Employees State Insurance Corporation Thr. Regional Directors Vs. Venus Alloy Pvt. Ltd. Thr. Managaing Director

Decided On : Feb-05-2019

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 2, the ESI Act, Section 75, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, Section 82, Section 2, the ESI Act, Section 2(9, the ESI Act, Section 2, the ESI Act, Section 2(9, the ESI Act, Section 2(9, Section 2, the Apprentices Act, Section 2, Section 2, Section 2(9, Section 2(9, Section 2(9, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, Section 2, Section 2(9, Section 2(22, Section 2, Section 2, the ESI Act, Section 75, the ESI Act, Section 2, Section 2, the ESI Act, the ESI Act, the ESI Act

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, No.12812, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Appellant(s, Venus Alloy Pvt, Respondent(s, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, ESI, the Appellant-, State Insurance Corporation, Corporation, Directors, the Employees State Insurance Court at Indore, the ESI Court', The ESI Court, Court, Employees' State Insurance Corporation Vs, Apex Engineering Pvt. Ltd., F.L.R.8781, The ESI Court, Directors, The ESI Court, Supreme Court, the High Court of Madhya Pradesh, the Bombay High Court, Sakal Papers Private Limited Vs, State Insurance Corporation, the Bombay High Court, Employees' State Insurance 3 Corporation Vs, Apex Engineering Pvt. Ltd., the Bombay High Court, the appellant- Corporation, Apex Engineering Pvt, Employees’ State Insurance Corporation, Apex Engineering, the ESI Act.7, dismissed.8, the Central Government, the Central Government, Court, Apex Engineering, the Board of Directors, Company, the High Court, the ESI Court, Corporation, Court, inter alia, Court, the High Court, Court, the Karnataka High Court, ESI Corpn, Margarine & Refined Oils, Lab IC844, the High Court, the High Court, the High Court, Court, the High Court, Court, Apex Engineering, Company, Court, Directors, Directors, ESI Court, Court, Apex Engineering, The High Court, Court, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, Apex Engineering, Court, the High Court, Company, the High Court

CARDINAL: 2015, 9, 1, 06.04.2005, 06.04.2005, 5, 5, 24.12.2005, 2, 2, 850, 9, 10, 6, 1, 4, one, 9, 2(9, 5, time].2, 6 9, 22, 9, 6, 7, 11, 8, 8, 13, 2, 9, one, 19, 9, 9, 19, 20, 12, 06.04.2005, 06.04.2005, 10, 22, 9, 1, 12

PRODUCT: VS, SCC86, Directors

PERSON: J Leave, Directors, Directors, Saraswath Films, Shri Dhanwate, Shri Dhanwate, J.(DINESH MAHESHWARI

DATE: 17.02.2014, 2006, 1948, 2005, 1997, 1998, 1998, 22, 1,000/- per month, 1961, 52 of 1961, 2010, two months, annual, 1984, 1983, the preceding twelve months, February, 2019

GPE: MHLR1990Vol, Counsel, New Delhi

WORK_OF_ART: Saraswath Films Vs

NORP: Indian

TIME: under this Act, 3,000/- p.m.