009, 2011, 29 49, 2010 1, 31.05.2007, 27.09.1994, 33 7, July 29, 2019 34

GPE: Jaipur, Khasra, Kumari, Kumari, Form No.37, Rs.99,84,568/­., Triveni Nagar, Rs.861.10, Jaipur, Jaipur, p.a., Durgapura, Green Nagar, Rs.99,84,500/­., Ld, Ld, Durgapura, p.a., vendor.2, p.a., New Delhi

CARDINAL: 24.07.2007, 2 4, two, No.3, two, 3 6, 1051/­, two, 11.11.1993.8, 18.01.1994, 4, 21.01.1994, 08.03.1994, 1A, 5, two, 1, 6, 01.04.1991, 7, one, 30.03.1994, 1, 8, 1, 30.03.1994, 30.03.1994, 30.03.1994, 9, 30.03.1994, No.3, 10, 11, three, 30.03.1994, 12, 1, 30.03.1994, three, 16, 5, 14, two, 13, two, two, 15, 7, 6, 16, 7943, Rs.1727.5, 7943, 8, 17, 18 33, 8, 9, 8, 11, 7,943, 5242.38, 1718x1.12, 1994.72, 24.3.94, two, 20, 34, 10, 12, 30.03.1994, 23, 8, 7,943, 5242.38, 5242.38, 1994.72, 5242.38, 1,04,58,548/­., 42, 24, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, 1/3rd, 2/3rd, 41, 25, 26, 27, two, two, two, three, 28, 1, 15, 2, four, 30, 14.09.1994, 31, 4, 4, 32, 4, 4, 6, 4

NORP: Kumari, Rs.42, Rs.42, Rs.99,88,500/­

PERCENT: 5%, 10%, 12%, 40%, 12%, 30% to 40%, 6%, 30% to 40%, 15%, 15%, 30% to 40%, about 6%, 66%, 34%, 34%, about 50%, about 66%, only 66%, 34%, 34%, 15%, 15%, 6%, 6%

ORDINAL: firstly, Second, third, first, second, fourth, first, secondly, First, Second, first

QUANTITY: 116.3 sq. meters, 171 sq. meter, 18 feet, 19 ii

PRODUCT: Section 269UE, CA Nos.9800­9801/2010, appeals.22, Para 3

FAC: Tonk Road, Tonk Road, Tonk Road, Tonk Road, Tonk Road, Tonk Road

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //