Amrit Paul Singh Vs. Tata Aig General Insurance Co. Ltd.

Decided On : May-17-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 66, Section 66, Act 54 of 1994, Section 2(2, Section 66, section 43, Section 149 of the Act, Section 149 of the Act, Section 149(2)(a)(ii, Section 149 of the Act, Section 149 of the Act, Section 96, the Motor 5, Section 149 of the Act, Section 96, the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 149, Section 149 of the Motor Vehicles Act, Section 149, Section 149 of the Act, Section 149, Section 149, Section 149(2, the Assam Act, Section 146 of the 1988 Act, Chapter XI, Section 146 20 of the Act, Section 146 of the Act, Section 66, Section 66

CARDINAL: 1, No.2, No.2, 26.02.2013, 20.11.2014, No.2, 19.02.2013, 1, 8, 3, 3, 6, 2(31, 28, less than four, 31, 6, 1, 2, 14.11.1994, 7, 3, 1, 3, 3, 1, one, No.2, 10, 11, 4, 5, 39, 2, 2, 3, 13, 2, 2, 2, 69, 6, 5 SCC2113, 4, 5, 83, 5, zero, 14, 1, 2, one, two, 15, 92, 7, 3, 16, 110, 17, 17, five, 3, 5, 3, 14, 16, 20, No.2, No.2, 21, 22

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL, S.L.P., No.7692 of 2017, AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. & Ors, Respondent(s, JUDGMENT Dipak Misra, CJI, the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, to.2, Court, National Insurance Co. Ltd., others1, FAO No.1702 of, the High Court of Punjab, Oriental Insurance Company Ltd., other2, National Insurance Company Limited, The High Court, the High Court, the High Court, State, Regional Transport Authority, State Transport Authority, the Central Government, State Government, the State Government, the Central Government, the Central Government, State, State, State, State, the High Court, the High Court, Bench, National Insurance Co. Ltd, Court, Court, Court, Court, Court, Tribunal, Tribunal, Court, Tribunal, Emphasis, Court, Court, Court, United India Insurance Co. Limited, Bench, Reliance General, Court, the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, NCDRC, Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd., others9, Bench, HDFC Bank Limited v. Reshma, Court, The High Court, Court, SCC67911, the State of Assam, Court, The High Court, Respondent 1 State of Assam, The High Court, The High Court, The High Court, the State Government, State, the State of Assam.21, HDFC Bank Limited, Court, the High Court, the High Court, CJI, Dipak Misra

PERSON: Paul Singh & Anr, Appellant(s, Jagir Singh, Jagir Singh, Challa Bharathamma, Haryana, Khemaka v., Kamlesh Kaur, others3, Moti Ram v. ICICI Lombard, Challa Bharathamma, Sudhir Walia, Kumar Singh, Swaran Singh, Sohan Lal, Sohan Lal Passi, P. Sesh Reddy, Bench, Lehru, Challa Bharathamma, Meena Variyal, Purnya Kala Devi v. State of Assam, Swaran Singh, Lakhmi Chand, Swaran Singh, Khanwilkar

ORDINAL: second, first, first, third, first, third, first, third, third

WORK_OF_ART: MACT Case No.70, Bench, Bench

DATE: 2013, 1988, 19.02.2013, September 2012, 20.12.2012, 3 19.02.2013, 27.02.2013, 2 2014, 1018 3 2006, 4 2015, 19.02.2013, 27.02.2013, 9 10, 27.02.2013, 19.02.2013, 2004, 1939, 70, 1996, 1988, 2003, 8 (2016, 9 (2007, 2015, 2014, May 17, 2018

PERCENT: 9%

QUANTITY: 8 x x x x x, 3,000 kilograms

FAC: the Official Gazette, the Official Gazette

PRODUCT: Bench, Bench, Tripitaka

GPE: Lakhmi Chand, New Delhi

EVENT: the 1988 Act