Shailesh Manubhai Parmar Vs. Election Commission of India Through the Chief Election Commissioner

Decided On : Aug-21-2018

Court : Supreme Court of India

LAW: Article 32 of the Constitution of India, Rule 30, Article 80(4, Section 59 of the Representation of the People Act, Section 169, Rule 70, Section 79A of the Act, Article 80(4, Constitution, Article 80, Rule 80, Section 128, Section 79, Section 128, Article 19 of the Constitution, the Constitution Bench ruled:- ―204, Article 80(1)(b, Article 80(2, Article 80(4, Act 40 of, Rule 22, Rule 30, the Returning Officers for Conduct of Elections, Constitution, the Constitution Bench, Article 191(2, Constitution, Constitution, article 99 or, Constitution, Constitution, Constitution, Article 80, Constitution, Constitution, Article 324 of the Constitution, Constitution, Article, the Constitution Bench, Article 324, Article 327

ORG: THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA, Manubhai Parmar, CJI, the Indian National Congress party, Gujarat Legislative Assembly, Gujarat Legislature Secretariat, the Council of States, NOTA, the Election Commission of India, the Union Territories, Andaman & Nicobar Islands, Chandigarh, Dadra & Nagar, Haveli, Daman & Diu and, NOTA, the Rajya Sabha, the Election Commission, the applicability of NOTA, Rajya Sabha, the Election Commission of India, NOTA, the Rajya Sabha, Court, People’s Union for Civil Liberties, PUCL, the Election Commission, Rajya Sabha, the Central Government, the Election Commission, Assembly, NOTA, the Election Commission, inter alia, NOTA, the Election Commission, Rajya Sabha, Rajya Sahba, NOTA, Court, NOTA, Rajya Sabha, the Election Commission, NOTA, Rajya Sabha, so.5, the Council of States, State, the Council of States, the Legislative Assembly of the State, the Council of States, Court, Court, Court, Court, the Election Commission, Court, the Election Commission, NOTA, Court, Court, Emphasis, Court, the Election Commission, Kuldip Nayar, Union of India, State, the Council of States, the Council of States, State, State, State, State, the electoral college, the Legislative Assembly of the State, the Council of States, State, Court, the Council of States, Court, the Rajya Sabha and, Legislative Council, Court, Sections 59, the Council of States, Court, Parliament, the Council of States, Court, Bench, the Election Commission, NOTA, Rajya Sabha, Commission, ―The Commission, NOTA, Rajya Sabha, Commission, Sub-Rule, Commission, the Council of States Rule, Rajya Sabha, Rajya, Commission, NOTA, Commission, the CE Rules 1961, NOTA, Commission, NOTA, Rajya Sabha, State Legislative Councils:- 19, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, Commission, NOTA, RO, Rajya Sabha, State of Uttar Pradesh, the Election Commission, NOTA, the Council of States, the Election Commission, PUCL, Court, Parliament, State Legislative Assemblies, NOTA, the Council of States, the Council of States, the Legislative Assemblies, Parliament, the Council of States, the State Legislature, the Tenth Schedule, Court, House, the Tenth Schedule, House, House, House, House, House, House, the Goa Legislative Assembly, Court, NOTA, The Statement of Objects, Address, Parliament, Parliament, the Statement of Objects, Manoj Narula v. Union of India 10, NOTA, the Council of States, State, NOTA, the Council of States, NOTA, the Election Commission, PUCL, NOTA, NOTA, the Council of States, NOTA, an Election Commission, Parliament, State, the Election Commission, Election Commissioners, Parliament, the Election Commission, the House of the People, the Legislative Assembly, State, the Legislative Council of each State, Council, Election Commission, the Election Commission, the Supreme Court, Commission, Parliament, the Election Commissioners, State, the Election Commission, the Election Commission, the Election Commission, Kuldip Nayar, the Election Commission, Parliament, Court, the Election Commission, Parliament, State Legislature, Commission, the Election Commission, Parliament, Court, Commission, Commission, the Election Commission, NOTA, the Council of States, NOTA, NOTA, NOTA, the Council of States, the Election Commission, NOTA, the Council of States, Dipak Misra

PERSON: JUDGMENT, Singh Deo, Ranga Nath Mishra, Bench, SCC4996, Lok Sabha, Articles, Bench, Ram Jawaya Kapur v. State, Chandra Mohan, others6, Kuldip Nayar, Jones7.In constituency, Bench, Supp, Supp, SCC65124, Paragraphs 2(1)(a, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Reasons, Bill, Bill, Reasons, Mohinder Singh Gill, Krishna Iyer, J.(A.M. Khanwilkar, J.(Dr, D.Y. Chandrachud

DATE: 1st August, 2017, 1961, 12th November, 2015, the 1st, 1951, the 1st, 2013, PUCL‘s, PUCL‘s, 24th January, 2014, 12th November, 2015, the 1st, 6, 2002, 76, 1 44, 80, 11 8, PUCL‘s, 1951, 1951, 1993, 1951, 2006, 94, 2003, the month of April 2014, 3, 1st, 3, PUCL‘s, 1955, 1982, 1972, 8 1994, 1992, 5, fifteen days, the expiry of six months, 188.‖ 21, 1986, 1985, PUCL‘s, 1978, 1 31, 33 28, 2018

CARDINAL: 2 2, 70, 1, 40A, 1, 10, two, 5 4, 2, three, more than one, 1, one, one, 1, 2, 3, 43, more than one, 100, one, 7, 81, 2, more than one, 3, two, 4)(a, 8, 5, 4, 6, 9 80, 2, one hundred, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, two, 8), two, 2, 3, only two, 79, more than one, 12, 49, 49, 49, One 3, 4, 10, 49, 14, 11, 4, 80(1)(2, 16, 128, 17, 15, 24.01.2014, 1, 18, 1, 70, 1961.2, 16, 12.11.2015, 73(2, 1, 2, 73(2, 20, 17, 2, 4, 6, only one, 18, 5, 2, 1, 22, 19, 7, 128, 8, two, 9, 2, 2, 4, 25, 26, NOTA.23, 10, 9, 28, 29, one, one, one, 1, 2, 3, 4, 30, 1, 5, 6, 1, 26, four, 32

GPE: Lakshadweep, Ananga, Ananga, Lily Thomas v., secrecy.12, others4, India, NEW DELHI

ORDINAL: first, first, first, first, second, first, first, first, 2nd, 3rd, 1st, 2nd, 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 2nd, 3rd, first, 2nd, 3rd, 1st, first, first, first, first, first, first

NORP: Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, Rules, ballot‖, Indian, Roman, Indian, Australian, R.

PRODUCT: CLR22123

FAC: Ravi S. Naik v. Union of India, Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu