Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

North Western Railway General Manager Vs. M/S Bharat Spun Pipes and Construction Company.

Decided On : Mar-29-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 11(6, the Amendment Act, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 12(5, the Amendment Act, Section 11(6, the Amendment Act, Section 12, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, Section 21, Section 26 of the Amendment Act, Section 12(5, the Amendment Act, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 12(5, the Amendment Act, Section 11(6, Section 12(5, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, the Amendment Act, the “No Claim, Section 11(6, the Amendment Act, Section 1(2, the Amendment Act, Section 21 of the Act, Section 26 of Amendment Act, Section 21, Section 21, Section 26, the Amendment Act, Section 21, Section 21, Section 26 of Amendment Act, Section 26 of the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, the Amendment Act, Section 26, the Amended Act, Section 21, the Amendment Act, Section 26 of the Act, the Amendment Act, the Amendment Act, the Amended Act, the Amendment Act, Section 21, the Principal Act, the 25 Amendment Act, Section 21, the Amendment Act, Section 11(6, Section 11, Section 11 of Act, Section 11, Section 11 of Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11, the Arbitration Act, Section 11, Section 11, Section 11(6, Act 46, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6, Section 11(6

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION REPORTABLE CIVIL APPEAL, UNION OF INDIA, Respondent(s, the High Court, Arbitration, the High Court, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, The High Court, GCC, the High Court, GCC, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Additional Solicitor General, GCC, Court, S.P. Singla Constructions Pvt, State of Himachal Pradesh and Others, the High Court, Union of India, SCC349 New India Assurance Company Limited Vs, Genus Power Infrastructure Ltd., ANS Constructions Limited, Court, Union of India & Another Vs, SCC504 Union of India & Another Vs, V.S. Engineering(P) Ltd., SCC240 Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, Patel Engineering Co. Limited, SCC240 Union of India Vs, Singh Builders Syndicate 2009(4, GCC, the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, GCC, Court, S.P. Singla Constructions Pvt. Ltd’s, Court, National Insurance Company Limited Vs, Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, Court, non­suit, Court, Court, Datar Switchgears Ltd., Tata Finance Ltd., Punj Lloyd Ltd., MHB Ltd., Union of India Vs, Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co., GCC, Court, Court, Union of India, Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Corporation Limited, the Arbitral Tribunal, Parliament, the High Court, the High Court, GCC, the High Court, Engineer, Engineer, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, Conditions, Railway, Arbitration, the Arbitral Tribunal, Railway, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Division of the Railway, Tribunal, Obligation During Pendency Of Arbitration, Engineer, Arbitral Tribunal, Arbitral Tribunal, Railway, GM, Authority, Railway Board’s, Arbitral Tribunal, Railway Officer, Railway, Gazetted Railway Officers, Railway, Railway Officer(s, Railway Arbitrator, GM, Railway, GM, Arbitral Tribunal, the Accounts Department, Selection Grade of the Accounts Department, SA, Arbitration, the Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, Court, Aravali Power Company Private Limited Vs, Clauses, S.P. Singla Constructions Pvt, the Delhi High Court, Ratna Infrastructure Projects, the Arbitration and Conciliation (Amendment) Act, agree.27, Court, Union of India Vs, Kishorilal Gupta & Bros., P.K. Ramaiah & Co., National Thermal Power Corpn, Maharashtra Vs, Damodar Valley Corporation Vs, SCC141 Bharat Heavy Electricals Limited Ranipur Vs, SCC625 Union of India, New India Assurance Co. Ltd., NTPC Ltd., Reshmi Constructions Builders & Contractors, Court, Court, Court, National Insurance Company Limited Vs, Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, Court, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, National Insurance Company Limited Vs, Boghara Polyfab Private Limited(supra, 6312/2018 Parmar Construction Company 2, S.K. Construction of Nature of Work under Contract Claim of Contractor Construction, Nadbhai-Idgah, Arbitration Cost, Rs 2.65 Lacs (Escalation, Maya Construction Pvt Ltd, Pipes Construction Company Total, Diesel Shed, Bhagat-ki-kothi, RRI Building, S&T Structures, Rs 3.5 Lacs & Rs 26,12,977,14/- Construction of Ratangarh Bye Pass, Dausa Yard, Final, Bank Guarantee, Security Deposit, & Final, Harsha Constructions Construction, Bharat Spun Pipes & Construction Company, Contract Rs 6,31,07,472.50/- Construction, XXV, Lacs, PSC, Bharat Spun Pipes & Construction Company 11, Contract Rs 2,98,59,531/- Construction, AEN Office, Signalling, Pipes & Construction Company 13, B.M. Construction Company, Idgah-Agra Fort Station Yard, Total Rs 27,86,343/- Construction, Steel, Labour Cess, Balaji Builders & Developers Construction of, Units, B.M. Construction Company, Kewai Constructions Co (JV) Construction of, Dausa, Steel, Labour Cess, PSC Slab Advances, Total Cost of Contract Rs, Court, National Insurance 37 Company Limited Vs, Boghara Polyfab Private Limited(supra, Union of India, New India Assurance Company Limited Vs, Genus Power Infrastructure Limited, ANS Constructions Limited, Court, National 38 Insurance Company Limited Vs, Boghara Polyfab Private Limited, Court, the High Court, Court, Court, Union of India & Another Vs, Court, the High Court, the High Court, this Court in Union of India, V.S. Engineering(P) Ltd., Additional Solicitor General, Union of India, the General Conditions of Contract, Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the General Conditions of Contract, the High Court, the High Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Union of India v., the Arbitral Tribunal for the Railways, the General Conditions of Contract, Court, this 42 Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the General Conditions of Contract, the Chief Justice of, the High Court, Court, Northern Railway Administration, Ministry of Railway, Patel Engineering Company Limited(supra, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Union of India Vs, the High Court, Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Union of India, Court, Ministry of Railway v. Patel Engg., the Arbitral Tribunal, Court, Datar Switchgears Ltd. case(supra, Union of India Vs, Bharat Battery Manufacturing Co., Court, the Arbitral Tribunal, Tripple Engineering Works, GCC, Court, Court, the High Court, this Court in Union of India and Others Vs, Uttar Pradesh State Bridge Corporation Ltd., Arbitral Tribunal, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court

CARDINAL: 3303, 6312, 3304, 3310, 3311, 8021, 1, 3305, 7937, 3319, 3309, 8598, 22263, 2 2, 1, 2, 3, 3 3, 2018.4, 58.60, 55.54, 4, one, 64(3, 5 6, 6 7, 2015).8, 1, 5, 64(3, 2018(15, 8, 2011(12, 2015(2, 2018(3, 9, 11, 10, 64(7, 11, 2009(1, 12, 2006(2, 13, 16, 14, 1996.17, 15, 64(3, 2015.19, 16, 43.(2, 64.(1, 1, 64.(1, 17 64.(1, 64.(1, 64.(1, 64.(2, 64.(3, 18, 25,00,000, twenty five, 22.10./05.11.2013, 64.(3, three, 2, more than 3, one, at least 2, at least one, 3, one, 19, 64(3, 20, 64(3)(a)(i, 21 23, 22, 21, 25, 22, 1, 22.1.1, one, 22.1.2, 6, 6, 6, 6, 22.2, 24, 16, 23.10.2015, 26, 2015.28, 26, 1974(1, 27, two, one, 44, three, three, 28, 31, 51, 51, 29, 52, 52, ten, six, six, 30, 33, 31, 1, 1,07,98,765/-, 4, 6034/201 8, 6316/201 8, 55.54, 3, 8, 30,08,389/-, 7.9, 12,60,000/-, 17,78,231/-, 1,06,69,165/- Rs 1,88,709/-, 8596/201, 8.9, 1,17,65,739/-, 10,30,081/-, 16,48,383/-, 28,085, 70,94,237/- 10, 8.8, 5, 9514/201 8, 1.5, 13.8, 1.28, 20Lacs, 72, 108, 36, 22263/20, 18, 11417/20, 18, 18, 39,05,010/-, 21, 20Lacs, 13.85, 36, 52(iii, three, 6, 6, 39, two, 6, 40, 8), three, 64, two, 3, 64, 64, 3)(a)(ii, Two, 5,00,000, five, 41, two, 4, two, two, two, 40, 3, 64, 10, 64, two, 63, 64, 64, three, 505, 4, two, two, two, 5, three, 6, 43, 8), 11, 64.12, 10, 44, 10, 10, 8), 41, 45, one, one, 64(3)(a)(ii, 47, 64(3

DATE: 6034 of 2018, 2166 of 2018, 3307, 6316, 2018, 3312, 7720, 8019 of 2018, 3308, 2018, 8596 of 2018, 9514 of 2018, 3313, 3315, 9559 of 2018, 3317, 11417 of 2018, 3318, 11862 of 2018, 3316, 2015, 23rd October, 2015, 2015, 1996, 21st December, 2011, 31st March, 2013, 23rd December, 2013, 1996, 1996, 2015, 2015, 2015, October, 2015, 23rd October, 7 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 1996, 2015, 1996, SCC373 10, 1996, 2015, 2015, 1996, 2015, 1996, 23rd October, 2015, 2015, 23rd October, Monthly, every month, the preceding month, 120 days, 120 days, 180 days, the day, a period of, 30 days, 60 days, a period of, 90 days, 60 days, the day, 60 days, the day, 30 days, 30 days, 1996, 1st January, 2016, 2015, 2015, 23rd October 2015, 1996, 2015, 1996, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2015, 2013, 2015, 23rd October, 2015, 1996, 2015, 2015, 2015, 1996, 1996, 2015, 23rd October, 1994, 1995, 1988(3, SCC663 30, 32, Only a few days, 2166/2018, 32 3, 10,25,095/- 33 7, 8019/2018, + 36, 7720/2018, 8598/2018, 34 12, 14, 35 15, 5,98,22,476/- 17, 9 months, 13,66,488/-(Price, 47,66,869/-, 10Lacs, 35, 2015, 1996, 3)(a)(iii, 30 days, today, three months, 63, 2004, 30 days, today, three months, 1940, 2004, 2008, 30 days, 30 days, the year 1996, two decades, 1996, 48, one month, today, four weeks, 49 46, March 29, 2019 50

WORK_OF_ART: Diary No.8885/2018) CIVIL APPEAL, No Due Certificate, No Claim" Certificate

PERSON: JUDGMENT Rastogi, Designate, Rajasthan, K.M. Natarajan, Scale 421.9, Anr, M.P. Gupta 2004(10, Sameer Jain, Headquarters, No.2012, SAG Officer, Supp(3, SCC324, KK Kar, Amarnath Bhan Prakash, Anr, L.K. Ahuja, SCC76 Jayesh Engineering, Designate, Rs 2.96, Rs 2.39 Lacs, Bridge, Bridges, Rs 1, Kanauta- Jaipur, Rs 1.25Lacs, Jatwara- Kanauta, Construction Company(supra, Anr, M.P. Gupta(supra, P.K. Bahri, P.K. Bahri, M.P. Gupta, Bench, P.K. Bahri, P.K. Bahri, Desai, Singh Builders Syndicate(supra, M.P. Gupta, Punj Lloyd case(supra, Designate, parties.44, J.(A.M. KHANWILKAR

ORDINAL: third, 7th, Fifth, first, 43(2, first, second, first, 10th, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first, first

GPE: Dungarpur, the State of Rajasthan, New Delhi Vs, Panel, MD, S.N, Dungarpur, p.a., Jodhpur, p.a., Profit, India, New Delhi Vs, NEW DELHI

PERCENT: 18%, 18%, 18%, 1%, 10%

LOC: North Eastern Railway, Banas River, Northern Railway, North Eastern Railway, North Eastern Railway

FAC: Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, Railway, the Lok Adalat, Bharatpur-Agra Fort Station Yard, Railway, Getore Jagatpur Railway Station

EVENT: Clause 63, Clause 64

PRODUCT: JA Grade, JA Grade, JA Grade, Clause.20, Prasad Bansal 5.6, Total Rs

TIME: 1996 Act, 1996 Act

NORP: Extra

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //