Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S Natesan Agencies (Plantations) Vs. State Rep. By the Secretary to Government Environment and Forests Department

Decided On : Aug-20-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Limitation Act, Section 18(1, Section 21 of the Act, Section 21, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 18, Section 18, the Central Act 53 of 1972, Section 11-A of the Act of, Section 24, Section 24, Section 24, Section 48 of the Act of, Section 21, the General Clauses Act, Section 21, section 18, section 18, the Land Acquisition Act, the Limitation Act, article 226 of the Constitution of India, section 18, section 21, the General Clauses Act, Section 80, Section 18(1, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 18(1, Section 18(1, Section 20, Section 18, Section 18, Section 20, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18, Section 18 of the Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 18, Section 60 of the Act of, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Article 72 of the Limitation Act, Article 113 of the Limitation Act, Section 34, Charitable Endowments Act, Section 60 of the Act of, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 60 of the Act of, Section 34, the Tamil Nadu Act, Section 34, the Tamil Nadu Act, Section 34, the Tamil Nadu Act, Section 34, Section 60 of the Act of, Section 60 of the Act, Section 60 of the Act of, Chapter IV of the Act, Chapter IV, Section 18(1, section 18, section 18, section 19, section 21, section 19, section 21, Section 19, section 18, section 19, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 24, section 28, Section 18(1, Section 18(1, Section 27, the Indian Penal Code, Section 18, Section 20 of the Act of, Section 18, Section 26-A, Section 18, Section 26-A, section 18, Chapter IV, Section 19, Section 18, Section 25-A, Sections 19 to 25, Section 18, Section 26-A, Section 29, Section 18, Section 20, Section 18(1, Section 18(1, Section 18(1, Section 27 of the Act of, Section 27, Article 72 of the Limitation Act, Article 72 of the Limitation Act, Article 72, Article 72, Article 113, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 34, Section 34, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, Section 14, the Limitation Act, the Limitation Act, Section 14, Section 14, the Limitation Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, land1, the Government of Tamil Nadu, the Wild Life (Protection, the High Court, 805/1, 805/3, 807,808 & 809, No.495, Mutt, the High Court, Mutt, the State Government, the High Court, the High Court, Mutt, the Government of Tamil Nadu, Kalakkadu Reserve Forest, the District Collector, the District Collector, the Wild Life Protection, Mutt, Mutt, the District Collector, Mutt, Cardamom Estate, the Commissioner of Land Administration, Mutt, Government, Mutt, W.P. No.685, the High Court, inter alia, the State Government, the High Court, inter alia, Mutt, the Collector under Sections 9(3, Mutt, p.a., W.P. No.6931 of, Mutt, the High Court, the High Court, Land Administration, the High Court, Land Administration, Collector’s Office, K2/1498/83, the Special Administration, the District Collector Tirunelveli, Court, Collector, the High Court, Forest Department, Mutt, the High Court, W.P. No.21721, the High Court, the High Court, WA No.1041 of, the Division Bench, the High Court, the Division Bench, the High Court, Mutt, Government, Government, Mutt, the Court of law, Mutt, the High Court, the High Court, Government, Government, Government, Court, Commissioner of Land Administration, Government, Special Leave to Appeal, Court, Special Leave to Appeal, Court, Mutt, Mutt, Government, the State Government, Wild Life Protection Act, Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Mutt, the High Court, Mutt, the Division Bench, the High Court, the High Court, the Division Bench of High Court, Repairs to Factory/Office, Government, Collector, the Forest Department, Forest Department, Mutt, Court, the Trial Court, Hereinafter, High Court, OSA, the High Court, OSA, C.M.P. No.8947 of, the Division Bench, the High Court, inter alia, State, Government, State, Rs.2,31,000/-, the High Court, State, Division Bench, Government, State, State, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, the High Court, the Government in Forest and Fisheries Department, SCC673, Standard Chartered Bank, Andhra Bank Financial Services Ltd. & Ors, the Division Bench, the State Government, Union of India, Court, U.P., State, State of A.P., Union of India v. Sancheti Food Products Ltd., the Division Bench, Tonk & Ors, Union of India v. Shring Construction Co., the Division Bench, State, A.P., Challa Ramkrishna Reddy & Ors, Mutt, Mutt, State, State, State, Mutt, the High Court, State, Court, Mutt, State, the Central Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the State Government, the High Court, The State Government, The State Government, the State Government, State, the State Government, the State Government, the State Government, Collectors, State, Mutt, Mutt, Mutt, State, Mutt, the Division Bench, the High Court, Mutt, the High Court, the Division Bench, State, Standard Chartered Bank, the High Court, State, the High Court, Challa Ramkrishna Reddy, Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Division Bench of High Court, the applicability of Section 14, Court, Court, Ors, v. Board of Revenue, U.P., Ors.:1984, Supp, Court, Court, Court, the Official Receiver, the Official Assignee, Division Bench, the Nagpur High Court, The New Akot Cotton Ginning, the High Court, S. 14, Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Shring Construction Co., Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Mutt, State, State, Mutt, the Division Bench, the High Court, State

PERSON: APPELLANT(S, C.M.P. No.8947, Sri Nanamamalai, Nanguneri Taluk, Mutt, Tamil Nadu, Mutt, Wildlife Warden, No.377 EDF, Mutt, Labour Sheds, Exhibits P-1, Nos, Nos, No.7, Nos, Ex, John v. Returning Officer & Ors, Hari Krishan Khosla, Supp, Lal v. State, N. Nagendra Rao & Co., Rameshwar Lal v. Municipal Council, limitation.10, Kasturi Lal’s, Yeshwant Deorao, Forest Officer, Wild Life Warden, permit.-, Wildlife Warden, Sushil Kumar, Madhavrao Narayanarao Patwardhan v. Ramkrishna, Zafar Khan, Yeshwant Deorao, Kashinath Shankarappa, Rameshwarlal, J.(DINESH MAHESHWARI

CARDINAL: 1, 26.02.2007, 193, 178, 1.1, 1, 806, 2, 3, 2, 19.11.1993, 18.09.1997, 86,88,000/-, 3, 2, 2.1, 15.11.1971, 30.06.1977, 2.2, 2.3, 4, 2.4, 14.07.1977, 2.5, 14.07.1977, 4, 5 2.6, 28.08.1978, 31.08.1978, 2.7, 6, 72,98,661/-, 65,06,453/-, 2.8, 5, 7 2.9, 2.10, 10, 1,09,60,000/-, 96,400/-, 8, 2.12, 11.08.1993, 25.08.1993, 26.10.1993, 2.13, 19.11.1993, 2, 6, 11.08.1993, 10.7.92, 2.14, 17.11.1993, 2, 19.11.1993, 2.15, 10, 19.11.1993, 1,000/-, 18.09.1997, 2.16, 18.09.1997, 18.09.1997, 2.16.1, 18.09.1997, 2, 11, 2.16.2, 8, 2.16.3, 20, 9The, 23, 17.10.1993, 18.09.1997, 2.18, 2.19, two, 14, 19.11.1993, 18.09.1997, 3, 15, 2.31, 16, 50.82, 70.13, 7.00, 1.00, 3.00, 1,31,95,000/-, 4, 4.1, 4.2, 18, 18.09.1997, 1, 8.6, 10, 19, 7, 1 and 3, No.2, 18.09.1997, No.2, 7.2, 4, 5, 20, 2.31, 50.82, 1, 51.82, 35.06, 18.09.1997, 4, 5, 8, 21, 8.1, two, 1, 2, 22, 24, two, 23, 27, 8.2, 18.09.1997, 24, 28, 8.3, 25, 29, 8.4, 26, 3, 8, 6, 27 9.1, 2, 28 9.2, 9.3, 6, 15, 29, 18.09.1997, 18.09.1997, 6, 8, 10.1, 11, 10.2, 10.3., 32, 11, 33, 20.03.1978, 12, 34, 34, 13, 60, 1, 2, 35, three, two, 28.08.1978, 28, 1, 14, 15, 02.10.1991, 1, 37, 19, 38, 24, 1, 2, 1, 1894).17, 27, 1, 39, 2, 40, 1, 2, 15.1, 3, 4, 3, 4, 41, 1, 20, 18, 3, 42 16, 21, 43, 16.1, 17, 44, 18.09.1997, 17.1, 2, 17.2, one, one, 21, 47, 21.1, 48, 21.3, No.2, 21.4, one, one, 49, 1, 14, 6, 1, 2, 3, 4, 13, two, 5, two, 255, 51, 28, 163(1, three, 52, 21.5, 21.6, 54, 18.09.1997, 21.7, 18.09.1997, 55, 18.09.1997, 56, 1, 57

GPE: O.S.A. Nos, C.S., Kalakkadu Village, Malayadipudur Village, Tirunelveli District, Tirunelveli District, Tamil, 05.03.1991, p.a., W.P. No.21721, p.a., p.a., Kasturi, Sections, Thiru John, Single, New Delhi

DATE: 2002, 2003, 2006, 15.10.2001, 1998, 5 years in the years 1971-1972, 25 years in the years 1977-1978, 06.03.1976, 19723, 805/4, 1972, 13.09.1995, 15.10.2001, 26.02.2007, a period of 5 years i.e., 1972, 23.03.1975, 17.09.1976, 16.11.1976, 14.07.1977, 1972, 19754, 30.06.1977, 20.03.1978, 25 years, 01.07.1977 to 30.06.2002, a little later, two months, 1975, 14.07.1977, the year 1978, 1975, 01.08.1985, 23.03.1990, 03.12.1990, 18945, 1991, 13.07.1991, 1894, 20.01.1992, 09.03.1992, 1894, 30.03.1992, 16.04.1992, 1993, 11.08.1993, four weeks, order6, six weeks, 20.6.1990, 12.9.1990, 19.10.1992, the 1st, four weeks, 1972, 12.11.1993, 12.11.1993, 1972, 1993, 13.09.1995, 1995, 1972, 18977, 12.11.1993, 13 2.17, 23.02.1998., 23.02.1998, 06.03.1976, 1993, 1995, 13.09.1995, 18.09.1997, 08.06.1998, the first day, the year 1976, the year 1993, the year 1993, 18.09.1997, a period of 3 years, 22 years, 22 years, 22 years, 22 years, 3 years, three years, 3 years, 1972, 17 17.11.1993, 196310, 06.03.1976, 15.10.2001. 7.1, 06.03.1976, 28.05.1987, 1972 to 1978, 23.03.1990, 03.12.1990, 22 years i.e., 2002, 2003, 2006, 26.02.2007, 1972, 25 years, five years, 25 years, 25 years, 1976, 28.5.1987, the year 1987, 22 years, No.6., 26.02.2007, 1972, 28.05.1987, the years 1972 to 1978, 1977, 2003, 2006, 1972, more than two decades, annual, 1993, 1972, 1994, 2015, 1996, 2006, one year, 2000, three years, damages 30, 195911, 25 years, 1972, 1972, 22 years, 1959, 1972, 25 years, 195912, 5 years, 1959, 1959, five years, five years, five years, five years, 1959, 197213, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972, 1972, 27, 1972, 2003, 1991, two months, 16Section 19, 1971, 1894, 1991, 1991, 1972, 18, 1991, 1860, 45 of 1860, 1972, 2003, sixty days, two years, 1972, a period of 5 years, 30.06.1977, 06.03.1976, 30.06.1977, 20.03.1978, 06.03.1976, 20.03.1978, 26.02.2007, 1972, 45, 16.11.1976, 22 years, 28.05.1987, 28.05.1987, 1972, one year, One year, one year, three years, 08.06.1998, 18.09.1997, S. 162, 1996, 1996, 1996, 1972, 13.09.1995, the year 1998, 18.09.1997, 16.11.1976, more than 20 years later, 24, August, 2019

PRODUCT: Single 1, P-42, P-17, Bench

QUANTITY: 197.36 acres - Hereinafter, 197.36 acres, 80 acres, 197.36 acres, 10 acres, 197.36 acres, the 80 acres, 197.36 acres, 148.55 acres, 75.52 acres, 10 acres, 10 acres

PERCENT: 18%, 9%, 30%, 12%, 15%, 18%, 6%, 9%

LOC: Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge, Single Judge, Single, Single Judge

TIME: 24.06.1984, 9 the Act, under this Act, under this Act, 18. Declaration

ORDINAL: fourth, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, first, first, second, second, second, first, second, second, second, Secondly, second, second, second, second, second, first, first, first

NORP: Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli, Tirunelveli

WORK_OF_ART: Rakesh Kumar, Closed Areas".14, The Collector

FAC: the Tamil Nadu Hindu Religious and, the Tamil Nadu Act, the Tamil Nadu Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //