Ramesh Nivrutti Bhagwat Vs. Surendra Manohar Parakhe

Decided On : Oct-04-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 137, the Indian Succession Act, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 137, the Limitation Act, the Indian Succession Act, Section 228 ­ Administration, Chapter VII, Chapter an inventory or, The Indian Succession Act, Article 137 of the Act, Article 137, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 181 of the Limitation Act, Article 137, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 137, the Civil Procedure Code, Article 137, Article 137 of the 1963 Limitation Act, Article 137 of the 1963 Limitation Act, the Code of Civil Procedure, Article 137, Section 228, Article 137, Section 228, Article 137 of the Limitation Act, Article 137

CARDINAL: 1, 2 2, 24.6.1977, 3, 24.11.1994.4, 29.03.1997, 5, 228, 271, 6, 1, 21.7.1999, 29.3.1997, 1.4.1998, 25.11.1994, 21.7.1999, 8 8, 24.06.1977, 9 10, 1, 10, 11, 237, 238, 239, 12, 2, 3, 12, 37, 8, 1 SCR996which, 5, 14, 15, 16, 16, 1, 09.09.1965, 27.10.1965, 17, 09.09.1965, 17, 25.11.1994, 29.03.1997, 29.7.1999, 25.11.1994

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, the Bombay High Court, LOA, Antoinette, the Superior Court of the State of California for Los Angeles County, the Bombay High Court, the State of Maharashtra, the High Court, Antoinette, Rural Gospel and Medical Mission of India, the High Court, LOA, Court, the Bhagwant Mukti Ashram, the Superior Court of California, LOA, the Superior Court of California, LOA, The Superior Court of California, the Bombay High Court, Rukminidevi, Court, State, Court, Court, Court, State, State, Time, Kirandeep Kaur & Ors, State Electricity Board, Kerala State Electricity Board, Sections 4, Court, Athani Municipal Council, Kerala Electricity Board, Court, the High Court, Court, Magistrate South, Court, Kunvarjeet Singh Khandpur, a Competent Court, Court, Court, The High Court, SARAN

PERSON: OF2010RAMESH NIVRUTTI BHAGWAT, JUDGMENT S. RAVINDRA BHAT, Antoinette Bendre Bhagwat, Antoinette, Balaji Balwant Bhagwat, Balaji, Antoinette, Balaji, Dinkar Sambhaji Patole, Surendra Manohar Parakhe, Nivrutti Bhagwat, Balaji, Balaji, Balaji, John Graf Klotzle, Carl Kinsinger, Narendra Lal Gupta, Ramesh, Balaji, Will, ­­­­­­ ­­­­­ Section 263 ­ Revocation, Will, Will, Will, Will, T.P. Kunhaliumma, ­­­­­­ ­­­­­, Kunvarjeet Singh Khadapur, Gertie Mathias, Will, Will, S. RAVINDRA BHAT, J.New Delhi

PRODUCT: VS, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant, Appellant

NORP: J.1, Ashram, Delegate, Indian

WORK_OF_ART: Antoinette, 24.6.1977, Patole

GPE: California, US, US, Los Angeles County, California, U.S.A., California, California, India, ­­­­­, District Judges, Trivandrum, New Delhi

DATE: 26.2.1981.3, 02.11.1982, 1982, 1997, 01.04.1998, 4 29.07.1999.5, six months, one year, three years, 1925, 1985, 7 25.11.1994, 1963, 3 years, the period of, three years, the three year, 24.11.1997, the period of seven months, two days, 1963, 1925, 1925, 13 Three years, 2008, 1977, 1963, 1908, 1908, 1908, 1963, 1963, 22, 2019, 2018, three years, three years, the year 25.01.1996 i.e., a good 31 years, 31 years, 01.04.1998, 18, October 04, 2019

EVENT: another Petition No.912/ 97, Limitation Act

LANGUAGE: English

LOC: the District Judge

FAC: Kunvarjeet Singh Khandpur v., Kunvarjeet Singh Khandpur, Sameer Kapoor, Sameer Kapoor, Lynette Fernandes v.

MONEY: 14 Limitation Act

ORDINAL: third, firstly, first