Rajasthan High Court Jodhpur Vs. Neetu Harsh

Decided On : Aug-29-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Page 1 of 23, The Page 3, the PWD Act, Page 12, Section 36, Section 36 of the PWD Act, Section 36, the PWD Act, section 33, Article 233, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, Article 233, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, Section 33, the PWD Act, the PWD Act, the PWD Act, Constitution, Section 36, the PWD Act, Article 233, Article 309 of the Constitution of India, Page 22

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, SLP, Rajasthan High Court, Jodhpur & Anr, Appellant(s, Respondent(s, the High Court of Judicature, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Examination, the High Court, the General Category, Differently, Differently, Differently, The High Court, Differently, the High Court, Page 4, the High Court, the Persons with Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, the High Court, Judicial, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, Differently Abled Persons, A. Disabilities (Equal Opportunities, Locomotor Disability, Cerebral Palsy, Aforesaid, Cerebral Palsy, L.D. & C.P, non­availability of fit, Rajasthan Judicial Services Rules, B. Examination, General Category Candidate, the Roll No.5046, Persons with Disabilities, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, Page 10, Sections 2, the Recruitment Notification, the Recruitment Notification, Government of India, Union of India & Anr, National Federation of the Blind, Rajeev Kumar Gupta & Ors, Union of India & Ors, Court, Government, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, Differently, Vacancies, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, the High Court of Judicature, the Rajasthan Judicial Service, Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, the Rajasthan Employment of Disabled Persons Rules, State of, Tamil Nadu & Ors, Court, the Tamil Nadu Judicial Service, Court, Court, the Tamil Nadu State Judicial Service, Cadre and Recruitment) Rules, the Rajasthan Rules, Court, J&K Public Service Commission, Registrars General, Calcutta High Court, Shriniwas Prasad Shah & Ors, Court, Hemiplegia, Hemiplegia, Page 21, Hemiplegia, Court, the High Court, the Rajasthan Judicial Service Rules, the High Court

DATE: 2017, 2017, 2016, the year 2013, 1995, 2016, 70, 2011, 2010, 15.11.2016, the previous year, 2010, the subsequent year, 1995, 18 to 32, 33, 36, 2010, 2013, 2016, the year 2016, the earlier years, the earlier year, 2010, the year 2016, 1995, year, that year, 2010, 18.01.2010, January 18, 2010 G.S.R.81.­, 2000, a particular year, the subsequent year, 2019, 1995, 1995, 2007, 1995, 2010, 1995, 2010, 2005, para 5, 2013, 23 17, 28.11.2016, 2010, August 29, 2019

PERSON: Versus Neetu Harsh & Anr, Nos, Cadre, Cadre, Renu Motwani, Meenakshi Arora, Pallav Shishodia, Cadre, Rajasthan, Mobility, Mobility, Rajasthan, & Anr, Rani Prakash Gupta, Notification, Rule 10(4, NOTIFICATION Jaipur, Rajasthan, V. Surendra Mohan, Notification, 05.07.2010, Israr Ahmad, A.S. BOPANNA

GPE: A.S., Jodhpur, Civil, O.L., O.A., States, therein.10, justified.12, Rajasthan, India, Rs.50/­., .J.New Delhi

CARDINAL: 2, 3, two, 72, two, 2, 23, 15.11.2016, two, one, 28.11.2016, 23, two, only one, 23, 5, 23, 12.03.2016, 6, 37, 11, 11, 3, 8, 2, 14, 4, 2, 70, 2, 2, 3, One, One, 7, 23, 5, 5, 7, 2.4, 8, 23, 3.1, 28.11.2016, 9, 23, only one, 23, 11, 23, 7, 10, 13, 23, 12.03.2016, one, one, 13, 23, three, three, 14, 23, 13, 234, 234, 10(4, 1, 15, 23, 2, 3, 4, 14, 16, 23, 17, 23, 10(4, 234, 2.4, 18, 23, 12, 19, 23, 12, 20, 23, 23, 23, 23

PRODUCT: Notification, Notification

MONEY: 136 marks, 138 marks

PERCENT: 80%, 80%, more than 80%, 3%, 50%, 40 to 50 %, 70 %, 40 to 50 %, more than 80%

WORK_OF_ART: Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons, Differently Abled Persons

NORP: amended).6, Candidates

ORDINAL: second, first

TIME: 05.07.2010