Skip to content

Semantic Analysis by spaCy

m.somashekar Vs. State of Karnataka

Decided On : Dec-15-2016

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 28(1, the KIAD Act, Section 3(1, the KIAD Act, Section 2(b)(iv, Section 24(2, the Land Acquisition Act, KIAD Act, Section 6, the Central Act, the KIAD Act, Section 30, the Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, Land Acquisition Act, Section 30, Section 23(1A, Land Acquisition Act, Section 23(2, Section 28, Act 68 of 1994, Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, KIAD Act 11, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Land Acquisition Act, the KIAD Act, Section 11A of the Central Act, The KIAD Act, the Central Act, Section 11A, the MRTP Act, Land Acquisition Act, the Central Act, Section 11A, Central Act 1 of, Section 30, the Land Acquisition Act, Central Act 1 of, Chapter, Section 30, Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 11A, Land Acquisition Amendment Act, Act 68 of 1984, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 28, the Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, the City Improvement Act, Article 14, Article 14, another Acquisition Act, Article 14.31, Article 14, Article 14, a Constitution Bench, Section 23, Land Acquisition Act, the Bangalore Act, Section 23(1, the Acquisition Act, Section 27, the Bangalore Act, Section 27, the Bangalore Act, the Acquisition Act, the Acquisition Act, the Bangalore Act, the Acquisition Act, Section 4(1, Section 23(1, the Acquisiton Act, the Acquisition Act, Act 30 of 2013, Section 24, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, section 11, Land Acquisition Act, section 11, Land Acquisition Act, the Land Acquisition Act, section 11, section 4, Land Acquisition Act, Section 24(1, Section 11, the Old Act, the Old Act, Section 24, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 24(2, the New Act, Section 24(2, Section 11A, the Amending Act, Act 68/1984.23, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 11, Article 14 of the Constitution of India, Section 24, Land Acquisition Act, the Old Act, Article 300A of the Constitution R/w Article 14 of the Constitution, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 24, the Land Acquisition Act, Section 29, the Rule of Legislation, the Land Acquisition Act, the Central Act, Section 10, the New Act, Article 14 of the Constitution, the Land Acquisition Act, the KIAD Act, the KIAD Act, Article 14, Section 24(2, the KIAD Act, Section 24(2, the New Act, Section 24, Article 14 of the Constitution, Section 24, Section 24(2, the RTI Act, Section 24(2

CARDINAL: 1, 087, 087, 087, 087, 2.3, 4.5, 2, 087, 001, 2.3, 001.4, 001, R4, 377/6, 4, No.4, 5, one, No.4, 7, No.4, 8, No.4, No.4, 9, 3, 3, 3, 11, 1, 10, 1, 2.3, 1 SCC500, 4, 7, 4, 13, 3, 3, 4, 30, 15, 3, 1, Seven, one, one, 17, 27, 31, one, 18, three, one, two, one, 19, one, one, one, one, 20, 21, 267, 837, four, one, 4, 22, 22, 22, more than one, 19, 24, 24, 1, 1, 25, 2, 1, 1, 1, No.4, 2, 27, one, 28, 29, 30, 30, four, 25, two, 2011)3, 32 26, 4 to 9, 16, one, 34, 2016(2, 35, 371, 375, 2013.33

ORG: THIS THE15H DAY OF, VARTHUR, VARTHUR HOBLI & POST, SMT.S.N.KANTHAMMA @ S.N.SHANTHAMMA, MADURANAGAR, VARTHUR POST, APPANNA, S/O ERAPPA, ANEKAL, MUTHASANDRA POST, MADURANAGAR, VARTHUR POST, ADV, KARNATAKA,, DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIES AND COMMERCE, KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD, CCAUVERY, ADV, Sri ASHOK N.NAYAK, ADV, VARTHUR HOBLI, BANGALORE EAST, ETC, the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Act, the Karnataka Industrial Area Development Board, the Bengaluru Development Authority, KIADB, KIADB, the State Government, Bengaluru Water Supply, Sewage Board, KIADB, KIADB, Rehabilitation, BWSSB, BWSSB, KIADB, Additional Government, Rehabilitation, KIAD Act, the Apex Court, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY & OTHERS, SHRI RAMTANU CO-OOPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD, BRIJESH KUMAR & OTHERS Vs, GAURI SHANKAR GAUR, U.P., KIAD Act, the Apex Court, WESTERN COALFIELDS LIMITED Vs, Reliance, CITY IMPROVEMENT TRUST BOARD Vs, SCC9 NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST Vs, the Apex Court, KIAD Act, State, Board, Industrial Development Board, the Apex Court, Maharashtra Regional and, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, Land Acquisition Act, Enquiry and Award, the Civil Court, The Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, Court, the Apex Court, BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, NAGPUR IMPROVEMENT TRUST Vs, the Apex Court, Municipal Corporation, The Apex Court, Government, State, The Apex Court, the Apex Court, The Apex Court, Paras No.28, Legislature, Legislature, an Improvement Trust or, State, State, State, State, State, the Apex Court, WESTERN COALFIELDS, SUPREME COURT, State, the Privy Council, Court, the Collector of Customs, the Privy Council, State, M.P. V. M.V. Narasimhan, Court, THE LAND ACQUISITON OFFICER, CITY18 IMPROVEMENT TRUST, the Apex Court, Para Nos.21, The Apex Court, the High Court, Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act 1966, the New Land Acquisition Act, the New Land Acquisition Act, Award, Government, the New Land Acquisition Act, the Apex Court, the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act.22, The New Land Acquisition Act, State, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, State, Parliament, the Old Land Acquisition Act, the New Land Acquisition Act, the New Land Acquisition Act, the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, New Land Acquisition Act, Government, the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, the New Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, Court, State of Madhya Pradesh Vs M.V.Narasimhan, the Supreme Court, the Apex Court, KIAD & MRTP Acts, KIAD & MRTP Act, Rehabilitation, SC, Sections 107 & 108, the State Legislatures, the New Land Acquisition Act, Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act.30, Court, Court, SMT, the Bangalore Development Authority Act, the Karnataka Urban Development Authority Act.31, the New Land Acquisition Act, Annexures-G & G1, the Special Land Acquisition Officer-II, KIADB, Annexures-A1 & A2, the New Land Acquisition Act

DATE: DECEMBER, THIS DAY, 1966, 2015, 2013, 6 period of, 5 years, 7 years, 2013, 2 years, 2011, 2011, 2.3. 9, 2014, 1894, 1894, 2013, 1894, 1994, 1984, 1982, 1973, 1976, 2002, 2003, 12 11, 1994, 1984, 2011, 1894, 1984, 1966, 1966, 1894, 1966, 14 14, 2010, 1894, 1966, 1894, 1894, 2011, 16 16, 1975, 1982, 1976, 1894, 23 22, 1894, 1984, 1894, 1894, five years, 10.12.2008, 16.11.2009, 1894, five years, five years, five years, several years, 1894, five years, 1966, five years, 31, 2013, 2013, 33 28, 2013, five years, five years

GPE: LA, EAST WING, EAST WING, Sri R.B.SATHYANARAYANA, 375/2, 377/3, Bengaluru, Bengaluru City, New Delhi, Old Delhi, India, Nagabhushan, LA, Bengaluru

PERSON: S.V.GOPALA REDDY, Sri JAYAKUMAR S.PATIL, KHANIJA BHAVAN, KHANIJA BHAVAN, Sri, 371/1, Varthur Hobli, Gazette, Plan, BWSSB, G1, Sri Jayakumar, Sri D.L.N.Rao, Sri D.L.N.Rao, Sri Jayakumar, Clarke v. Bradlaugh, Madras V. Nathella Sampathu Chetty, V. H. NARAYANAIAH, Award, Award, Award, Award, Sd/-

MONEY: 001 REP, one Acquisition Act

FAC: Amani Belandur Khane Village

NORP: Bengaluru

PRODUCT: No.1, Act.4, VS, VS, Para, Sub Section 2 of Section 24

TIME: 10 KIAD Act, the second Act, the previous Act, the previous Act

PERCENT: 30%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 100%

ORDINAL: second, first, third, second, first

WORK_OF_ART: Codes, Section 11A, Scheme (Sections

EVENT: LA Act, the New LA Act

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //