Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

M/S Diffusion Engineers Ltd Vs. The Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Decided On : Apr-17-2015

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 37, the Income Tax Act, Section 35AB of the Act, Section 35AB, Section 37, Section 35 AB, Section 37(1, the Income Tax Act, Section 35A, Section 35AB, Section 37, Section 14 35AB, Section 35A, section 35AB, Section 35A, Section 35A, Section 35AB of the Act, section 35AB of the Act, section 35AB of the Act, section 37, Section 37 of the Act, Section 35AB of the Act, Section 35AB of the Act, Section 35AB of the Act, Section 35AB, Section 37, Section 35AB, Section 37, Section 35AB, Section 35AB of the Act, Section 35AB, Section 35 AB

CARDINAL: 1, 560, 030, 560, 001, 30.6.2008, 3, three, 4, 1, 2.2, more than two, 6, 5, 3.2, 2, 7, 4.3, 6, 6.7, 9.4, 9, 2, 1., 10, 12.6.1985, 15.2, 11 6, 1, 309, 2, 307, 3, 124, 4, 81, 5, 348, 8, thus:12, 35AB(i, one-sixth, five, 9, three, 1, 2, 3, one-sixth, 13, 37, 1, 30, 12, 30 to 36, six, 14, 15, five, 2B, three, 6.1985, 15.2, 16, 16, 32, 17, 5.0, 18, 18, 23, 21, 11.2, 22, three, 24 26, 12.6.1985, 30 to 36, 25, two, 26, 37

ORG: BENGALURU, QUEENS, BENGALURU, ITA, ANNEXURE-A. BANGALORE, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, AO, the CIT (Appeals, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, ITA No.214 & 215/2002, Court, the 4 Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, DEPL, Technical, DEPL, DEPL, Technical know-, DEPL, DEPL, DEPL, the Reserve Bank of India, DEPL, DEPL, DEPL, Associated Company of WCL, DEPL, DEPL, WCL Company, WCL, the CBDT Circular, CIT, CIT, RINGS LTD, CIT vs, EMPIRE JUTE CO. LTD, CIT vs SAYAJI INDUSTRIES LTD, CIT vs MOLEX, Tribunal, the Judgment of the Madras High Court, Income Tax vs, the Judgment of the Apex Court, Income-Tax, MOLEX, Lumpsum, Finance Act, Statute Book, The Budget Speech of Finance, CBDT Circular, CIT Vs, the Apex Court, Shriram Pistons and Rings Ltd, the Delhi High Court, Sayaji Industries Ltd., Madras High Court, CIT, Tamil Nadu Chemical Products Ltd., the Apex Court, Swaraj 19 Engines Ltd., Apex Court, the American Company, Swaraj Engines Ltd., the assessee-Company, the Apex Court, Swaraj Engine Ltd, i.e,1, the Apex Court, Swaraj Engines Ltd, Budget, Finance, the CBDT Circular, the Powers of Section 37, Income Tax (Appeals, Tribunal, the Apex Court, the Apex Court, Swaraj Engines, Tribunal

PERSON: SRI A.SHANKAR, SRI JEEVAN J.NEERALGI, Sri A Shankar, Sri Jeevan J.Neeralgi, Product, Product, instalments.10, Bill 1995, Swaraj Engines, Riken, Riken, Bill, Sd/- Sd/-, Brn/JT

DATE: 1961, IN21993-1994, years 1992-93, the assessment years 1992-93, 1993-94, 1961, years 1992-93, 1993-94, five days 3, the period of, 10 years, the period of 7 years, 30 days, 14 days, the assessment year 1999-2000, 2004, 2012, any previous year, the 1st day of April, 1998, previous year, previous year, previous years, years, 1985, 1.4.1986, March 1999.11, 1985-86, 1.4.1986, three years, annual, three years, six years, the year, years, the assessment year 1999-2000, five years, five years, para-23, 30 days

NORP: English, Indian, American, consideration,2, and3

GPE: United Kingdom, U.K., India, UK, Technical Know-, India, India, Drilcos, India, Riken, Riken, Riken, Drilcos, India, India, Sections, Drilcos, India

WORK_OF_ART: Colmonoy Sweat-on-Paste, Colmonoy Sweat-on-Paste, Product

QUANTITY: 50,000 pounds

PERCENT: 100%, 8%

ORDINAL: first, third, first, Firstly, secondly

PRODUCT: Agreement, Chromium Monoborides 6.5, Agreement, Agreement, Agreement

MONEY: 266 ITR12

LANGUAGE: English

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //