Sri K Nagesh Vs. The Assistant Commissioner

Decided On : Apr-20-2015

Court : Karnataka

LAW: the Income Tax Act, the Income Tax Act, the Immunity Scheme, S.148 of the Act, S.148 of the Act, S.148 of the Act, Section 240, Section 4, Section 143, section 139(5, Section 139(5, Section 148, Section 240, Section 240, the Indian Companies Act, section 7, section 7, Section 70(2, Section 69(2, the Income Tax Act, Section 132, Section 132, Chapter, Chapter XIV-B18would, Chapter XIV-B, Section 240, Section 139 of the Act, Section 139, Article 265 of Constitution of India, Section 240, Article 265 of the Constitution.18, Section 237, Section 237, article 265 of the Constitution”.21, Article 265 of the Constitution.22, article 265 of the Constitution of India, Section 240, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 156 of the Act, Section 140-A of the Act, Section 4, Article 265 of the Constitution of India.27, Section 240, Section 140A, Section 140-A of the Act, Section 140A

CARDINAL: 1, 560, 1, 2, 29.05.2009, 04.2015, 31.8.1992, 30.12.1993, Rs.75,000/-, 3, 31.8.1992, 31.8.1992, 30.12.1993, 3.12.2001, 30.12.1993, 22.2.2002, 5, 2.9.2002, 3.12.2001, 4.2.2003, 7.7.2003, 6, 3.12.2001, 7, of.5, 11.10.2004, 11.10.2004, 9.12.2004, Rs.12,535/-, 14.11.2008, 8, 9 6, 30.12.1993, 261, 367].2, 165, 10 4, 302].8, 30.12.1993, 30.12.1993, 12, 11, 13, 14, 186, 60, 14, 3, 3, 16, 15, 17, 17, 19, 31.8.1992, 20, 19, 21, 22, 23, 23, 25, 24, 26 25, 27, 28, 29, more than one

ORG: KARNATAKA, VINEET SARAN &, Appellant Sri K Nagesh C/o T, 5th Floor Unity Building Annexe Bangalore, ITA, Order, ITA No.1472, Court, the ITA No.1472/BNG/2008, Department, the Income Tax 4 Department, Rs.3,82,810/-, CIT, Rs.96,385/-, Rs.96,385/-, Tribunal, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, Proviso, Income-Tax Vs, Income-Tax And Others, Income-Tax (, Saraya Sugar Mills Ltd., Union of India, Tribunal, Tribunal, Shelly Products India, Act.10, the CIT (Appeals, Income Tax, Assessing, the First Appellate Authority, Tribunal, Proviso, New-Delhi Municipal Committee Vs, the Privy Council, K M MATHEW, The High Court, the High Court, STATE OF KERALA & ORS, V.R.KALLIYANIKUTTY & ANR, the Kerala Revenue Recovery Act, Ajith Jain, Chennai, Tribunal, Tribunal, Tribunal, the Allahabad High Court, Shelly Products, the Apex Court, Bombay High Court, Vinay Chandulal Satia Vs, CIT, The Supreme Court, Ramlal, Rewa Coalfields Ltd., State, Laxmibal, State, State, Section, Shelly Products, Assessing, the Apex Court, Authorities, Department, Tribunal, Tribunal, brn/JT

DATE: this the 20th day of April, 2015, 1961, 29.05.2009, Assessment Year 1992-93, 10.02.1995, 1961, 10.2.1995, Rs.20,704/-, 10.2.1995, 10.2.1995, 20.6.2002, Rs.91,505/-, 19.3.2002, 21.10.2003, 17.10.2003, 21.10.2003, 29.5.2009, 2003, 2004, 2005, 1997, 475].5, 2000, 11 30.12.1993, 1913, the day, January 11, 1996, January 31, 1997, the assessment year 1988-89, June 30, 1988, 1961, 1981, August 20, 1981

MONEY: 002

PERSON: Sri A Shankar, Adv, Sri M.Lava, Sri K V Aravind, Adv, Bangalore, Rs.2,50,000/-, Sri A. Shankar, Sri K V Aravind, Sri A. Shankar, Nirmala L.Mehta Vs, A.Balasubramaniam, Ajit Jain Vs., Sri K V Aravind, Assessing Officer, Kalu Ram, Hans Raj Gupta, MOMMUTTY, HAMSA HAJI, correct.5, Nirmala, N. O. parekh, Howrah Municipallity, Sd/-, Sd/-

GPE: S.Sujatha, Rs.2,53,761/-, 22.2.2002, 22.2.2002, Assessee, assessee, West Bengal v. Administrator

NORP: Gujarat, AIR1999SC1305

WORK_OF_ART: Official Liquidators, Babhutmal Raichand Oswal, Shelly Products Case, Shelly Products

PRODUCT: VS, VS

ORDINAL: first

FAC: Saraya Sugar Mills