Bajaj Auto Limited Vs. Union of India

Decided On : Mar-27-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: the Central Excise Act, Section 5A, section 3, the Additional Duties of Excise (Goods of Special Importance, section 3, the Additional Duties of Excise (Textiles and Textiles Articles, the Second Schedule of the Central Excise Tariff Act, Section 136, the Central Excise Act, the Finance Act, the Finance Act, Article 226 of the Constitution of India, Section 91, Section 93, Section 93, Section 93, Section 136 of the Finance Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, Versus UNION OF INDIA & ORS, National Calamity Contingent Duty, Education Cess, Central Excise Duty, Himachal Pradesh, the Government of India, Uttaranchal, Uttarakhand, the State of Uttaranchal, the State of Himachal Pradesh, Industrial Units, Growth Centres, Industrial Infrastructure Development Centres, Industrial Estates, Theme Parks (, Software, the Central Government, Himachal Pradesh, the Central Board of Excise & Customs, the Industrial Growth Centre or, Industrial Infrastructure Development Centre or, the Central Government, the Industrial Growth Centre or, Industrial Infrastructure Development Centre or, NCCD, Education Cess, NCCD, the National Calamity Contingent, the National Calamity, The National Calamity, the National Calamity, the Education Cess, Secondary & Higher Education Cess, the Education Cess, the Superintendent (Audit, NCCD, Education Cess and, Department, the High Court of Uttarakhand, SRD Nutrients Pvt. Ltd., Central Excise, the Education Cess, the Secondary & Higher Education Cess, Department, Department, Meghalaya, Education Cess, Court, Court, Department, Education Cess and, Circular, Department, Member (, Customs, Court, the Ministry of Finance, Sections 91 to 93 of the Finance, the First Schedule, the Central Government, the Rajasthan High Court, Banswara Syntex Ltd., Union of India2, ELT169, Court, the Rajasthan High Court, SRD Nutrients Pvt, NCCD, NCCD, inter alia, Department, Court, NCCD, NCCD, Department, NCCD, Novopan India Ltd., Hyderabad, CCE, Customs, Court, Union of India v. Wood Papers 4, NCCD, Education Cess, SRD Nutrients Pvt, NCCD, NCCD, SRD Nutrients Pvt, Education Cess, Court, SRD Nutrients Pvt, the Rajasthan High Court, Banswara Syntex Ltd.10, NCCD, NCCD, NCCD, NCCD, NCCD, Education Cess

DATE: 2019, 2017, 1944, 1944, March, 2002, 7.1.2003, a period of, 10 years, five years, five years, June 10, 2003, 1944, 1944, 1957, 58 of 1957, 1978, 40 of 1978, 1985, 1986, the year 2007, 2001, 1944, 1944, 2004, 2007, 13.10.2011, 6 12, 2004, 2007, 2018, 14, 2004, 1985, 1944, 1944, 2 2007, 2007, 16, 2001, 5 1994, 1990, ten years, March 27, 2019

PERSON: JUDGMENT, KISHAN KAUL, Para 3.1, Parks, Schedule, Mukul Rohatgi, Arvind Datar, Nisha Bagchi, Supp, Nageswara Rao, Kishan Kaul

NORP: J.1, Central Excise, Central

CARDINAL: 2, 1, 3.1, 2, 4, 1, 1, 3, 3, 5, 3, 5, two, 1985.7, 27/28.2.2009, three, three, 4, 1, 2, 3, 9, 91, 136, 5 10, three, 27.2.2009, 26.8.2011, 16.3.2017, 1, 1, 10.8.2004, 2, 21, 22, 8, 3, 15, 15, three, three, 216, 1, 2, 3, 24, two, one, two, two, 3, 10, one, 3, three, one, 4, 8, 9, 10, 12, 13, 26.8.2011, 14

GPE: the States of Uttarakhand, India, Uttarakhand, Uttarakhand, Mizoram, Manipur, Nagaland, States, D.O., NCCD.22, unit.23, New Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: New Industrial Policy

PERCENT: 100%, 100%, 30%, 25%, 2%, 2%, 2%

PRODUCT: Annexure-II

ORDINAL: Seventh

LOC: Single Judge, the North-Eastern States of Assam

MONEY: two per cent, No.2) Act