Naresh Balasubramaniam Vs. State of Karnataka

Decided On : Feb-15-2017

Court : Karnataka

LAW: Section 482, Section 66, the Information Technology Act, the IT Act, the Indian Penal Code, Section 66, the IT Act, Section 34, Section 2(c, the PCMCS Act, Information Technology Act, the Indian Penal Code, Paragraph 22, Section 2, the PCMCS Act, Section 2(e, the Consumer Protection Act, the Consumer Protection Act, Section 482, the Consumer Protection Act

CARDINAL: 1, about 41, 2, 560 001, No.2, 560 100, 22.6.2016, one, two, 4, two, 5, over 10,000, 6, one, 72, 420, 419, 405, 417, 416, 417, 419, 420, 8, 9, one, 10, two, 11 two, 12, one, 24, 14, 15, 22, 16, 3 to 6, 8, 17 4, 18, 19, several hundred, 20, 5, 21, 419, 420, 2, 5, 23

ORG: THIS THE15H DAY, Cyber Crime Police Station, CID, Nisarga Residency, Neeladri Nagar, This Criminal Petition, Criminal Procedure, the I Additional Bangalore Chief, Metropolitan Magistrate, Court, the Cyber Crime Police, Crime No.66/2016, FIR, the Court of the Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Q-Net Limited, M/s, Vihaan Direct Selling, Karthik, Vihaan Direct Selling, the Q-Net, Gold Quest International Pvt. Ltd. & Quest Net Enterprises Ltd., the Indian Government, the Q-Net, the Indian Government, Sections 406, IPC, Accused no.4, IPC, Sections 4 & 5, The Q-Net, M/s Amway, M/s Oriflame, M/s, Unilever, Vihan Direct Selling, Independent Representatives, IRs, IRs, IRs, Q-Net, the Statement of Objections, Independent Representative ( IR, IRs, IR, M/s, Vihaan Direct Selling, the Bombay High Court, the Bombay High Court, I.Rs, IRs, IRs, IR, IRs, Directors, Supreme, State, Charge, M/s Q-Net India, M/s Q- Net, M/s, Vihaan Direct Selling, Charge, the Federation of Indian Chambers, the Government of India, Advisory, the State Governments and Union Territories, QNet, QNet, Money Circulation Scheme or Prize Chit, Sections 4, FICCI, FIR, IPC, the Central Government, the Model 22 Framework Guidelines on Direct Selling, Supreme, CBI, Supreme, FIR, KS

PERSON: Balasubramaniam, Nadesha Pillai, Pantail Hillparl Phase 5, Shri Shyam, M.S. Advocate, Pragya, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Bangalore, Shri Harsha Ramesh, Q-1, Q-1, Bangalore, Suresh Timri, Srinivas Vanka, Pleader, Pleader, Suresh Timri, Pleader, Desai, Pleader, Model Framework for Guidelines on Direct, Sagar Suri, Hiralal Bhagwati, Bangalore

DATE: 59200, 2 2, about 22 years, 1973, 18.10.2016, 18.10.2016, 18.1.2017, this day, 2000, 1860, 18.10.2016, 23238/2016, 1978, 1978, 2008, 1978, 1978, 1986, 1986, 2000, 2003, 1986

GPE: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, Karnataka, Bengaluru, Electronic City, Bengaluru, India, Dubai, Dubai, Hongkong, India, Mumbai, Malaysia, Malaysia, India, Malaysia, India, Malaysia, India, India, Dubai, Kurianchan, Chacko, Kerala, India, Malaysia, Bombay, India, India, Vihan, India

ORDINAL: second, Secondly, Thirdly

PRODUCT: Rs.55,000/-, Vijay Eswaran, SCC636

FAC: Charge

WORK_OF_ART: a Managing Consultant, Prize Chits of Money Circulation Scheme 13 (Banning) Act, Prize Chits and Money Circulation Schemes (Banning